Under the order, private businesses can choose to display signage indicating that ICE cannot enter without a warrant—thereby designating “their property as part of a city-wide network of community spaces that stand together in affirming the safety, dignity, and belonging of all of our residents,” the mayor said.

Johnson touted the order for building “a broad civic shield that limits the reach of harmful enforcement practices. It strengthens neighborhood solidarity and it reaffirms Chicago’s role as a welcoming city.”

  • Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Amazing that demanding from the agencies to adhere to the rule of law makes some people really, really itchy.

  • leadore@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    edit-2
    7 hours ago

    States need to be putting out their own narratives and setting rules, not just letting the rump regime set the narrative (“Portland is burning to the ground!”, “Chicago is a war zone, the most dangerous city in the world!” etc). They should use their own messaging. And states should band together to take a stand.

    Here’s an example of the type of propaganda and tactics that Governors, mayors, etc. should use:

    "Gangs of masked criminals are running rampant, impersonating ICE officers to commit crimes against defenseless civilians, who don’t know who to believe! [give an example or two]. This cannot stand–we must have law and order!

    Therefore I have signed an order that our City Police (our National Guard may be called to help them if necessary) will arrest anyone who cannot show that they are an ICE or law enforcement agent. To distinguish them from the criminal gangs, Agents must wear badges in plain view to identify themselves and are prohibited from wearing masks that hide their faces. They must show valid warrants and provide their badge numbers when asked.

    Anyone who cannot show they are a legal agent and acts violently toward or violates the rights of civilians may be assumed to be a criminal and be arrested. Furthermore, citizens may protect themselves or others in self-defense. If you are an ICE agent and don’t display your badge, you have only yourself to blame if anyone assumes you are one of these criminal gang members and acts accordingly.

    • Woht24@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Such naive hope.

      I agree mostly with your message, however, a city mayor cannot dictate policy and procedure to any federal entity. They would also likely be opening themselves up to all sorts of liability, i.e. lawsuits for arresting a federal agent. Worst case scenario is CPD getting into a shootout with ICE.

      Now unfortunately, before you ask and I’m sure you’ve been pondering it, I don’t have a lot of answers for you in what they should do. It’d basically be career suicide for most of these people in power and while I do agree it’s the noble thing to do, it’s also not necessarily intelligent to offer yourself up on a platter and most certainly be replaced with a pro Trump puppet once you’re removed.

      America certainly has itself in a pickle. Good luck

      • leadore@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 hours ago

        Who says who can and can’t dictate policy now? There are no longer any rules. Laws are violated continuously by the very government that is supposed to follow and enforce them. The Constitution is nothing but a piece of paper now. A right-wing authoritarian power, enthusiastically supported by at least a third of the populace, has control of all three branches of the federal government. Troops are being deployed against the residents of states and cities the regime doesn’t like. The federal funding they are owed is being withheld. There is no more “you can’t do that”, there’s only strategy and tactics on how to deal with the situation. The available options are shrinking every day.

        • Dragonstaff@leminal.space
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          3 hours ago

          Strategy and tactics tell us that your idea is not realistic. You need to understand that laws are threats of violence and the last person to speak in any situation is the person holding the biggest gun. The mayor of Chicago cannot out gun the federal government and it’s nonsense to suggest he should try.

  • Hemingways_Shotgun@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Seeing what is happening reminds me of Eisenhower seeing the concentration camps for the first time and immediately calling for the media to photograph everything and for members of congress to view the atrocities in person. He knew that there might come a day when the world wanted to pretend that it never happened and insisted that there be enough evidence that there was no way anyone could deny the holocaust.

    It was the greatest act by a president (in my opinion) before he even became the president.

    The lesson being, everyone in these cities need to be recording everything, so that when the blatantly criminal administration and its enablers are finally held to legal account (and they will), there can be no denying what they attempted to do in America in 2025.

        • DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 hours ago

          I mean, problem is, its not a wikipedia that takes only 100GB, archive.org is in the TB and PB range.

          If the funds can only sustain a max of 500 PB (for example), if you split that funding to 2 sites, you reduce it to 250 PB, if you want a EU site, a US site, and a Australia site, for example, you’re splitting the same pool of funds to just 166PB. I highly doubt people that usually donate $50 to one site is suddenly gonna find the money to donate $50 to each of the 3 sites, so the natural course of events is to split their donation to 3 sites.

          (I mean, if you wanna make a personal backup copy to “decentralize” it, you can already do it yourself, just start downloading. I’m talking about a 100% clone of every bit of data, I don’t think individuals are gonna be able to maintain 500PB all by themselves and constantly check for data corruption)

  • Deceptichum@quokk.au
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    7 hours ago

    So will Chicago PS arrest ICE agents who enter these premises? Because so far the law has not been an obstacle to Trump.

    • Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 hours ago

      See now all the dem mayors and city who increased police budgets after 2020 are going to be glad they did, the police will definitely put themselves between the communities they’re been occupying and their fellow fascists.

  • TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    89
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    12 hours ago

    Makes me think, however flawed the American democracy is, the federal set up does indeed hamper the attempts of tyrannical consolidation. Diversity is not without issues, but having enough diversity allows deviation from enforced thoughts. So diversity is indeed a strength. This is what the MAGA wants to rid.

    • IronBird@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 hours ago

      they’re still black bagging people off of streets in broad daylight, in plain clothes with zero identification, and sending them to whothefuckknows…if your federal setup cant stop that then what the fuck is it for?

  • kaidenshi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    344
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    15 hours ago

    A government that detains and assaults its own citizens without justification or warrant is no longer a legitimate government and must be dismantled and replaced with a government that serves the will of its citizens.

    • ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      53
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      14 hours ago

      The will of citizens comes second to the rights of all people. It wouldn’t matter if 90% of the country wanted this. It would still be an unconstitutional infringement of rights.

      • MonkeMischief@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        38
        ·
        13 hours ago

        100%. The whole point of the document was to put guardrails to override the “3 wolves and a sheep deciding on dinner” scenario.

      • cadekat@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        12 hours ago

        Laws/rights are just thoughts and words. If 90% of the population wants something—barring some extreme use of force—they’re going to get their way.

        Simply declaring something unconstitutional or illegal is a paper shield.

        That’s not to say that there isn’t value in codifying these things. It helps maintain long term positions/policies when the government swings across the centrepoint, but they only work because the majority of the population agrees with them.

        • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          12 hours ago

          Most specifically, it’s to provide a framework so that small changes are orderly and big changes deliberate.
          Laws provide a framework that tries to resist change to the maximum degree possible, with the benefit that it’s generally agreeable enough to enough people that it’s preferable to the danger and force involved in not having them.

    • wheezy@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      70
      ·
      edit-2
      15 hours ago

      Waiting for the first politician with power of a police department to say this. The police will likely turn on that person. But it needs to be done. States/Cities need to defend their citizens. Or at the very least show how the existing systems have failed and fallen fully to fascism.

        • wheezy@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          10 hours ago

          Link? On purpose or out of incompetence? The later is just as likely lol.

          Edit: Read that in reverse thinking the cops tear gassed ICE. I know what incident you’re referring to now.

    • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      edit-2
      12 hours ago

      replaced with a government that serves the will of its citizens.

      What are we going to do about the 20 to 40 percent of people who support ICE and other horrors?

      edit for clarity: replace “this” with concrete

      • DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        9 hours ago

        Realisticaly, unless we are doing forced deportations or removing their voting rights, they are unfortunately gonna still have a voice in the process, but its society’s job to educate the next generation to make sure they don’t become those idiots. As long as the idiot’s party never attain a majority, or try to overthrow the democratic process, its just a permanent minority that is loud as fuck, but has no teeth. There’s always gonna be those types of regressive people, even in the best fuctioning democracy.

    • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      15 hours ago

      shows up to that movement with pitchforks

      While we’re on the subject, how DID pitchforks become the universal symbol of rioting and revolt? As a weapon, I mean it’s decent I guess. You could certainly kill someone with it for sure, but it’s not some ultimate weapon. A chainsaw certainly has more raw terror inducing imagery. You see someone with a pitchfork in a 1-1 setting, and you could fight them off. You could grab the pitchfork as it’s being used against you and have a chance to fight back.

      But a chainsaw? How do you fight a guy with a chainsaw??? Or a gun???

      I guess what I’m saying is, if we happen to pass a hardware store along our march of revolution, could we pop in for a sec, so I can buy a chainsaw???

      • Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        50
        ·
        15 hours ago

        Because when the peasants would revolt, they’d grab the closest thing to a weapon they owned. This imagery predates the chainsaw…

        • SomeoneSomewhere@lemmy.nz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          31
          ·
          15 hours ago

          You also want a weapon you’re familiar with and that you can control. In medieval farming communities, chances are everyone’s used a pitchfork. Axe less so.

          Pitchforks also work better as infantry; they’re kind of a mini pike so they’re useful in a mass and against horses. Swing an axe in a mob and it’ll hit your neighbour.

          • Kirp123@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            12
            ·
            14 hours ago

            They were plenty familiar with axes too. Medieval peasants would have to chop wood pretty much daily as fuel for cooking and heating. Also most medieval pitchforks were made from wood since that would be way cheaper, while axes were metal.

            But yeah in case of revolt, unless it was a very impromptu affair, they would usually have blacksmiths which could modify their tools to make better weapons.

          • cygnus@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            14 hours ago

            It was also common to quickly forge rudimentary pollaxes (halberds, etc.) because they handled intuitively enough to people used to farm implements.

      • fartographer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        edit-2
        14 hours ago

        Chainsaws:

        • Tripping while carrying a pitchfork is less likely to result in a fatality than a chainsaw
        • Chainsaws rely on external power sources before they become heavy abrasive clubs
        • Reinforcements won’t hear you engaging your pitchfork from a block away
        • A pitchfork is lighter and longer, making it easier to wield and have a potential for higher force with lower torque
        • Chainsaws don’t like being used on fluid-filled fleshy bits, which can result in a tangled nightmare bogging down your weapon while you try using the “stuck shopping cart” maneuver on something noncompliant and screaming
        • Pitchforks can be quickly shared between targets. Chainsaws quickly share bits of targets between you and anyone nearby

        Guns:

        • Requires training
        • See issue about external power sources
        • See noise issue
        • Friendly fire

        You could grab the pitchfork as it’s being used against you and have a chance to fight back.

        Push harder

        • ❌ Pitchfork: Long, unbalanced weight, gets stuck when embedded in a solid medium
        • ✅ Softball bat: Less cumbersome, well balanced, doesn’t get stuck in squishy
        • Miracle Blade®️: Abuse as desired and Chef Tony will hand-deliver you free replacements, CHEESE CHEESE
        • Th3D3k0y@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          11 hours ago

          Spears, and (pun) by extension Pitchforks, being long is not a draw back. It is a stabbing weapon you could take out someone with a baseball bat before they even get in reach to be a risk.

          • ronl2k@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            10 hours ago

            Spears (pointy sticks) are the oldest weapon. They might have been created by non-humans. They helped us come down from the trees and vanquish large prey with teamwork.

            • Lushed_Lungfish@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              9 hours ago

              Eh, would not the club be the first weapon? Followed closely by our evolutionary omgwtfbbqhax: the accurate and powerfully thrown rock?

        • Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          12 hours ago

          Miracle Blade!! And if by some chance the rebellion is ruthlessly put down with military force, “it’s the last knife you’ll ever need!”

      • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        14 hours ago

        I’m pretty sure it’s an old trope from early horror films. The villagers would arrive with torches and pitchforks to drive out the monster. This clip from Frankenstein (1931) actually has a mob with torches and clubs, but a similar clip from Bride of Frankenstein (1935) shows a mob with seemingly all kinds of tools including pitchforks and a pickaxe. (I can’t find a full clip from Bride of Frankenstein, just this quick shot in the trailer.)

        A similar mob appears at the end of The Adventures of Hucklberry Finn (1939), coming for Jim.

        TV Tropes has a whole section on this trope.

      • TheMadCodger@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        14 hours ago

        Peasant farmers revolting against the monster being created in the nearby castle of the mad doctor 🤷🏼‍♂️

  • Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Good on yer, Mayor Johnson. I’d like Mayor Bass to do the same. And the LACC to instruct the LAPD to enforce due process.

    Well, I can dream, can’t I?

  • LoafedBurrito@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    14 hours ago

    The administration is TERRIFIED of its own citizens and they are doing anything they can do to suppress our rights and make us suffer.

    At the same time, they are crashing the economy as fast as possible so we don’t have time to fight back and protest. The struggle is their favorite part.

    • Basic Glitch@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      9 hours ago

      Yeah… sometimes I feel like growing up with an abusive vindictive parent kinda prepared me for this. I wish I had something better to tell you, but the reality is they just suck and they shouldn’t be in control. They’re abusive. They’re vindictive. I’m sorry and you deserve better, but you’re stuck with them (for now). You’re not alone though. We’re all stuck with them (for now).

      They get off on watching you struggle, but they also have fragile little egos that are easily bruised. Use that to your advantage. Take some comfort in the fact that narcissists are so blinded by their own egos, it usually means they can be outsmarted because underestimating everyone who isn’t them is their default mode. Their thinking is really rigid because they lack empathy and the ability to see things from any perspective other than their own. Often this results in them inadvertently but repeatedly shooting themselves in the foot while trying to assert their dominance. Try to laugh about it when it happens. Take care of yourself. Try to take care others. Stick together and remember you’re better than them.

  • just2look@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    61
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    15 hours ago

    This only works if they are willing to enforce it. So they would need to order and get CPD on board with arresting ICE agents. And as much as I would love to see that happen, police tend to be the biggest bootlickers of them all.

    Even the mayor stated federal agents wouldn’t be arrested for violating this. So it is just pointless and performative.

    • itsprobablyfine@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      9 hours ago

      It gives the populous more ‘room’ to intercede. Basically, a normal person at a cafe feels they have some permission structure to stand up to ice, after all, the governor and the mayor told them to. So they aren’t rebelling, they are helping uphold the law. I think things like this actually goes a long way in moving the general public. At the very least it doesn’t hurt

    • ilmagico@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      14 hours ago

      According to the mayor, while federal agents in violation of the order would not be arrested by Chicago police, the city will take the federal government to court if necessary.

      So yeah… nope, they’re not going to enforce it.

      • Default Username@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Ah, yes. The government that famously doesn’t listen to court orders will be sued. I’m sure that lawsuit will finally bring a stop to all of this lawlessness this time.

    • NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      15 hours ago

      The police are probably still pissed off they got tear gassed (that is for black people!). But the best anyone can hope for is “Yeah. This library is an ICE free zone. Two feet out the door isn’t. So just wait there with your guns”

      • just2look@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        14 hours ago

        He said they would fight it in the courts. And we have seen how much respect they have for the judiciary and legal process.

  • Carmakazi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    15 hours ago

    They’ll take it as a challenge to their authority and specifically target them, just like sanctuary cities and states. I hope those businesses have funds for renovations after a SWAT entry team has their way with them.

      • Asafum@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        15 hours ago

        “As he is now known as Lord God Emperor Donald Trump His Magnificence, any damages caused by the federal government will be considered acts of God and threefore not covered.”

        • NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          15 hours ago

          No need.

          Many (most?) policies already have an “act of government” clause that is specifically used to not pay out when police and feds destroy shit. Same with having carve outs for “military action”.

          Also, funny enough, many policies actually have specific carve outs for damage due to “civil commotion” e.g. rioting. So there actually is a kernel of truth to “don’t destroy that mom and pop shop when you are rioting” because it probably will end that company (unless that is the point but…). But still fuck your Target and Kmart.