!lemmysilver

!lemmysilver

!lemmysilver

Haha, ty

!whitelistsilver

!lemmysilver

deleted by creator

Thank you for understanding

censored

censored

Those sentences are obviously not being excellent to other commenters here. To avoid a ban (you have broken this rule twice, I’m being lenient) please follow rule 3.

Thanks

Your comment was removed for violating rule 3.

Risky click of the day.

deleted by creator

Whoops! We’ll get those back shortly, thank you!

Not this time haha, just people mainly reporting for “breaks community rules” but the comment doesn’t

Please stop reporting comments that you don’t like, we only remove rule breaking posts/comments.

Lol whoops

@[email protected] Could you post that in the body for us?

We’re getting reports of this not being news/an article

My experience has been very different, I do have to sometimes add to what it summarized though. The Bsky account mentioned is a good example, most of the posts are very well summarized, but every now and then there will be one that isn’t as accurate.

Most of what I’m asking it are things I have a general idea of, and AI has the capability of making short explanations of complex things. So typically it’s easy to spot a hallucination, but the pieces that I don’t already know are easy to Google to verify.

Basically I can get a shorter response to get the same outcome, and validate those small pieces which saves a lot of time (I no longer have to read a 100 page white paper, instead a few paragraphs and then verify small bits)

Yes, I’m saving time. As I mentioned in my other comment:

Yeah, normally my “Make this sound better” or “summarize this for me” is a longer wall of text that I want to simplify, I was trying to keep my examples short.

And

and helps correct my shitty grammar at times.

And

Hallucinations are a thing, so validating what it spits out is definitely needed.