Not happy, just resigned to reality

He’s just never tried to say something which wasn’t allowed

It’s this photo (sfw), it’s as old as the hills. Lots of people used to have it as a profile pic because of exactly that reaction when it’s a thumbnail. I hunted for a while but couldn’t find the original source, maybe someone else knows or has better search-fu than me.

That’s why blood is red, it’s all the rust from the oxygen we breathe

I didn’t see anything to see that these aberrations indicated anything about a type of phone? They’re unique for each lens…

Most of the modifications to aosp in graphene are security improvements, so it’s at least somewhat better than any other android

In theory, very bad. In practice, also very bad.

because the withdrawal also kills

Ah, you might be thinking of alcohol. Nicotine withdrawal just makes a very strong craving but there is no physical danger.

Oh, I see, you’re just a troll. Well, you got me this time I guess.

No u

No, that’s wrong. Reading back further only shows that this person thinks locking up Hillary would be fine specifically and only if she covered up for Epstein, not any of that stuff in the other comment, which would be political.

You’ve completely lost the plot.

That’s not a nice thing to say.

I don’t see any way of reading those posts which I can interpret the way you said though. Which words are you specifically referencing when you say that

@[email protected] was saying is that Hilary Clinton shouldn’t be exempt from …

?

I bring your attention again to the comment I replied to, which reads:

Those are political things. Those are things she should have been voted out of power for, not locked up for.

(Emphasis mine)

This is in a direct response to @[email protected] 's comment listing several things which are firmly in the category of “atrocities”.

So how exactly do you reach your interpretation?

Okay, you tell me what they are saying here then?

The comment is still there, I can still read it, you could too if you wanted to

Yes they did lol, the first thing I replied to was

Those are political things. Those are things she should have been voted out of power for, not locked up for.

Crimes against humanity are not “just political things”.

I mean I’m not talking about who is worse than who. For the record I do think Trump is far worse than either Clinton. But I absolutely reject that that somehow means it’s fine to authorise death squads etc. or that it’s somehow “not important enough” to remember all the horrible shit that happened under the Obama admin.

I wasn’t talking about who is better or worse than who. Do you actually think nobody less bad than trump should face any kind of justice?

Edited: clarity

Don’t worry, I want to go after the fascists. But I reject the assertion that making life worse for Americans is somehow more morally wrong than making life worse for Libyans. In fact, I will go so far as to say that if you are willing to hand wave away atrocities as “status quo shit” then it makes sense that fascism is where things end up.

Those are things she should have been voted out of power for, not locked up for.

Everything is political, my friend. She should absolutely face consequences for her role in the heinous war crimes committed while she was secretary of state.

They were joking, they “went from 2-5 bugs per day to ten times that!”