• isekaihero@ani.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    42 minutes ago

    This is fascists using “think of the children” to violate everyone’s online privacy and spy on everyone worldwide.

  • greatwhitepapertiger@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    56 minutes ago

    This has nothing to do with porn or protecting children. It’s a backdoor way to attach names and faces to VPN usage so movie and music studios can sue specific people for torrenting. They failed in bringing lawsuits previously because they couldn’t pin point the piracy to specific individuals. I would bet money that the ministers leading this charge have ties to groups in the movie and music industry. The UK will be the testbed before the full rollout in the EU and then worldwide.

    • Jason2357@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      37 minutes ago

      This is a lot bigger than the entertainment industry now. Creeping fascism and the trillion dollar surveillance capitalism industry are hellish bed buddies.

  • UltraBlack@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    53 minutes ago

    Ok one question: Why do we have to protect children from porn if they’ve already gotten exposed to it?

    • bier@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      13 minutes ago

      So they have more time to watch people shooting each other.

    • dyc3@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      55 minutes ago

      If you want to actually play devil’s advocate, you gotta give an argument. Otherwise, you’re just being contrarian.

      • bier@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 minutes ago

        Let me give you one, kids try to explore topics out of curiosity. They are probably not going to look up someone torturing animals, because they don’t want to see that. Kids usually look up and explore things they are ready for. Also “kids” is a pretty diverse group, a 5 year old and a 15 year old kid are very different.

        For real young kids parents should monitor online behavior anyway. For teens, how is life this different than looking at a playboy or a porn tape. Teens have been doing that forever, the people creating these laws probably did that when they where kids.

        It’s probably a lot better to let kids (teens) explore nudity and sex in a safe environment, instead of letting them go unsupervised in places that ignore the law.

        It’s basically the same argument with drugs, offering legal options vs. going to a dealer and possibly getting much more dangerous drugs mixed in.

  • toad31@lemmy.cif.su
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    If I had to guess, I’d say the government pushback against porn is a result of members of the ruling class catching their offspring with porn.

    • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      6 hours ago

      If I had to guess, they don’t care at all about porn and are using this as a pretext to censor sites that talk about LGBTQIA+ people.

      And also to block access to any sex ed content that talks about how to protect yourself from predators.

      • abbiistabbii@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        53 minutes ago

        If I had to guess, they don’t care at all about porn and are using this as a pretext to censor sites that talk about LGBTQIA+ people.

        Transgender people are in the crosshairs and have been for a couple of years for now.

      • ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Actually it was pushed by some AI corp, to sell AI for verification purposes, alongside other bad faith actors.

  • wabafee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    14 hours ago

    I think the best way to solve this is to not have kids in the first place.

    • Rooty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      13 hours ago

      And deprive capital of all that cheap labor? Have you no heart sir/madam?

  • BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    72
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Dame Rachel de Souza told BBC Newsnight it was “absolutely a loophole that needs closing” and called for age verification on VPNs.

    Saw that coming. Can’t have the populace living their lives without constant, repressive government scrutiny.

  • sunbeam60@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    20 hours ago

    Do the government ministers understand that setting up your own VPN is literally a 5 minute operation.

    Hire a droplet VM, pre-installed with a server OS. Log in with provided credentials. sudo apt install docker Copy/paste a docker compose file that sets up a wg-easy container. Create a peer. Take a picture of the provided QR code. Connect to the server via a wireguard app. Done.

    Are they going to ban VMs?

    • toad31@lemmy.cif.su
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      6 hours ago

      What a VM? What’s a server OS? How do I log in? What the fuck does sudo apt mean? What is docker? Now I’m editing files? A peer? What’s wireguard?

      So many of you are disconnected from regular people because you’re chronically online.

      • Liam Mayfair@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        If kids have learned to run their own Minecraft private servers, hosting a VPN should be child’s play… Pun maybe intended.

      • WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        5 hours ago

        what’s a VPN? what’s a VPN app? how do I log in? what the fuck does a tunnel mean?

        kids somehow figured these out. they’ll be able to figure out their selfhosted VPN too. at least more of them might find an interest in tech instead of consuming on brainrot platforms.

        sunbeam didn’t describe it very clearly but it can be described in a way that its just following instructions without even having to understand it. like something like this: “register here. click this to get a free cloud server. log in to the server like this. paste this command and hit enter. install this app on your phone. tap import and scan. point your phone to the qr code on the screen.”

      • jabjoe@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Yes plan law makers needs to have a clue on what they are making laws about. Teenagers looking for porn are going to learn.

        • toad31@lemmy.cif.su
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 hours ago

          The same teenagers that don’t even use computers with physical keyboards?

          I’d wager less than 1% of the minors affected by this will learn how to proxy through a VPS.

          • Jason@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 hour ago

            So all this does is create a black market for tech. People with the knowledge of how to set up this technology will provide it as a service for those who don’t.

            It’s the same as trying to outright ban drugs. Those who can provide for those who cannot (for a fee).

          • kunaltyagi@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            4 hours ago

            I just deployed a few VM on my phone, not even a tablet. It’s not that hard nowadays with websites being designed primarily for smartphone users

    • serenissi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 hours ago

      setting up vps requires money which ideally children do not have access to (not even crypto)

    • GreenShimada@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      13 hours ago

      If someone tells them to, they might try until a few business interests remind them that these are also fundamental components of business networks. Once money tells them to stop it, they will.

      VPN companies should just hire a lobbyist for a week and this will all go away.

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Do the government ministers understand that setting up your own VPN is literally a 5 minute operation.

      Of course they don’t. Most of them type with their index fingers and don’t even understand what a VPN is.

      • GreenShimada@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        13 hours ago

        Exactly this. There’s maybe 8 politicians in the whole world that understand what a VPN is. They’re told by a lobbyist and donor that it’s a thing that is bad, now they’re out to figure out how to make it go away.

        • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 hours ago

          I’m sure the VPN industry will bring a lot of money to bear to ensure this doesn’t happen. They like the online safety act itself, because it brings them customers, but if it also causes them to face issues they’re going to be less keen on it.

    • buddascrayon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Are they going to ban VMs?

      They will keep banning things until they feel they have absolute control over the internet.

  • IsoKiero@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    48
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    24 hours ago

    If they were really after kids watching porn (or even porn in general) it would be technically somewhat simple to force ISPs to provide filters on their end as a subscription service. I’m pretty sure I’ve even heard that kind of services in the past. Make it even opt-out if you really want to.

    That way ISPs would just ban everything from pornhub and others unless you spesifically want it allowed or even provide a portal where you could block reddit, twitter, tumblr or whatever you wish on your account. That kind of technology already exists and it’s used on many corporate setups.

    There’s obviously ways around that, but there’s no technical way to block every possible way to move bits between computers. Even if they would shut down the whole internet there’s still ways to build mesh-networks or even buy USB-drives from a shady alley.

    But as we all know, it’s not about porn and not about children.

    • x00z@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      23 hours ago

      You can’t block porn completely without blocking VPNs. If you connect to a VPN that’s all they can see. They can not see what you use the VPN for.

      • jim3692@discuss.online
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        19 hours ago

        You can’t block VPNs without blocking the entire internet. You can block known VPN services, but you can’t prevent people from hosting their own.

        Some known VPN protocols could be blocked, using introspection tools. However, this would just render corporate VPNs useless. VPN traffic is just bytes, and so is WebSockets. Good luck figuring out whether my HTTPS traffic is legitimate internet traffic, or masked VPN traffic.

        • piecat@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          18 hours ago

          Good news, we closed that pesky loophole by banning encryption without backdoors.

          If they can’t decode it, you better be ready to explain exactly what those bytes were!

          • ragas@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            edit-2
            8 hours ago

            Check out my cool new protocol that looks just like I am loading a webpage about cat facts, which is actually a hidden VPN that I use to secretly look at webpages about cat facts.

            • jim3692@discuss.online
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 hours ago

              There is actually a technique called steganography, that does exactly that. It is used to hide arbitrary binary info inside images, while still fooling your eyes into thinking there is nothing sketchy there.

              • ragas@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                6 hours ago

                I know! Nothing about all this is new.

                The only new thing is that the UK government is about to learn about those things.

          • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            13 hours ago

            Even if they go that route, and frankly I think they would get lynched before we got to that point, they can’t monitor every single connection. That just way too much traffic.

            That’s why China has a firewall, because that’s the best option they can come up with because monitoring every Chinese persons data is an impossible task. Their only option would be to go North Korea route, and just close the internet but that would basically end their economy.

      • IsoKiero@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        edit-2
        21 hours ago

        VPN, Tor (and similar, like I2P), every imaginable P2P network, proxies, all non-http protocols (smtp, ftp, nntp, xmpp and other instant messengers and so on) can all transfer any kind of data, porn included. And a ton of other things. Heck, I’m quite sure there’s a minecraft mod where you can assemble JPG-images out of the blocks and view them that way. And then you can use stuff like uuencode where you can use anything that can move plain text to transfer binary data.

        There’s no way to block all of that unless you shut the whole internet down. And even then you can still trade good old playboy-magazines with your friends. VPN in itself has very little to do with the actual problem, beyond that someone apparently noticed that their current “save-the-children” iteration had pretty large holes in it.

  • Baggie@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    1 day ago

    Why are the kids technologically illiterate and undersexed until it comes to matters of government control? I’m not usually into tin foil hats, but this doesn’t feel like the kids are the primary concern here.

    • toad31@lemmy.cif.su
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Yeah, never forget how the people in power routinely gave Epstein a pass because they were participating in raping kids.

      All this “for the children” is performative bullshit to take more power away from the average person.

  • Gerudo@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    69
    ·
    1 day ago

    You ban something, and people will always find a way around it. Always.

    • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      48
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Yup, and that’s how the US got the Mafia. We banned alcohol, but people wanted to drink, so the Mafia made that happen.

      All a ban does is hurt law abiding citizens and businesses.

      • MynameisAllen@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        18 hours ago

        This is a fairly revisionist history version of the mafia, they were here for decades before prohibition. One might say that they profited greatly from prohibition, but to suggest they began with it is incredibly incorrect. I hate to be the actually guy but I find organized crime fascinating and I can’t let this one go