lemmy.yachts
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • Create Community
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 19 hours ago

UwU brat mathematician behavior

mander.xyz

message-square
95
fedilink
652

UwU brat mathematician behavior

mander.xyz

fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 19 hours ago
message-square
95
fedilink
alert-triangle
You must log in or # to comment.
  • Etterra@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Can somebody ELI5 this for my troglodyte writer brain?

  • iAvicenna@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    edit-2
    7 hours ago

    operative?

    Also mathematicians use i for imaginary, engineers use j. The story does not add up. I have never seen a single mathematician use j for imaginary.

    • jenesaisquoi@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Cannot confirm, we always used i.

    • SanicHegehog@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 hours ago

      imaJinary

      TIL engineers can’t spell for shit.

    • sartalon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      6 hours ago

      As an EE, I used both. Def not a mathematician though. Fuck that, I just plug variables into programs now.

      • the_tab_key@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 hours ago

        I have both mechanical and electrical backgrounds. MEs like I, EEs prefer j

  • itslilith@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 hours ago

    $\int dx f(x)$ is standard notation for physicists

    • cooligula@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 minutes ago

      But the post says before the integral, so I understand what they did would be $dx \int f(x)$, which is disgusting

    • jenesaisquoi@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Yes but everyone knows physicists like weird notations

  • Log in | Sign up@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Thank you for the belly laugh!

  • 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 🇮 @pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Me, a language/arts person: “Huh?”

    • axEl7fB5@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Web dev here. “Huh?”

      • jenesaisquoi@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        Webdev not knowing anything about computer science (and thus mathematics)? I am shocked. Shocked!

    • Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Medical here. “Huh?”

      • nfamwap@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        31 minutes ago

        Moron here. “Huh?”

  • Phoenix3875@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 hours ago

    I think rather d/dx is the operator. You apply it to an expression to bind free occurrences of x in that expression. For example, dx²/dx is best understood as d/dx (x²). The notation would be clear if you implement calculus in a program.

    • Billegh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      7 hours ago

      If not fraction, why fraction shaped?

      • ඞmir@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 hours ago

        If you use exterior calculus notation, with d = exterior derivative, everything makes so much more sense

  • vivalapivo@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    12 hours ago

    As a physicist I can’t understand why would anyone complain about a +jb or $\int dx f(x)$. Probably because we don’t fuck

    • RamblingPanda@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      10 hours ago

      As a software dude I can see you wrote a regex, I just can’t find out what you’re trying to match.

      • AusatKeyboardPremi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Pardon my denseness, but is this sarcasm? Since that is a TeX snippet.

        Why would a RegEx start with a $?

        • RamblingPanda@lemmynsfw.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Yeah, it is. I’m just working with what I have.

      • vivalapivo@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        9 hours ago

        Heeyy… So when you need to express something more, well, delicate than just code, you need to use math symbols. For that you can use tex expressions. Modern markdown supports it: just copy and paste the $…$ part into any render engine

        • RamblingPanda@lemmynsfw.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          9 hours ago

          I’m scared. I think I’ll generate some backend spec to calm down.

          • vivalapivo@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            9 hours ago

            Nooo… You should write spec and generate code, not the other way around

  • ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    73
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Is anyone doing anything tonight?

    • Randelung@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Something something distance calls for norm, not just squares.

      ||i||² + ||1||² = 2

    • bitcrafter@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      Imagining your death. :P

      But seriously, it’s perfectly sensible when remember that i is just the mathematical representation of “left turn”, just like -1 is the mathematical representation of “go backwards”-- and as we know, two left turns sends you backwards. So think about this triangle in the following way:

      Imagine you are a snail, starting at the origin. Now imagine that you walk forward 1 step along the horizontal line. Then you turn 90° to the left to start walking along the vertical line, but then, because you need to walk i steps along this line you take another 90° turn to the left, which means that you are now walking backwards and you end up back at the origin. How far away from the origin are you? Zero steps.

    • Log in | Sign up@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      This one made me laugh almost as much as the OP. Thank you!

    • serenissi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      14 hours ago

      no, d…do you have a plan?

  • CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    13 hours ago

    This is the kind of brat I can get behind. 😏

    • _g_be@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      12 hours ago

      😏

  • Zagorath@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    257
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Fake and gay.

    No way the engineer corrects the mathematician for using j instead of i.

    • TheSlad@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Right? They got that shit backwards. Op is a fraud. i is used in pure math, j is used in engineering.

    • Kogasa@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      12 hours ago

      The mathematician also used “operative” instead of, uh, something else, and “associative” instead of “commutative”

      • Zagorath@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 hours ago

        “operative” instead of, uh, something else

        I think they meant “operand”. As in, in the way dy/dx can sometimes be treated as a fraction and dx treated as a value.

        • Chrobin@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          14 minutes ago

          I think you mean operator. The operand is the target of an operator.

    • LeFrog@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      45
      ·
      14 hours ago

      As an engineer I fully agree. Engineers¹ aren’t even able to do basic arithmetics. I even cannot count to 10.

      ¹ Except maybe Electrical engineers. They seem to be quite smart.

      • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        35
        ·
        13 hours ago

        Engineer here, I can definitely count to 10 tho

        0 1 10

        • gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          9 hours ago

          0 1 everything that comes after is simply summarizes as “many”

        • HessiaNerd@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 hours ago

          deleted by creator

      • thomasloven@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        11 hours ago

        10? That’s the name some put to 1e1, right?

      • gnutrino@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        29
        ·
        14 hours ago

        Electrical engineers are the ones that use j though (because i is used for current)

      • exasperation@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        11 hours ago

        Except maybe Electrical engineers.

        Yup, I can count just fine to the 10th number in a zero-indexed counting system: black, brown, red, orange, yellow, green, blue, violet, gray, white.

        • alt_xa_23@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          7 hours ago

          https://xkcd.com/227/

      • Baguette@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        13 hours ago

        The inner machinations of an electrical engineer is too complicated for me to understand, I think they might be thinking on a higher order to understand these circuits

        Thats why I barely passed my electrical engineering class lol

    • Hoimo@ani.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      40
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      18 hours ago

      How do we know it’s gay though? OP could be a girl (male)

      • SippyCup@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        54
        ·
        17 hours ago

        Because it’s 4chan. And there are no women on the Internet on 4chan

      • ByteJunk@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        13 hours ago

        Newfag.

        (sorry! seemed like the appropriate 4chan reply)

      • floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Sure OP is a girl. Guy In Real Life

    • NeatNit@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      17 hours ago

      My thoughts exactly lol

  • _stranger_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    79
    ·
    16 hours ago

    sado-mathochist

    • Seasm0ke@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Well done, truly

  • OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Better plot than 50 Shades of Grey

    • xx3rawr@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      6 hours ago

      hehe plot. getit? math and graphs and shit

      • OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        5 hours ago

        Lmfao kill yourself

  • Thordros [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    13 hours ago

    I believe the correct terminology is denominator mathematician.

  • PM_ME_VINTAGE_30S [he/him]@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    140
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Wait bottom mathematican is using j=√-1 instead of i and not the engineer? Because I’m EE gang, and all my homies use j.

    • wetbeardhairs@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      40
      ·
      17 hours ago

      The fun starts when you study quaternions

      i^2 = j^2 = k^2 = ijk = −1

      • pticrix@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        15 hours ago

        This can’t be real

        • HappyFrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          ·
          15 hours ago

          They’re actually very useful: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quaternion

          • qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            15
            ·
            14 hours ago

            (…I think you may have gotten whooshed…)

            • HappyFrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              13 hours ago

              Hehe, maybe a little, but wanted to share just in case someone didn’t know :3

              • Jarix@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                10 hours ago

                I clicked your link, I barely made it out of highschool so I have no idea what any of it means, but I like reading things I shouldn’t understand anyway, sometines it’s so interesting even without understanding.

                So I thank you!

        • CodexArcanum@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          edit-2
          15 hours ago

          It gets worse actually. You can define a number system using any power of 2 amount of i-like units in a similar relationship to quaternions using the Cayley-Dickson construction

          Fascinatingly, you lose some property of the algebra at each step. Quaternions aren’t commutative: ABC != CBA. Octonians aren’t associative: (AB)C != A(BC). Once you get into 16 i’s with subscripts, it really gets crazy.

          (Also, I just got the joke. Damnit @[email protected] your serious answer threw me off!)

          • HappyFrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            10 hours ago

            Hehe, yeah, the joke was too good :P

        • serenissi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          14 hours ago

          this isn’t real

    • GandalfTheDumb@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      58
      ·
      18 hours ago

      That part also got me really confused. All the mathematicans I know use i while engineers use i or j depending on the kind of engineer. I’ve never seen a Pikachu engineer using anything other than j.

      • ryedaft@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 hours ago

        OPs boyfriend is obviously an i engineer and hates j engineers. No one can stay angry at mathematicians - engineers on the other hand…

      • Ganbat@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Pikachu engineer

        That’s a fucking favorite now. Keeping that in my back pocket.

    • grysbok@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      17 hours ago

      [Lapsed] mechanical engineering gang checking in. I was also surprised. Though, tbh, I think it came down to personal preference of the professor more than field-wide consensus.

    • bisby@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      18 hours ago

      I agree. Clearly i is current. What is this i=√-1 nonsense.

    • affiliate@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      14 hours ago

      a real mathematician would use (0, 1) instead of i

  • lemmy_outta_here@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    71
    ·
    18 hours ago

    NGL, this is hot.

    • AnarchoEngineer@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      17 hours ago

      I’m a mechanical engineering student with a math minor and I’m a switch so yeah, I’d take either side of this

Science Memes@mander.xyz

science_memes@mander.xyz

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: [email protected]

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don’t throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

  • [email protected]

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

  • [email protected]
  • [email protected]
  • [email protected]

Biology and Life Sciences

  • [email protected]
  • [email protected]
  • [email protected]
  • [email protected]
  • [email protected]
  • [email protected]
  • [email protected]
  • [email protected]
  • [email protected]
  • [email protected]
  • [email protected]
  • [email protected]
  • [email protected]
  • [email protected]
  • [email protected]
  • [email protected]
  • [email protected]
  • [email protected]
  • [email protected]
  • [email protected]
  • [email protected]
  • [email protected]
  • [email protected]
  • [email protected]
  • !reptiles and [email protected]

Physical Sciences

  • [email protected]
  • [email protected]
  • [email protected]
  • [email protected]
  • [email protected]
  • [email protected]
  • [email protected]
  • [email protected]
  • [email protected]

Humanities and Social Sciences

  • [email protected]
  • [email protected]
  • [email protected]
  • [email protected]

Practical and Applied Sciences

  • !exercise-and [email protected]
  • [email protected]
  • !self [email protected]
  • [email protected]
  • [email protected]
  • [email protected]

Memes

  • [email protected]
  • [email protected]

Miscellaneous

  • [email protected]
  • [email protected]
Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 3.92K users / day
  • 7.7K users / week
  • 12.1K users / month
  • 24.4K users / 6 months
  • 1 local subscriber
  • 15.8K subscribers
  • 4.91K Posts
  • 75.4K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • Salamander@mander.xyz
  • fossilesque@mander.xyz
  • SciBot@mander.xyz
  • fossilesque@lemmy.dbzer0.com
  • BE: 0.19.7
  • Modlog
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org