• HalfSalesman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    9 minutes ago

    I date/have sex with who I’m physically attracted to. Otherwise I’m OK if we just stay (non-sexual) friends. Us having stuff in common doesn’t make me horny for them or want to romance them.

    If we have nothing in common because of an age gap, then the sexual relationship becomes a reason to learn about them. As long as we agree with each other on politics.

    That said I have no expectations, admittedly atm all I’ve been getting is one night stands every once in a while and I’d like deeper relationships (I’m poly). But fuck maybe I just wont get one. shrugs I’ll just keep trying until I get one.

  • neukenindekeuken@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 hours ago

    And now you understand why older men dating young girls is creepy, even if legal.

    They have nothing in common. There’s no way. It’s pure physical attraction above all else.

    • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Or both sides like to learn from each other and grow towards each other over time?

      There are worse reasons why an extreme age gap is seen as creepy, “not knowing each others interests” is not one of them.

    • shalafi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 hour ago

      I’m 54 and most of the people I know are in their early 20s. We get along great and have plenty to talk about.

      • mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        55 minutes ago

        Yeah, I’m in my mid 30’s and my best friend is nearing 50. His oldest child is the same age as my younger brother. Believe it or not, people can have common interests that aren’t entirely reliant on their age.

        Though I will say that age becomes less relevant as you get older… A 29 year old dating a 19 year old is pretty universally creepy, but few people would say the same about a 49 year old dating a 39 year old. Same age gap, but it’s assumed that the 39 year old has enough life experience to actually make their own decisions. Even in my mid-20’s, I was looking at 19 year olds as if they were literal children. There’s a lot of maturing that happens in the late teens and early 20’s.

  • kadaverin0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    I dated a 19 year old at 22 and even in that relatively minor gap there was palpable divide in mindset and priorities. I was looking to start a career and get my life established. She graduated high school a few month prior to turning 19 and just wanted to get high and watch musicals.

    • Hadriscus@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      60 minutes ago

      That’s the mindset of plenty of people at 25 or 30 even. I think personal development/priorities are to blame more so than the age gap

    • DeadMartyr@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 hour ago

      I was barely 23 and am currently dating the same girl I met who was 19. (Its about to be 2 years woo!)

      I had just gotten out of military so most girls in my classes were 3-4 years younger and I wasn’t interested in dating (I like women a bit older than me) but she wreckingballed into my life because she saw something she wanted and actively attempted to get it.

      This is the best relationship I’ve ever had but I won’t deny that sometimes the response I get to something serious and wanting to plan ahead is met by my partner suggesting I move into the city (alone) to be closer just so she knows what it’s like to have a boyfriend in the city.

      Her focuses right now are being young and getting her excitement now before she has to square away. She used to think everyone has a stoner era and that was just what people did, so she was surprised how anti-drug/vice I was. The mental divide is definitely something I would warn people about when dating with age differences.

      I dont understand the guys that date fresh 18 year olds in their near 30’s, I know its legal but I genuinely dont understand what a 30 year old would find so interesting about an 18 year old other than just trying to bang/control them.

  • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    3 hours ago

    The brainrot is real, even with “old hags”. My ex was 3 years younger than me, but she was an avid tiktok scroller. I was often being shown and taught about new “memes” that everyone promptly forgot about by the next week.

  • Hadriscus@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 hour ago

    What does that mean ? mid fr fr ? doesn’t fr mean for real ?

    Mid must mean “underwhelming”

    And big mood ? that’s very obscure

  • Grass@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    people both younger and older than me talk like this and I just want to go anywhere else every time I hear it

  • P1k1e@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 hours ago

    I once made the mistake of dating someone 12 years younger than me (she was 25). Man, what a mistake, nevermind the cultural differences, her emotional maturity was…intolerable, and this from a person I’d considered a friend for a year already. It was the first and last time iv ever done that.

  • sleen@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    8 hours ago

    OP doesn’t understand what cultural progression is. Of course different people gonna do stuff differently as time progresses, the class she was when you where in high school is just irrelevant.

    This is the case where op just has skill issue, and is stuck in the past like a boomer he is.

    • Lucky_777@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      When you call someone born in the late 1990s a boomer though. It might be “hip” or “trendy” to do. But Boomers were born in the 50s man. Young kids calling adults from different generations “Boomers” just makes you sound like you didn’t pay attention in history class.

  • QueenHawlSera@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    12 hours ago

    I’m 34 dating a 25 year old myself. Which I checked, it passes the “Half your age plus 7” test

    (34 / 2 = 17 + 7 = 24) Sometimes I still feel weird about it though

    • Barbecue Cowboy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      5 hours ago

      I’m just a bit older, but been there.

      I could never get past it though. I have a daughter too, and it really just takes one experience where they really remind you of your kid and… yeah, I don’t think I can do this y’all.

    • Zozano@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      “My girlfriend did this test and I think its broken? Her minimum age is higher than her starting age”

    • ethaver@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      11 hours ago

      @ 30 22 feels waaay too damn young. tf am I even gonna talk to this person about? I’m a decade in to a high stress high reliability industry. I’m starting to get Greg grey hairs! I make jokes about all the child rapists I met while working for the state! Too much happened in that 8 years between us. Too damn much.

    • chunes@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Probably about the time that we decided that a certain age means you’re an adult and can, in fact, make decisions for yourself

    • FauxLiving@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      When we decided to mind our own business and stop moralizing other people’s relationships based on our personal feelings.

      • sleen@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Exactly, this “rule” is really just equivalent to other forms of snake oil there is. It is baseless and completely made up.

        • GhostedIC@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 hour ago

          Found Leo’s account.

          Seriously though why so hostile about this? Of course it’s made up, it’s a general rule of thumb, and it describes whether people are likely to look at a couple and say, “ew”.

      • jballs@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Nah I think it holds up. Bill Belichick, 73, was in the news for dating a 24 year old and it’s not only as creepy and gross, but also like she’s taking advantage of him by inserting herself into his interviews.

        If he were dating a 43 year old, I don’t think anyone would be nearly as concerned.

        • ma1w4re@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          9 hours ago

          This reminder me for some reason of how my grandfather cheated on his wife a few years ago and had a heart attack during sex. He’s like 80 or so.

          • Sc00ter@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            3 hours ago

            When you have heart procedures/ surgery, they tell you, “no sex for 6 weeks with your spouse, 8 weeks with anyone else.” Theres science backing up the extra strain/excitement of having sex with someone else

            • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 hours ago

              But honey, the doctor said I could have sex with other women if I waited 8 weeks after the surgery, so it’s not cheating!

    • Nikls94@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      13 hours ago

      Wow that actually makes sense.

      But then again, I’m born 1994, there’s not so many I can actually date. I have like 1990 - 1998 available, and they must be an only child or have siblings within that age as well, otherwise the interests are not overlapping enough to spend time together: those younger are TikTok addicted, those older are Facebook-relicts. I’m in limbo where I know all of that but don’t like anything.

      Edit: to those who downvoted, why?

      • AtariDump@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 hours ago

        …those younger are TikTok addicted, those older are Facebook-relicts.

        You’re being very assuming with people and that’s why the downvotes.

        Not every person will be “TikTok addicted” or “Facebook-relicts”, you’re just assuming they are which is only affecting your own chances finding someone.

        Try just getting to know someone first before you start assuming about their interests or what they do.

        … and they must be an only child or have siblings within that age as well, otherwise the interests are not overlapping enough to spend time together…

        Who says you have to spend time with your SO’s siblings for any great length of time? Parties and holidays you can get through, but it’s not like you’re going to go live with the family.

        You and your SO should both have your own friends and hobbies (in addition to joint friends/hobbies). I’m not trying to crap on having a relationship with your SO’s family, just that it’s not mandatory.

        I feel like removing these two arbitrary requirements would vastly increase your dating pool. I get that people are looking for traits in a potential partner (doesn’t smoke / drinks / poly / not-poly / uses Arch) but the ones you’ve picked are just self limiting

      • ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 hours ago

        The clumsy portmanteau of facebook and derelicts if I had to guess. That one is just dreadful. Go with Facebougoise or something, The Faceborg maybe (I actually like that one), something like that.

      • ɯᴉuoʇuɐ@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        9 hours ago

        to those who downvoted, why?

        Because of this part:

        they must be an only child or have siblings within that age as well, otherwise the interests are not overlapping enough to spend time together

      • abysmalpoptart@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        27
        ·
        edit-2
        2 hours ago

        Just for a little context, the minimum age being ((your age / 2)+7) is meant to be “this is the minimum age of someone you can date without it being creepy” (i believe it originated from the TV show how i met your mother)

        If you were born in 1994 you are either 30 or 31. Let’s call it 30 for easy math.

        30/2 = 15 15+7=22

        So anyone who is 22 or older fits the minimum age concept, which is anyone born in approx 2002/2003 or earlier. If you decided to include that, the extra 4-5 years does increase the dating pool quite a bit.

        I’m not telling you who to date, just giving a little context to the math since that’s what was brought up in the original comment.

        Edit: Lots of folks chiming in with some really good insight about the history of the math. Thank you all for that!

        Although the historical accounts seem to be math for the “ideal age” in a (probably female) partner and not “minimum age before it’s creepy” as it was presented in HIMYM, it’s really interesting to see how that equation has been used for over 100 years!

        • Denjin@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          7 hours ago

          No one knows the true origin of the idea but there’s a number of examples that predate how I met your mother by over a hundred years.

          The first published example is Max O’Rell in Her Royal Highness, Woman: And His Majesty—Cupid from 1901

          I heard the other day a very good piece of advice, which I should like to repeat here, as I endorse it thoroughly : A man should marry a woman half his age, plus seven. Try it at whatever age you like, and you will find it works very well, taking for granted all the while that, after all, a man as well as a woman is the age that he looks and feels.

        • Waraugh@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          7 hours ago

          It had to be a thing before how I met your mother, I remember it being a thing during school in the 80-90’s

          • abysmalpoptart@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            Totally fair, lots of folks have chimed in about it. Really interesting to see it’s over 100 years old (although more focused on ideal partner, not avoiding being creepy)

        • ikt@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          22
          ·
          13 hours ago

          (i believe it originated from the TV show how i met your mother)

          Although the provenance of the rule is unclear, it is sometimes said to have originated in France.[81] The rule appears in John Fox Jr.'s 1903 novel The Little Shepherd of Kingdom Come,[84] in American newspapers in 1931 attributed to Maurice Chevalier,[85] and in The Autobiography of Malcolm X, attributed to Elijah Muhammad.[86]

          In many early sources, the rule was primarily presented as a formula to calculate the ideal age of a female partner at the beginning of a heterosexual relationship. Frederick Locker-Lampson’s Patchwork from 1879 states the opinion “A wife should be half the age of her husband with seven years added.”[87] Max O’Rell’s Her Royal Highness Woman from 1901 gives the rule in the format “A man should marry a woman half his age, plus seven.”[88]

          https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_disparity_in_sexual_relationships

        • AlolanYoda@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          10 hours ago

          Invert this rule to get the maximum age you can date (defined as the person whose minimum age is your current age):

          min age = (your age / 2) + 7 max age = (your age * 2) - 14

          If you’re 30, then you can reasonably date people between 22 and 46. So the other guy can add even more years before 1990.

        • zout@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          9 hours ago

          Also, for the maximum age they are the younger one. So assuming age is 30, substract 7 and multiply the outcome by 2, maximum date age is 46…