private ids where always the scope of the privacy movement. However, it may as such present other challenges which can include age based discrimination. It as such must be implemented wisely.
Age is already being weaponised against us (child protection, etc), this shouldn’t be like that - We can already see what kind of power governments hold. Ageism is what will ultimately destroy us.
So even with those methods do you think they will use the age checking ethically? This isn’t a problem with privacy, but also with discrimination. Ageism is what’s going to occur.
We are played like fools, our tyrannical governments are treating us like dogs on a leash - slowly stripped off our dignity and self respect, and to what extent?
The vision of our future is a police state, a complete control of the populace like the slaves we are. This age weaponisation should’ve been a clear indication, something totally unjust and ageist is completely inexcusable.
You’re right, America always takes the podium even if it’s an international issue.
Thing is, we shouldn’t blame America for it, we should blame all tyrannical governments which oppress human rights. This isn’t the problem for the future, it is a present problem; authoritarianism is a threat to humanity.
Unfortunately, that’s what usually happens. Asking the “why” is the most fundamental thing here; it is what shapes who you are, and questions those moral views you have gained or has been projected on you.
The most important thing is, that you know the situation best. So basing your morals off of incorrect wording such as in reddit, will further drag you down.
Yes there are always consequences. However, this is the case where personal ethics are routinely projected into others, age gaps are demonised by default the same way how sexual preferences where before the 21st century. But either way, time should show what the result will be.
Agreed, everyone had their own morals on this and that is perfectly fine. It’s up to them to decide if that relationship is going to hold.
And of course there might be downsides just like there are going to be perceived upsides - it really depends on their interaction, as even same age groups can have major downsides.
I don’t quite agree with the replies. The statement “it matches experiences” is baseless as stated in my other reply.
In general, experience ≠ age. This is because experience is influenced by various physical factors such as opportunities, learning environments, etc. Not exactly by age.
That’s because it’s all based on assumptions and projected morals. Commonly treated as a ultimate truth not as a “rule of thumb” as it is destined to be - hostility is built in this “rule”.
In general, this rule essentially dictates the ethics of independent people. Because of this there is no description, it’s a requirement to say “ew”.
What’s interesting is this rule apparently originated from the early 1900s.
Exactly, this “rule” is really just equivalent to other forms of snake oil there is. It is baseless and completely made up.
OP doesn’t understand what cultural progression is. Of course different people gonna do stuff differently as time progresses, the class she was when you where in high school is just irrelevant.
This is the case where op just has skill issue, and is stuck in the past like a boomer he is.
I hate how relatable this is.
Exactly the situation I’m facing. Despite torrents being a popular choice, it just doesn’t provide an easy way to manage your seeds.
Of course I have found some potential solutions. Seedbox is one of them. There’s also the *arr suite, which is a more local solution that utilises hard links - but im not sure if it’ll be effective if you want to reencode.
I always appreciate an enthusiastic and educational response to situations like this.
Soft tissues leave marks on bones
Could you explain how they leave marks?
Idk man, maybe you’ve not been exposed to enough 4chan.
Or maybe he has experienced enough 4chan to the point where he realises those hidden meanings.
Well said.
I know AI usage is increasing, but I don’t understand how it allows ‘child images’ (which I assume is sexual abuse material) to be easily found.
Additionally, I’d want clarification on how those massive libraries which are over shared are related to oversharing.
It is becoming more aware that discrimination is rising rather than falling in this society. Laws like this explicitly increase the ageism within the society, and like all other individuals teens want to be treated equally; and do what they consider is ethically right.
Such laws will never stop underage viewing, as even in the mode discriminate society it is safe to say options are deemed to exist. And like adults which prefer to use legitimate stuff, it is naive to think teens will be absolutely willing to be stripped off their rights when the legitimacy turns hostile.