Editing to let people know that I will be blocking anyone who feels the need to tell me why this graph is inaccurate. I truly don’t care, but feel free to chime in with your useless take and land a spot on my block list! 🙂

  • Mio@feddit.nu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    29 minutes ago

    You have zoomed in. I want to see the y axel from 0. It have increased with 10% of the users.

  • NιƙƙιDιɱҽʂ@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    For other nerds that absolutely hate dishonest and biased graphs, I present the normalized data. Wow. What a vertical line. 🤦‍♀️

    • Fedizen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 hour ago

      its the federation effect in action. I expect pixel fed to get a slow trickle of new users as legacy social media cages and milks its current users for ads.

      Despite the misleading graph from OP, the slow uptick seems to be common with federated social media because there’s little incentive to make viral posts to sell ads.

  • rekabis@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Let’s hope the mobile apps become real mobile apps instead of web page wrappers.

    I can understand if you build a site that allows itself to be pinned to your device as if it were an app. That’s a great way to get a product onto devices before you have time+effort to build a native app.

    It’s quite another thing to have an actual app with a highly visible GUI wrapper whose only purpose is to connect to and display a specific website.

    Like, c’mon.

    • korendian@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      I honestly prefer other sites/apps anyway. Tusky is a great app for connecting all your fediverse accounts in one place, and friendica has a filter by image option that essentially turns it into Pixelfed.

  • arglebargle@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Pixelfed is federated, an account can be made with Mastodon to log into different servers. But it seems different from lemmy in that joining one instance doesn’t seem to provide you with a method to view other instances and pick and choose as part of your feed. I think some people find that confusing. Any comments on that?

    • mastazi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 hour ago

      Yes, it’s the most confusing part, if you want to discover Pixelfed accounts from other servers, you have to go to another server’s home page, then click on “Explore” which will show you popular posts by that server’s users. I have done this and now I follow a bunch of accounts from other servers, but the process is very convoluted and the average user would not bother I guess.

      The web version of Pixelfed does have a “Global Feed” page but that’s 99% Mastodon posts because the “Global Feed” is actually global relative to the whole Fediverse.

      • arglebargle@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        37 minutes ago

        Yes, I think for new users that is very confusing. I find that somewhat confusing and I think I have an idea what’s going on.

    • korendian@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Lemmy is unique on the fediverse, in that it has communities that you can subscribe to. The closest equivalent is community groups on Friendica. Pixelfed is more similar to Mastodon in that you can follow individual accounts, or hashtags/search terms, which is how you subscribe to different content in your feed. For example, I follow #catsofmastodon and see all posts tagged with that in my feed. Hashtagging your posts is very important if you want it to be seen. Lemmy is more oriented towards discussions, which is why communities make more sense in this context than on Pixelfed or Mastodon.

  • rglullis@communick.news
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    329
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 day ago

    Lies, damn lies, and graphs that don’t have the Y-axis starting at 0.

    10% growth in a day is nice, but far from a revolution. Let’s see this trend going for a month.

    • morgunkorn@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      1 day ago

      the head dev Dan Sup mentioned the number of active users jumping from 6k to 30k. we’ll see how it holds, but there is strength in numbers, people only stay if other people see what they post there. i have good hopes and really want to ditch instagram

        • aasatru@kbin.earth
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          47
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          I don’t think anyone here is arguing that the entire world will be using pixelfed by the end of the year, and that its usage will expand to other galaxies by the end of the decade.

          It’s a comment about the current growth curve, and it is both accurate and interesting.

          • rglullis@communick.news
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            23
            arrow-down
            11
            ·
            1 day ago

            Lemmy had the same jump in numbers during the Reddit Exodus. Mastodon had a huge boost when Elon bought Twitter.

            Every spike has been a followed by a slide back to baseline in less than a couple of months. After you’ve seen it happen so many times, it is no longer interesting.

            • xapr [he/him]@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              23
              ·
              1 day ago

              I don’t think that either Mastodon or Lemmy slid back anywhere near as far as back to baseline? Sure, usage went down, perhaps even significantly compared to the peaks, but I think that both retained a lot more users than they had before their respective spikes. I’m an example of someone who came into Mastodon with the Twitter exodus and into Lemmy with the Reddit exodus, and I’ve stayed for both.

              • rglullis@communick.news
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                1 day ago

                I don’t mean that the numbers went exactly back where they were. I mean that every spike was followed by a steady decline.

                Compare it with Bluesky now, or compare it with Reddit during Digg’s meltdown. Their growth curves will look like an S-curve, not this series of discrete jumps followed by 40-60% loss.

                • Fedo ¶@www.foxyhole.io
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  24 hours ago

                  @[email protected] tbh we shouldn’t expect the adoption curve of any Fediverse software to be somewhat similar to the ones of centralised social networks, since Fediverse completely misses the commercial aspect that encourage key users to stay in the platform easing communities to stick to it as well. My guess is that without the action of commercial dynamics, the situation wouldn’t be so different from the jumps-and-losses moments we’re used to

            • aasatru@kbin.earth
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              51
              ·
              1 day ago

              The fact that you believe these platforms were the same before and after these events makes it sound like you were not, in fact, there to see it happen. In my experience, it permanently changed both platforms, transforming them from weird niche sites to genuine alternatives.

              That said, what you find interesting or not is not any of my business.

                • aasatru@kbin.earth
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  10
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  Yeah, I know I shouldn’t bother. I am just annoyed by the misconception that all graphs should always start in 0 on the Y axis, as if it was some law of nature. Shouldn’t allow myself to get dragged in further. :)

              • rglullis@communick.news
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                edit-2
                1 day ago

                I am here since before the Reddit backout and I am on Mastodon since 2018. Lemmy was at 15k MAU, went up to over 125k and now is 1/3 of that. Mastodon had 1M 575k something before Elon, hit up close to 2M 1.5M and now is sitting around 800k. (edit: I was looking at the overall charts and used wrong figures. Corrected now.)

                Sure, if your reference point is waaaay before the spikes then what we have now seem “a lot”. However, my point is that these spikes are far from being indicative of mass adoption.

                • xapr [he/him]@lemmy.sdf.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  Mastodon had 1M something before Elon, hit up close to 2M and now is sitting around 800k.

                  This stat is really surprising. Do you by any chance have a link where I can see this data?

            • Kichae@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              9
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              Cool. You… don’t have to engage in discussions that bore you. Why waste your time?

      • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 day ago

        I’ve never been on IG but I’m strongly considering a pFed account. Am I churn or am I miniscule net-new?

        And yeah, it’s a hope that the rumoured meta toxicity is somehow magically not on pFed. I wanna see my nephew’s designs and art but not the influencerati junk I fear is on the captive platform.

    • korendian@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      32
      ·
      1 day ago

      The y axis starting zero does not change the fact that it’s exponentially growing right now. Filter that link posted below for 120 days and it is still a nearly straight vertical line of growth.

      • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        1 day ago

        It’s not exponentially growing. At best, the growth rate has exponentially increased. These are VERY different things.

        It was exponentially growing, the platform would come screeching to a halt and crash.

        • Eatspancakes84@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          12 hours ago

          Wait what? The whole point of exponential growth is that all it’s derivatives/integrals are also exponential.

        • korendian@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          25
          ·
          1 day ago

          Jesus fucking Christ, you people are miserably pedantic. Nothing about my original post is wrong, so please kindly shut the fuck up with your “well achtually” takes.

          • NιƙƙιDιɱҽʂ@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 hours ago

            You’re the one that made a false claim with a biased graph…it’s okay to be wrong. I’m wrong all the time. No need to be so hostile about it. You could even edit your OP and add in the graph I threw together that normalizes the data. It’s still a significant bump in users, which is cool.

            • korendian@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 hour ago

              The primary reason I am getting hostile is because there is a chorus of dumbasses who think they’re being clever by pointing out that graphs look different when you view them on different time scales. No shit Sherlock. It doesn’t negate the fact that this is probably the most significant increase in users the app has ever seen, which is really all my post is saying. On the graph, the line is vertical. Even zooming out 4 months, it’s still vertical. Maybe zooming out further will make it less vertical, but that is beside the point. It’s still growing fast. Even on your graph you can see the shift. Getting called a liar and having people try to minimize a significant trend is not something I will just let slide off my back. Keep arguing all you want, you’re wasting your time.

              • NιƙƙιDιɱҽʂ@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                15 minutes ago

                Ah, so you don’t actually understand why you’re being called out. It isn’t the timescale that “the dumbasses” are calling you out on. It’s the Y-axis.

                If you cut off the bottom, you can make any graph look vertical. Still, it’s not insignificant and it’s definitely a turn which is cool, but this is why people are upset at your post title.

              • rglullis@communick.news
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                38 minutes ago

                The problem is less about the chart and the fact that you are taking a jump from a very short interval and trying to pass it off as something completely unprecedented.

                Getting called a liar and having people try to minimize a significant trend

                “Lies, damn lies and statistics” is not about calling you a liar, but how people can selectively use different data points to present information that supports their thesis or confirms their biases. I wasn’t calling you a liar, I am just disagreeing with you about this being “significant”.

                If this growth rate holds for the next two weeks, then I’ll gladly change my tune and start talking about a trend. But so emphatically making projections out of one or two data points is a fool’s errand.

            • korendian@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              9 hours ago

              Sorry for getting annoyed when people needlessly correct others to make themselves seem smart.

              • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                7 hours ago

                Eh… It’s important to not spread misinformation and correct it when you see it.

                It’s also important to just be ok with being wrong and get on with your life. No emotion needed.

                • korendian@lemmy.worldOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  6 hours ago

                  I am very willing to admit when I’m wrong. However, the original post is not misinformation. The line on the graph is nearly vertical. That is objectively true. Even going back 120 days, the last few days are clearly vertical, and a sharp jump in users from previous time periods.

                  People just like to correct people to make themselves feel smart, and I have very little patience for that sort of thing. If someone makes a legitimate correction or proves to me that I am wrong, I am happy to be corrected, but needless and inaccurate corrections are just irritating.

          • M137@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            15
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            Ah, the classic response to being proven wrong on the Internet. Have a hissy fit like a 5-year-old and call everyone pedantic etc. You were objectively wrong but there’s no problem with that, everyone is wrong about stuff all the time, the difference is how you handle that. You either act like a mentally grown person and just go “oh, damn, I didn’t know that, thanks for correcting me” or act like you’ve done. No one is out to say that pixelfed isn’t growing, but you’re misrepresenting facts and then being a fucking child about being told so.

            • PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 day ago

              Actually, pedantry is correcting people for things that didn’t actually need correcting because everyone understood the meaning from the context, so there isn’t any reason for him to thank you because you didn’t actually do anything of value.

            • korendian@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              9
              ·
              1 day ago

              I’m not calling everyone pedantic. I’m calling you and the other guy who chimed in with pedantic takes pedantic. You can claim you’re right all you want, but nothing about the title of the post “Pixelfed user count has gone vertical” is inaccurate. Whether it’s the user count or the user growth rate that is exponential is irrelevant. Nothing about my post is misrepresenting the fact that on the graph, the number of users is going nearly straight up, exactly as the title describes. Feel free to keep trying to correct me, but I know I’m right because I have eyes and can identify basic shapes. I am very willing to admit when I am wrong, but this is not one of those cases.

            • korendian@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              8
              ·
              1 day ago

              They seem to be serious. The more concerning thing is that people are agreeing with them. I guess common sense is not so common.

              • Blaze (he/him)@feddit.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                1 day ago

                I got the same criticism about a similar graph a while ago. Numbers are on the left, people can clearly see how big of a change the graph shows, and I have no way to present the graph differently as it’s straight from the website, but people still want to argue about it

                • PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  9
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  Tbf graphics like that are commonly used to be deceitful, because people don’t actually check the numbers on the left.

                  But in this case I think it probably doesn’t matter lol

      • aasatru@kbin.earth
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        The only thing worse than misrepresentation of statistics is completely misguided criticism of statistical representation.

        While we’re at it, the X axis doesn’t start at zero either.

        • korendian@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          16
          ·
          1 day ago

          It’s the perfect combo of karma farming and “well, achtually” to make your blood boil. Good thing karma isn’t a thing on here from what I can tell.

  • Skiluros@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    184
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    To be fair, the Y-Axis doesn’t start from zero.

    That being said, 10% account growth in 2 days is pretty solid. Let’s hope both account creation and engagement metrics (MAUs/DAUs) keep growing.

    EDIT: Correct Axis type.

        • danc4498@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          1 day ago

          I actually wish this were true. Sure, they would show the snippet for the time we care about, but they MUST provide the source graph that contains all data back to the Big Bang. Specifically the Plank Era, we don’t want a graph where time doesn’t exist, that would make the graph useless.

        • Pornacount128@lemmynsfw.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 hours ago

          I know this might not have been the intent of the post, but this is super fucking helpful. I’ve been using blender and Unity and didn’t understand why I was getting confused around grid cords, it’s cuz I didn’t realize the orientation changed (I just move the arrows around mostly, just a noob). By any chance is there anyway to change the orientation? Hopefully?

          • barsoap@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 hours ago

            Even if you can (e.g. change your projection matrix in a custom shader) you don’t want to mess with it because a lot of things assume the standard is used. The proper, unconfusing, way to deal with it is to import/export to a format that itself has a defined coordinate system, like gltf.

      • Skiluros@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Yes, of course the Y axis.

        I work with charts/vizualizations/data a lot, but for whatever reason I reflexively mistake X/Y a lot. It’s not even funny.

        • aasatru@kbin.earth
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 day ago

          I make the same mistake all the time for some reason, though I know which is which. I have a theory the reason is that the X axis is often used to plot years (Y), which messes with my brain ever so slightly.

          That said, I don’t think the Y axis should necessarily start in zero in a graph that seeks to show the pattern of growth rather than the number of users in absolute terms. If anything, a longer X axis would have been more useful, in order to show how unusual such a growth pattern is.

          • Skiluros@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            This is like a weird personal thing that I can’t even explain. For whatever reason, the Y axis becomes labelled as X in my mind in random situations. And I use charts (and other data visualizations a lot).

            The funny thing is when I am thinking of X, I don’t have this urge to call it Y. If I am looking at horizontal, X is the first thing that comes to mind. But not with Y.

    • Sabin10@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Isn’t that a 1‰ growth or am I mathing wrong?

      Edit: I’m wrong and that’s why I shouldn’t comment first thing in the morning. The math is mathing, I’m just not braining.

    • past@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      Starting the y-axis zero wouldn’t change the shape of the curve at all, but it would make the increase seem less dramatic.

      • moody@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 day ago

        It’s a ~10% increase, but the scale makes it look like the count shot up by 10x at first glance. I know that’s why you always need to look at the axis labels, but graphs like this are purposely presented this way because they’re easy to misinterpret for the average person.

  • Zier@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    71
    ·
    1 day ago

    Just a FYI, Dan who made Pixelfed also does Loops and a few other Fedi projects in case people want more cool stuff to play with.

    • bishbosh@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      What is the general outlook on others helping him build them out? I would hate to see tons of the energy dissipate because it was one guy trying his damnedest to out compete tech companies on two fronts.

      • Zier@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        12 hours ago

        I’m not that sure on what kind of crew he may or may not have.

  • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    1 day ago

    I signed up, though I generally don’t like following individuals and much prefer groups or communities like Lemmy. Gotta support independent social media.

        • coldsideofyourpillow@lemmy.cafe
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          this is probably the intended method to use mastodon, if you’re trying to follow individual accounts you’re just gonna suffer.

          I also found actually taking time to find an instance that you vibe with (in my case, jorts.horse) really helps to keep stuff interesting in your Local timeline. As a bonus, it also furthers decentralization :)

            • ijgwin@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 day ago

              Why does the instance make a big difference? I thought the point in federation is that the instance does NOT matter because everything shows up across instances? Genuinely curious and would appreciate if someone could explain.

              • coldsideofyourpillow@lemmy.cafe
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                11 hours ago

                while your Feed won’t matter as it’s chronological and based on your followed hashtags, as @[email protected] pointed out, your chosen instance will make an impact on your local feed.

                It’s kinda like how you can make an account on lemmy.ml and still connect to any* instance, but you’ll probably still have a harder time finding non-tankies.

                *if they haven’t defederated, that is
              • L3ft_F13ld!@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                19 hours ago

                So, your home instance is gonna have a “vibe”. Each instance is focused on different things and has different people so the Local feed will be very different. Different instances also block different things and have different rules.

                Once you start following some hashtags, it matters less. Like you said, it’s all mostly available from anywhere.

  • chaospatterns@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    I tried self hosting Pixelfed but gave up because it wouldn’t work. I’m used to Docker containers that are able to just start up by themselves, but the guide didn’t work for me. Maybe it’s time to try again.

    • poVoq@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      1 day ago

      Make sure you use a MariaDB or MySQL database. Despite what the (very incomplete) docu says, Postgres support is broken.

      • saplyng@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        23 hours ago

        Really? I assumed postgres was the default for basically all open source projects

    • PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Because news broke that Meta lobbied for the TikTok ban. So people are now boycotting Meta platforms like Facebook and Instagram. Since Pixelfed is an Instagram clone and recently launched the app, it has gained a ton of popularity. The timing of the app launch honestly couldn’t have been better, because it gave all of the fleeing Instagram users a nice convenient place to land.

    • Mechanite@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 day ago

      I just signed up after seeing an article saying links to the website are being blocked by Instagram (IIRC). I figured it must be worth looking into if they’ve gone that far

      • PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        I think it’s been out for a while.

        Anyways, when I try to log into the main recommended server (where I already have an account), before I even get to the login page, it gives me this error

        Which is a pretty funny thing for the official app to say about the official main instance 🤣

        Instead I just installed the PWA from the browser. It works ok.