• EmergMemeHologram@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    86
    ·
    1 year ago

    My mind is turning on the piracy front. I’ve paid for Netflix for like a decade, and it was good.

    I tried not to pirate, but there was no legal way to stream Game of Thrones, so we would do watch parties. Eventually HBO came to Canada through bell and I could watch it online.

    That moment was pretty great, I could watch all my shows, and HBO, and Netflix was putting out some strong content.

    Then everyone decided they wanted a piece of the pie. Netflix has continued increasing prices while everyone pulled their content out, Amazon turned prime video into a roulette wheel of “can I watch this or not”, and Disney+ launched and very quickly turned into only shovelling garbage quality star wars and marvel projects, and now everyone is stuffing ads into their shitty content fiefdoms.

    We’re back to where piracy is the better experience and now I can’t watch the content I want because it’s at most 2 shows a year per platform.

    • BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      50
      ·
      1 year ago

      When they remove access to content I paid for… Fuck em.

      If buyin’ ain’t owning, piracy ain’t stealin’

      • Chais@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        27
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        To be fair, streaming was never buying. It was always paying entry to a library. If stuff gets removed from the library that’s the way it is.
        That isn’t to say I don’t agree. Piracy is a service problem, as Gabe Newell so eloquently put it. Streaming started losing the moment it started splintering into cable networks.

        • mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          22
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Sony allowed you to purchase episodes and seasons of shows like Mythbusters. They specifically stated you were purchasing that content.

          Then they removed that purchased content from people’s account’s after they went separate ways with Discovery. Sony and Discovery stole from their customers

          • Chais@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yea, that’s just plain stupid of them. I don’t know how they expected that to go over.

            Oh yes, I bought that content, but sure, take it away. I totally understand that the licensing changed.

            – No one, ever

        • The_v@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          ·
          1 year ago

          Media companies, “We are losing money because people don’t want to pay.”

          Or just maybe, your product sucks and people are finding alternatives to avoid dealing with you.

          Currently pirating or streaming from a secondary site is faster, better quality, and easier to use. It’s really not that hard to figure out.

          • Chais@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Yup. You can pay Netflix for 4K, but you can only get 4K with Edge on Windows and even then only if you have the right hardware. Like, what’s the point? On Linux you can only get 1080p by spoofing your just agent. Otherwise they only give you 720p.

    • honeyontoast@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Had a very similar experience at the end of last year. Was sick of the bullshit all the providers were pulling and set up jellyfin.

      Now running that on a pi so we’ve got our own streaming platform with movies and shows that you’d either need at least three separate services for or just outright won’t find if you don’t pirate.

  • hightrix@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    59
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Say it louder with me for the people in the back.

    Piracy is not stealing.

    • Chriswild@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I wouldn’t ever buy the content so it’s not a lost sale either. All I’ve done is copy a file. gasp

      • Anticorp@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        You’re not allowed to buy the content anyways. You’re only allowed to pay for the illusion of ownership, until they decide they don’t want to host it anymore, and then you lose it. They’re such bullshit artists that they redefine common words like “buy” and “own” in their ToS.

      • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I believe their justification would be that you aquiring the media is a definite loss of sale vs you not subbing/buying the media is a potential sale in the future.

        Edit: Not my opinion. Just imagining how they would justify it before court should it come to it.

        • Chriswild@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          By that same rational: My not getting a raise is a lost sale because if I had more money I would buy more. So is corporate profit a lost sale?

  • 44razorsedge@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    ·
    1 year ago

    Just stopped in to say fuck you to the greedy motherfuckers who created a market for sharing massively overpriced content and now cry all over their piles of money cause they are BIGGER piles of money.

    Which is to say: “Fuck you”.

    • madeinthebackseat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      What about the small, local services that are just trying to pay the broadcast production bills and make a little cash to become viable businesses?

      Fuck those people too?

      Because these piracy services also affect them. These services restream the content taking away revenue from the small streaming services. In many cases we’re talking about volumes less than 100. So these restream services pop up, illegally use trademarks and copyrighted materials to advertise, and can reduce volumes enough that they are no longer viable.

      Sometimes these things affect regular people trying to make life work too. Not just billionaire assholes who legitimately deserve the criticism.

      • tocopherol@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Would you really put the blame on piracy for that when there are conglomerates manipulating the entire market? I’m not doubting they exist, but can you name a small business streaming service that would be affected by pirate services? I have never heard of such a company. I’ve seen small streaming services utilized by libraries but they are on government contracts and tax funded as far as I know.

        • madeinthebackseat@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Local motorsports in the US.

          It’s a whack-a-mole of services which restream content, but the piracy services are also subscription based.

  • octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    The solution is so easy. Make your content available at a reasonable price, make it easy to use, don’t restrict it by geography, and let people watch it on any device that can connect to your service.

    Piracy is about ease of use (it’s getting even easier), and about value. DRM has repeatedly been shown to hurt only the people who try to pay for legitimate access. Not a single time has it prevented me from getting a copy of something if I wanted to, and it’s clearly not stopping people from providing those copies or streams.

    So stop wasting bathtubs of money on stopping piracy, but maybe take a few less buckets of money from consumers in exchange for your service. As long as you price it such that the cost of being legit can’t compete with the ease of use and value from piracy, some folks aren’t going to make the choice you want them to.

    Some folks won’t be able to spend on your service anyway, because they just can’t afford it - but they still might buy other merchandise, they can still spread how great your show is to their friends who possibly will subscribe to your service, but regardless you aren’t going to get their dollars no matter what you do. So stop trying.

    • Anticorp@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      The solution is so easy. Make your content available at a reasonable price, make it easy to use, don’t restrict it by geography, and let people watch it on any device that can connect to your service.

      They had achieved this just a short time ago, and their subscriptions and profit reflected that consumers were happy with the offerings. But the studios wanted MORE, and now everything is fragmented across a dozen different services with increased subscription fees, and geo-locks so you can’t share accounts. I was paying almost $100 per month for subscriptions at one point, and then they fragmented it further and I said “fuck it, I’m out!”. I cancelled everything. They think they can endlessly exploit their consumers, and maybe there is a sub-section of them that will endure never ending fragmentation and price increases, but I’m not one of them. Bye!

    • Kbobabob@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      What’s a reasonable price to you? Can you apply this same value to everyone? Seems like just about anything is easy to access through various services except for maybe some niche stuff. I don’t think being “easy” is quite enough. People like getting stuff for free even if they can afford it.

      • octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Dunno. Less than what things cost now? I think knocking down the geographic restrictions and letting people watch it on any device or OS that can connect are likely bigger fights than pricing, if the industry actually cared to solve the problem.

        It’s not as if we don’t have examples of this. Yes, some people still pirate music. Roughly 20 years ago, almost literally everyone with the knowhow was pirating music. (And with services like kazaa, emule, etc, it took very little knowhow)

        You know what didn’t solve it? Prosecuting consumers, high prices, and DRM.

        What solved it was when Apple started selling legit music for 99 cents per track, and keeping album costs reasonable. (Much as I hate to give apple any credit.) Spotify, amazon, etc all got on board, and now almost no one pirates music. (I pre-apologize for whatever detail I misremembered there - that was a long time ago.)

        Am I saying that exact model will apply to video streaming services? No, but what’s not going to do it is prosecuting consumers, high prices, and DRM. We have decades of proof of this.

        People like getting stuff for free even if they can afford it.

        Some people will pirate no matter what. You can worry about them, or you can worry about everybody else. At some point (and I suspect we’re well past it) the return on investment has got to start looking pretty bad for all the money and technology they have tried to throw at piracy.

        • Kbobabob@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Thanks for the reply! Valid points. I was one of the ones that downloaded a ton of music before it was available at all, back in the Napster days. It’s harder for some reason with video. With the music they can just throw everyone’s stuff on there but video for some reason can only go to maybe a couple of services which really limits what some people have access to.

          I don’t worry about the ones pirating at all, lol. I’m actually looking into setting up arr apps but my setup is not conventional so it will take some fiddling.

          • octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Sorry I didn’t mean you personally. I was speaking generally to the content providers. 😁

  • EfreetSK@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    1 year ago

    Can someone list those piracy subscription services so we can avoid them as responsible citizens?

    • jballs@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      You should definitely avoid XtremeHD IPTV (http://xtremehdiptv.org/). For $15 a month, it’s way too cheap to offer all the live TV, movies, and series that it does. The article specifically mentions low pricing as a red flag, and I can definitely say that compared to what you’d normally pay for every live channel (including the premium ones and pay per view), series, and any just about any movie you can think of, this is most definitely a service that you should steer clear of.

      • Lemonparty@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Hey man I have a question for you! Is this service download only or does it offer streaming too? Seems like a traditional torrent site to me, but just wanted to ask! Limited info on the site obvi.

          • Lemonparty@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            Seems to be invite only at the moment according to their sign up page. Any way for you to send an invite?

        • Chakravanti@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Eh…I don’t know. I think there is. But IDK and it may run extra…IDK. I blatantly ignore that stuff.

          I will look into that here in a minute. I will see what I can figure out.

  • YeetPics@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I don’t use these services, but after learning a bit about them I have to say I’d rather pay an honest thief than one who lies about ownership ¯_(ツ)_/¯

    • dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      1 year ago

      No subscription fee to use Steam. Games are available to download and play offline. 3 clicks of the mouse to buy, install, and play a game. It’s so damn easy to use Steam, I don’t miss buying physical PC games and I certainly don’t miss rolling the dice on russian cracks.

  • arthurpizza@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    1 year ago

    The people who are stealing our movies and our television shows and operating piracy sites are not mom and pop operations,” says Charlie Rivkin, chief executive officer of the MPA, who adds that some of the operators also engage in drug trafficking, child pornography, prostitution and money laundering. “This is organized crime.”

    I like how they always have to fabricate a connection to organized crime. Trying to convince the reader that is not just copyright infringement.

    • littleblue✨@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      It’s projection.

      Hollywood was founded on IP theft of European filmmakers’ work and funded by various mobs, which then went on to lobby (bribe) politicians into changing certain regulations on gambling in AZ, et al, to pave the way for Vegas and the like.

      Fuck Hollywood with a rusty pineapple sideways.

      • prole@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        There’s nothing more quintessentially American than pulling the ladder up behind you.

  • Custoslibera@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    This has to be stopped. Just look at what Napster did to the music industry. That’s right, there used to be a music industry and now it’s just…gone. No more music, no more money to be made in music. Don’t let these evil streaming services do the same to poor defenceless Hollywood, bastion of women’s rights!

      • Jo Miran@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Jokes aside, I have paid for Google’s music service since it launched (RIP Play Music), but I am a millisecond away from canceling my subscription because Google does not provide me with any way to randomize playlists. I don’t mean shuffle play. That shit is broken and always has been. It would not be a big deal if I could randomize my playlists on demand, but no.

          • Menteros@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Pure randomness isn’t great for music playlists. The algo needs to account for recency so you don’t hear the same some 6 times in a row. Technically still random but no one wants that.

            • Jo Miran@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              That’s the difference between randomizing a playlist and shuffle play. If you randomize a playlist, the songs will never repeat unless you have them in the list twice. YouTube Music’s shuffle play often plays the same twenty songs over and over out of a playlist with over six hundred songs.

  • JoeKrogan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    They make hardware with defects looking at you RROD and YLOD , they expect you to rebuy everything again every time there is a new console ( Nintendo). They remove your content that you have paid for from your library (Amazon, Sony, music from games), they alter the deal after purchase by instering DRM and shitty launchers and turn off servers (Ubisoft and EA). They lock you out of accessing stuff on devices you own with DRM (eg Netflix 4k on linux ).

    Then we have regional releases, changes to privacy policies which we didn’t agree to when we signed up.

    Add to the fact we’re being fucked over at every turn. The price of everything is increasing, housing is a mess, they’re fucking up the environment while record profits have been pouring in year on year.

    They can go suck a lemon 🍋

    I will only support FOSS and those who help further that goal such as valve. Otherwise it the high seas everyday.

    🏴‍☠️✊

    • Maalus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      1 year ago

      Instead of paying for 50 streaming platforms, you pay for one that has it all. Convenient.

      • samus12345@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        1 year ago

        I didn’t know that was a thing. Good for people who want to toss a coin to your streamer, I guess.

    • Anticorp@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      1 year ago

      Lots of people are. Real Debrid is the shit! It’s about $2.80 per month for the ability to stream pretty much everything. But ads? Nah, man. There are ads on the torrent sites, but none on streaming. Pirates are pretty ad-adverse.

      • samus12345@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Huh, never heard of that, it sounds pretty cool since it covers not just streaming movies, but downloads of games as well. I can definitely see the appeal.

        • Anticorp@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Check out Stremio+Real-Debrid+Torrentio. It’s honestly better than any paid subscription you can get from the studios. Install it on something like a Chromecast 4k, or a Shield TV device, hook it up to your home entertainment system, and you’ve got yourself a bonafide real solution.

    • Overzeetop@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      [Raises hand]

      I don’t have time to fuck with managing a seedbox to make ratios and community participation bullshit (looking at you, abt). I don’t even have time to fight incompletes on a usenet block. Let me drop a Benjamin in your “donation” box every couple of years and I’ll cover part of the server as long as I can find what I need, when I want it, in the quality I’m looking for.

      I have subscriptions to a few of the big boys through legal cross-marketing deals; it’s still better to know that my shows will be waiting for me on my server if and when I ever get around to watching them.