Why would a mathematician use j for imaginary numbers and why would engineer be mad at them?

😭

wait did Donald invent covfefe 😭

Covfefe

Welcome to tthe NHK made me try to be more social. I’m still pretty anxious but it’s slowly getting y little better.

Me

There’s nothing honorable on killing and dying for no reason.

Rare wholesome greentext

Will to live

I agree with you, mostly because it seems logical to me, like if you torture a person for years for nonsensical crime like possession, how do you think it’s gonna turn out? Though, I think that much more important is to ensure that they have the ability to put their lives back together after release, since in the modern day, it’s practically impossible for anyone with a record to get a decent job.

I mean, I doubt all prisoners are locked in these prisons. I think these prisons like Halden are rewards to which the best behaving prispners get transported to. Still, the criminal justice system in these countries is awesome.

But it highlights a societal problem. How supply and demand is put above everything. How people who work hard and could improve society end up in a place like that because society thinks supporting them and their fields that don’t bring immediate profit is cOmMuNiSm somehow (if u think that, well you’re the prime example of why we need to encourage college education in humanities specifically)

Imagine applying for a job and having a cat get the job instead of you

Eh, it doesn’t matter here. SCOTUS decided that the federal government has the right to regulate weed, even within state borders (Gonzales V Raich)

But their mom says they’re cool

I mean, assuming the OP lives in the US, there is still the federal ban…

We usually don’t like saying that due to a phenomeome called ‘Trial by public opinion’. He has not yet been proven guilty beyond reasonable doubt, neither can you prove so. Decreeing someone guilty, even outside of court, without proof, can negatively influence jurors to deliver a guilty verdict even if the defense creates a reasonable doubt.

I’m not saying I agree with the doctrine; in fact I think it’s unjust and would prefer it being tossed, though I seriously doubt he has any chance of succeeding on this claim, especially with the current SCOTUS. And I doubt the state’s lawyers are that incompetent as to ignore it.

deleted by creator

Under the Double Sovereignty doctrine, the Double Jeopardy clause doesn’t apply in this case tho. Hence, you can be charged for the same offense twice in both stage and federal court.