• Daftydux@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Yes. You look at the title of the movie and you go, nope.

      You just know there’s some producer out there who is salivating over minion merch.

  • Denjin@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Waterworld. At the time the most expensive movie ever made and the most spectacular flop of all time.

      • Babalugats@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        51 minutes ago

        I must be on my own. I know John Carter flopped phenomenally, but I really liked it. Thought it was a great movie. Was very annoyed when I found out that there may never be a 2nd. Even if there was, at this stage it is very unlikely to be the same cast. IIRC, a lot of the blame was on Disney marketing. But IDK about these things.

        • Daftydux@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          42 minutes ago

          Don’t worry brother, I still go back and watch waterworld. I like oceanscapes and post apocalyptic settings. Esthetic can be enough for me.

      • MagicShel@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Neither of those movies were really all that terrible. I enjoyed John Carter. But clearly they didn’t connect with audiences.

          • jacksilver@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            Yeah, I was upset they didnt continue John Carter, it was just a fun zany scifi movie. I think it was the advertising that killed it, but if they had stuck with it I think it could have done well.

        • beejboytyson@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          It’s the name and the power concept, all around bland and forgettable. Feel like that movie was a passion project of a book fan.

      • Denjin@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        I did some digging and apparently Waterworld somehow broke even. I remember a lot of the hype around the film at the time was wanting to see if it was really as bad as people said it was.

  • Odo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Battleship. It’s just such a bizarre license for a movie, and certainly one nobody ever asked for. (Well, outside Hasbro execs clearly desperate for another Transformers-level hit.)

    Oddly watchable in a big dumb fun kind of way, at least. And hey, it has Jesse Plemons not playing a total sociopath, so that’s neat.

  • Almacca@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    11 hours ago

    ‘Live action’ remakes of animated classics, or any remake of an already good film.

    Remake the ones that had potential. but failed in the execution.

    • ssillyssadass@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Live action remakes are the end point of capitalism in media. Take something that people liked made money, and do it again with the same formula but a fresh coat of paint. No need to hire writers or spend time making a good story, just use the last one. No risks were ever taken.

    • Maestro@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 hours ago

      All those Disney live action remakes are sooo bad. People just don’t have the expressiveness of cartoon characters. The Lion King was the worst. The characters were animated and still wooden

      • Wugmeister@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        The Cinderella one slapped. But that was the first one, and it was successful because it was made with care and thoughtful intention. Disney has been chasing that sucess ever since

      • ChexMax@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 hours ago

        I think Christopher Robin and maleficent were good. As long as they’re telling a new story it’s fun to see the old characters. When it’s just the exact same plot but a little darker and live action over animation it’s so dumb. Our CGI just ain’t good enough to justify that.

        They’re remaking Moana already, and still a new movie, relative.

        • MagicShel@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Moana is all about the musical performances. I love the whole movie but what is on the screen just kinda punctuates and gives context to the music for me. Frozen is the same way. And they’re thinking they are going to remake all that music and have it be just as good?

          It would be like trying to remake The Blues Brothers with Dwayne Johnson and Jason Statham just because the original is 40 years old.

  • daggermoon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Perhaps, Bucky Larson: Born to Be a Star. I have a weird relationship with this movie. I know it’s shit but I can’t help but be fascinated by it. It’s a fun movie to make your friends and family watch with you so you can watch their reaction. I wouldn’t even say it’s so bad it’s good. It’s bad but entertaining at the same time. I watch it and think “how the fuck did this get made?”

  • Annoyed_🦀 @lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Ohh i forgot another one of my favorite. Ghost in the Shell live action. I love that movie because of Scarlett Johansson, but if you watch the original anime, everything just feels better, and the live action is simply unnecessary.

  • Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    12 hours ago

    There’s a distinction to point out between “absolutely no business getting made” vs “the final product turned out to be shit”. I can’t really think of anything that belongs to the former… I haven’t actually seen most of the films mentioned here so far, except the SW sequels… which turned out to be shit, but that doesn’t mean they shouldn’t have made SW sequels at all: they just shouldn’t have made them shit.

    • ssillyssadass@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Makes me think of the Warcraft movie. Warcraft actually has some good lore to get into, it could totally be made into a good movie. Of course they botched it though.

    • Daftydux@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      12 hours ago

      I was more curious about the former but got a lot more of the latter. Unfortunately, it would be difficult to phrase the question to get the desired result. Oh well.

      • MagicShel@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        51 minutes ago

        I’d you want the former, I’ll say Arcane. They poured money into that and it shows. They will never be able to count money made by that, though it was great word of mouth and I’m sure increased sales. But they spent like a half-billion dollars on that with no hope of any return. But damn that was a hell of a series.

      • 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 🇮 @pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        12 hours ago

        My initial thought seeing the title was Megalopolis but I don’t know the budget for it. Haven’t seen it yet, so I can’t speak to the quality of it, but I had read a ton of shit talking about how hard it was for Copolla to get it made and then distributed after he did make it. It sounds like the only thing that fits the question.

  • ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    58
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    16 hours ago

    The Hobbit trilogy. It’s hard to understand how Peter Jackson could mess up movie after movie after movie like that.

    • justOnePersistentKbinPlease@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      45
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Simple:

      He and his crew had 2 years of prep for Lotr, storyboards, finding locations, making props and sets, etc.

      New Line Cinemas forced him to do that same prep in 6 months for the Hobbit. Allegedly they didn’t even fully finish the script and had to cut in Del Toro scenes.

      • Stovetop@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        54
        ·
        15 hours ago

        The forced trilogy structure also really hurt it. When the Hobbit film adaptation was initially announced (at the time just two movies, even), I thought that it didn’t make any sense to adapt a book shorter than any of the individual LotR installments into multiple movies. When they revealed it would be a trilogy, I knew it was some studio decision to milk it for money and didn’t have high hopes.

        There is actually a fan edit floating around online somewhere called “The Hobbit: Extended Edition” which, contrary to what the name might imply, cuts down the trilogy into a single movie of comparable length to the LotR Extended films. Still not perfect, but a huge improvement in quality just from cutting out all of the extra garbage that didn’t need to be there.

        • Jack_Burton@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          4 hours ago

          There are a few different edits, but my fave is the M4 Book Edit. It only follows what was covered in the book and cuts out all the additions like the Kili/Tauriel love story (and Tauriel is cut out completely along with Azog until the end), the Dol Guldur stuff, and Gandalf’s escapades outside the party. It cuts the trilogy down to 4hr18min. Aside from a few unavoidably janky transitions, it’s great.

          I absolutely adore it for 2 reasons: One, I really dislike the trilogy as a whole, but that’s because of the bloat, which M4 gets rid of. Two, the older I get the harder it is to go through LOTR as often as I like. I usually do an LOTR rewatch once a year, and tried to add in the Hobbit, but usually stopped after the first. It’s just too much time for not enough payoff. With the M4 edit, I’ll get stoned and watch it 5 or 6 times a year.

          For as much flack as Jackson gets the for The Hobbit movies, he did a phenomenal job where it counts. There really is a wonderful, true-to-source Hobbit adventure scattered throughout the 8hr52min bloat that is the trilogy.

          For funsies, if you like the other bits there’s another fan edit called Durin’s Folk and the Hill of Sorcery that’s 1hr8min that covers Gandalf’s adventure after he fucks off from the party at Mirkwood.

      • MidsizedSedan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        13 hours ago

        I think it was Prime’s Theater where I learnt that for the Smaug fight scene for movie 2, they planed the set the night before, painted the next morning, filmed, and the paint was still wet when the sets were taken down.

  • spittingimage@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    83
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    16 hours ago

    The Last Jedi.

    I left the theatre angry that they spent enough money to take mankind back to the moon on something that stupid.

    • spittingimage@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      64
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      16 hours ago

      I can’t leave it at that. I have to add some details.

      Both the empire and the rebels repeatedly made tactical decisions so stupid a five-year old would know better. The opening battle involved sending unprotected bombers against a ship with anti-bomber defences and keeping the enemy commander talking on the phone to delay his response. That works in a Mel Brooks movie, not in Star Wars.

      They killed a fan-favourite character off-screen. What, was the puppet too old to reprise its role?

      The empire’s main guy decided to chase the rebels down instead of destroying them immediately. For fun, I guess.

      Phasma’s a badass. Except that she capitulates at the first sign of personal danger.

      All Holdo had to say was “yes, there’s a plan. Not telling you what because of operational secrecy”. Instead she expected Poe to blindly follow orders when he’d already shown he couldn’t do that.

      “Oh no, the sacred texts!” …that you attempted to burn a moment ago.

      • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        11 hours ago

        I highly highly recommend this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CuuDTnMPMgc

        I think you’ll like it a lot. I realized that bathos is what I hated about the Last Jedi. They killed so many truly deep moments to have stupid jokes. They couldn’t let anything just be serious. It ruined the tone of the movie, couldn’t decide if they wanted to be a comedy or a drama, and so they did neither.

      • jordanlund@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        46
        ·
        15 hours ago

        My favorite bit:

        Leia gives Rey a pendant and tells her that she can use that to track them wherever they go.

        In the SAME SCENE, with NO CUTS, they are tracked by the first order and shout “THAT’S IMPOSSIBLE!”

        You just described, IN THE SAME SCENE, how it is, in fact, possible.

        Bonus: Putting a tracker in the Falcon was how the Death Star found Yavin IV in the very first movie.

      • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        14 hours ago

        All Holdo had to say was “yes, there’s a plan. Not telling you what because of operational secrecy”. Instead she expected Poe to blindly follow orders when he’d already shown he couldn’t do that.

        Well, he did fine following orders in the first movie, and then they changed the entire character in the second movie but kept the same name. I have no idea why they did that.

      • MotoAsh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        16 hours ago

        You expect a movie director only interested in pretty scenes to write a good plot!?

        … your name must be Kathleen Kennedy…

      • SanguinePar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        9 hours ago

        No, the horses were in Rise of Skywalker.

        The Last Jedi was the one with the “Can you hear me now?” gags, and Luke tossing the lightsaber away.

    • MagicShel@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      14 hours ago

      And yet… it’s my favorite post-OT movie. It could’ve used another draft to tighten a couple things up here and there, but it was good.

      Now… TRoS is one of the worst films I’ve ever seen in my life and is the only Star Wars property I’ve only seen a single time and never will watch again. Hell I watched Book of Boba Fett twice. Shit, I’ve watched In the Name of the King: A Dungeon Siege Tale twice. I’d have to go back to Battlefield Earth to think of an equally terrible film.

      But when watching The Last Jedi I feel nothing but joy.

    • Daftydux@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      15 hours ago

      I see why they made it but really the ip must be toxic because there’s no reason they cant make these movies.

        • jordanlund@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          19
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          15 hours ago

          Rogue One is a shitfest for a variety of reasons:

          The original writer director didn’t start with a script, he started with a supercut of other sci fi films and used that to make a script.

          https://slate.com/culture/2017/01/rogue-one-s-editors-used-pieces-of-wargames-and-aliens-to-mock-up-the-film-s-first-draft.html

          Even when he had a script, he spent an hour a day shooting off script for things that looked cool, but served no purpose.

          So when the first trailers came out, they were full of gibberish footage that was never actually used in the movie.

          https://www.polygon.com/2017/1/6/14195898/rogue-one-star-wars-trailer-jyn-erson

          Then he got fired and a new writer director was brought in, one who said his super power was he never liked Star Wars.

          https://theplaylist.net/tony-gilroy-rogue-one-podcast-20180405/

          “Because that was my superpower. A) I don’t like ‘Star Wars’—not that I don’t like it, but I’ve never been interested in ‘Star Wars’ ever, so I had no reverence for it whatsoever, I was unafraid about that and they were in such a swamp… they were in so much, terrible, terrible trouble that all you could do was improve their position.”

          So you get conflicting scenes, one where Cassian has no trouble murdering an innocent informant, but not long after gets all sweaty and conflicted when it’s time to assassinate a legitimate military target.

          https://youtu.be/LORtuZ0ISF4#t=48s

          vs.

          https://youtu.be/eCN7zF1BMIQ

          No character growth, no arc, just in one scene he has no trouble murdering an innocent guy WHO HELPED HIM BTW, but later refuses to take out a military target HE WAS SUPPOSED to kill.

          To say nothing of crapping all over the iconic opening of Star Wars by having Vader watch the Death Star plans fly away, personally, with his own eyes.

          • SpatchyIsOnline@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 hours ago

            No character growth, no arc, just in one scene he has no trouble murdering an innocent guy WHO HELPED HIM BTW, but later refuses to take out a military target HE WAS SUPPOSED to kill.

            Yeah, it’s almost like the target he was about to assassinate could be the only person in the galaxy who knows how to take out the weapon he just witnessed level a city.

            To say nothing of crapping all over the iconic opening of Star Wars by having Vader watch the Death Star plans fly away, personally, with his own eyes.

            Those two scenes line up perfectly and imo are quite satisfying when watching the two films back to back. In what way does Rogue One’s ending “crap all over” A New Hope’s opening?

            • jordanlund@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 hours ago

              In Star Wars, Vader interrogates Leia, he talks about the plans being transmitted, not that he saw them personally be stolen.

              He’s also ragged on by Motti for not having found the tapes when Rogue One puts him in the same hallway with them.

              Speaking of… he force grabs every one and every thing in that hallway except the ONE THING he’s there for. Vader is not that STUPID.

              The Death Star Plans have plot armor, they HAVE to get away, don’t put them in the same hallway as Vader and don’t make them a physical object that can be grabbed.

          • WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            24
            ·
            15 hours ago

            It’s pretty funny that it still turned out to be the best Star Wars film since the OG trilogy.

            • jordanlund@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              15 hours ago

              I dunno, I think the best of the Disney versions is still Force Awakens. The big complaint is “Well, it’s just Star Wars…” which is true… but it’s Star Wars without George Lucas. They had to prove they could do what Lucas did without Lucas and I think they succeeded in that.

              Then Last Jedi shit the bed. Then Carrie Fisher died which painted them into a corner with Rise of Skywalker. Force Awakens was Han, Last Jedi was Luke, Rise of Skywalker was supposed to be Leia… 😢

            • bamboo@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              11
              ·
              12 hours ago

              about 2/3 of what they’re saying is about the production and trailers before the movie was released. Other critiques about no character growth for Andor, but not mentioning Jyn’s arc at all.

              Also Rogue One brought us Andor, so even if it was a terrible movie, it spawned some of the best TV in the last 5 years, which says a lot about the movie and the characters.

              • MagicShel@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                2 hours ago

                Also no character growth for Andor while also complaining that he kills a guy in cold blood but then doesn’t kill Galen later under orders. And then breaks orders again because he put his faith in Jyn and not the Rebels.

                Rogue One is a good movie and I don’t care about production issues. It made the Empire far more menacing than even the OT did. Peak Vader. Peak Death Star. Even peak Stormtroopers.

                • bamboo@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 hour ago

                  Yeah I didn’t want to analyze that too much, but the circumstances were completely different. The first guy he had to kill for his own preservation. The second time he was under no threat and starting to defy orders and listening to Jyn. It’s almost like a nitpick for the sake of picking things apart.

            • jordanlund@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              14 hours ago

              Same. I got as far as “Yer a wizard rebel now!” and was like “Nope!” Took 3 full tries before I finished it.

              The Rebel Moon movies are better than Rogue One and that’s saying something.

              • scytale@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                11 hours ago

                The Rebel Moon movies are better than Rogue One

                Woah slow down there. I can understand not liking Rogue One, but no way the trash that is Rebel Moon better.

      • SupraMario@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        16 hours ago

        You take that back! It spawned andor which is also amazing. Rogue one proves they can actually make a gritty star wars film that shows a broken universe wouldn’t be all good vs evil bullshit.

        • Stovetop@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          15 hours ago

          I didn’t think I could dislike Rogue One until I watched Andor. After finishing Andor and then rewatching Rogue One, I felt disappointed that it wasn’t quite as good.

          Not that it means Rogue One is a bad Star Wars film, but that Andor is just that good. I don’t think they’ll ever make another piece of Star Wars media that can surpass it.

          • UniversalBasicJustice@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            9 hours ago

            Are you familiar with Edward 40-Hands?

            Participants have a 40oz of Steel Reserve (or similar) duct taped to each hand. You may not remove the bottles until both are empty. The tradition is to watch old kung fu movies but this movie is absolutely acceptable. I advise wearing gym shorts; you WILL need to piss before you are done.

    • MimicJar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      7 hours ago

      The moment they announced Cats I knew it wasn’t going to work.

      First, the story sucks. A bunch of cats prancing around and learning not to be a dick to that one cat.

      Second, Cats is a spectacle. The reason you go see Cats in a theater is for the spectacle. Everyone is dressed up and dancing around. It’s meant to be an experience. You can’t translate that to film.

    • Daftydux@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      15 hours ago

      I support the idea of making a cats movie. Just not like that. Should have been more costumes then cgi. Youre audience is furrys… so do furrys…