• rhacer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    113
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    30 days ago

    But it IS how we see prices. If there weren’t science behind it, they wouldn’t be doing it.

    • PriorityMotif@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      64
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      30 days ago

      A lot of marketing strategies are pseudoscience. Just like a lot police investigation practices or body language assumptions.

          • Kidplayer_666@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            30
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            30 days ago

            The CEO decided that clients were smart intelligent people and treated people as adults. Aka, no discounts, no 99 pricing, it just costs what it costs, as low as we can make it, plus our margin.

            JC Penny was already not too well, this helped sink them

            • TehWorld@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              23
              ·
              30 days ago

              It was less about the .99 pricing and more about “Sale” pricing and ‘coupons’. Retailers will put a pair of pants on “Sale” for 50% off 51 weeks out of the year and people think they’re getting a great deal whereas when it’s not half off, they just don’t buy.

            • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              11
              ·
              30 days ago

              Poor guy. Tried to do some good in the world and paid the price for it. Nobody ever went broke overestimating the stupidity of the average person.

    • PriorityMotif@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      30 days ago

      It is kind of a dick move when companies overcharge for shipping. I only charge calculated shipping on large or heavy items because those are the ones that vary a lot and I don’t want someone in zone 8 (like Southern California or even someone in HI buying it and shipping costing more than they paid. If it’s under 1 lb then I just give free shipping and bake it into the price.

      • moonbunny@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        30 days ago

        This reminds me of my early shopping days using EBay, where it wasn’t uncommon for sellers to under-price their products so they show up near the top of the price (cheapest-most expensive) sort pile, and then charge an outrageous amount in shipping.

        I’ve found that almost always (at the time), that the seller offering free or low cost shipping was usually cheaper.

        • PriorityMotif@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          29 days ago

          That was because their fees were based on the sale price of the item minus the shipping. So they were only paying fees on 1 cent. They changed the fees so that the total sale including shipping is calculated.

    • Mercuri@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      29 days ago

      Part of it is that there’s less hidden costs. I like it when it’s just “the total is $30” instead of “there’s $8 shipping and a $2 service fee and then $4 in taxes and…”

      I’ve also seen some online stores lure in a customer with a really cheap initial price and then on the last page just slam them with insane shipping and handling fees hoping that the customer either doesn’t notice or feels too invested at this point to cancel their purchase.

      But yes, part of it is also people are stupid when they see the word “free” as if the store wouldn’t move the cost somewhere else.

    • Jackthelad@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      30 days ago

      I don’t understand people who won’t pay £5 for shipping, but will instead spend another £15 on something they don’t need so they get free shipping.

      All you’ve done is lost money.

  • OneWomanCreamTeam@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    29 days ago

    From my experience working in retail I’ve seen people say out loud something like “oh, it’s only 4 dollars!” When the sticker says $4.99. This shit apparently works on a lot of people for some reason.

  • volvoxvsmarla @lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    29 days ago

    My husband is awful in that regard. He sees the first digit only and then rounds it down. “It’s just 30€” - it’s 39,99€. “It’s like 200€” - it’s 289,90€, “5000€” - 5999€. I love him to pieces but I don’t trust any of his numbers.

  • BruceTwarzen@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    30 days ago

    These dumbasses thinks this works on us smart people. Anyway, gotta go fight some people on black friday for shit i don’t even need nor afford

    • Snowclone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      29 days ago

      Worked in pricing for a big retailer, it 100% works and retailers don’t even like doing it, but it’s basically a necessity to get baseline sales. It’s WAY easier to have simple even number prices that calculate easily and get percent off sales and clearance prices that make sense. Really the only items you see it on are items competing with other retailers, so kraft mayo that every store has vs. A store brand soda you don’t care about volume on. The Mayo you better have $5.99 instead of $6.00 or it looks like you’re ripping them off. And even if they sell it got $4.99 it still keeps people thinking it’s a complex price difference rather than an even number they can compare more easily.

  • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    29 days ago

    I generally round up to nearest bigger number or close to that. $19.99 is $20. $23.99 would probably be $25. $180 would just be $200.

    No real rhyme or reason, just the bigger the number the more I fudge the “real” price upwards thanks to sales tax and a “can I really afford this?” factor.

  • PugJesus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    29 days ago

    I’m not sure it works on me. Not because I’m some super human resistant to advertising (I’m not) but because I’m so bad at math that when they start asking me about anything involving small change I tune out and overestimate by 50% rounded into nice whole numbers.

    “This is 19.99”

    “Okay so it’s basically 30$.”

    It gives me nice surprises sometimes when I get my receipt.

        • Sludgeyy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          29 days ago

          You can remove the decimal then add it back at the end

          15.50

          Is

          1500

          Half would be 775

          Or 7.75

          • cheers_queers@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            29 days ago

            yep, and figure out what 20% of your bill is by taking 10% and double it. saves my ass every time i gotta tip lol

            • Sludgeyy@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              29 days ago

              You can take 1% of anything, then multiply as well.

              Like 7% of 15.50

              1% is .155 (10% is moving decimal to left once, 1% is twice)

              .155 × 7 = 1.083

              That’s a hard one to do in your head, but .155 × 7 is easier to do on paper than 15.50 × .07.

              Say something is 49.99 and 7% off. 1% is .5. .5 ×7 = 3.5. You could probably do that in your head. Otherwise, good luck trying to do 7% of 50 in your head.

              Edit: Hmm. So you could also do 3.5% of 100 instead of 7% of 50. That would have been the easiest way to do that one.

              Bonus: I thought I’d mention 11s. They are my favorite thing in math because they are so easy and you seem like a math wizard to anyone.

              Say you have 42 × 11. That’s 462.

              You just split apart the 4 and 2, add 4 and 2, then stick it in the middle.

              Something like 67 × 11. Where the digits add >10.

              6…7, 6+7=13, 6+1…3…7. So 737.

  • Sixty@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    29 days ago

    The amount of times I’ve watched Youtubers say something like “35 dollars” while showing an image that shows the price as $35.96 happens too often for me to side with OP lol, sorry.

  • TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    29 days ago

    It never works on me. I was taught at a very early age that pricing down by one cent of one dollar is a psychological trick and that I should round up to the nearest whole number.

      • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        29 days ago

        On people who are actively trying to compensate for it, or did you just mean the overall population?

        • shneancy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          29 days ago

          same way placebo still works (to a degree) even when you know it’s placebo

          your subconcious is not logical, and no amount of conscious logic will fully defeat its influence

          to think yourself immune is foolish and dangerous, that’s when you allow it to work even better as you “logically” explain away every manipulation you were influenced by, and convince yourself you made a decision fully by yourself. The danger gets even hotter when it comes to political propaganda that uses the exact same tricks as marketing

      • TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        29 days ago

        Yes, for the general population. Otherwise, companies will stop the psychological pricing. Same with corporate snooping to see our shopping and grocery habits and then send us with targeted ads.

        • 9bananas@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          29 days ago

          that’s the important caveat:

          it does NOT work on everyone, but that’s irrelevant.

          if it works on even 1% of people, but has zero effect on everyone else, companies would still use it everywhere anyways.

          a 1% difference over even just a couple thousand customers adds up over time.

          so, no, it doesn’t work on everyone, and it doesn’t have to.

          it just has to work on some people, and not deter any more people than it works on.

          if anyone wonders when it does and does not work: like most of these psych-tricks the effect mostly disappears when you point it out to people or otherwise make them actively think about what they’re buying.

          same for the change-the-layout-of-the-store-all-the-time thing: doesn’t work on all people, doesn’t have to.

  • Ragdoll X@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    30 days ago

    I always round up the price when I see $X.99 but my grandmother always rounds it down and it pisses me off

    They’re trying to fool you! Don’t be a sheep!!!