• iAvicenna@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    edit-2
    9 hours ago

    Oh fuck I mean I would love this to be real but this is going to be abused so much in the next couple years. Supermarket shelves and social media posts will fucking be filled with drinks and pills containing (probably nonviable forms) these bacteria by the loads. Good luck everyone.

    Also most of us already have enough microplastic embedded in our brains to last a lifetime.

      • kadu@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        7 hours ago

        I know it’s a joke, but that’s almost certainly not going to be the case. Pathogenic bacteria have fundamentally different metabolism and genes.

        What is more likely is either: ecological imbalance or the bacteria only metabolises the harmful chemicals under extreme deprivation of other carbon sources, which is never realistic, so they never do

        • iAvicenna@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Well I mean if people throw off their gut microbiome by overloading on this bacteria, it might still be harmful in that way. It does not need to be pathogenic in that sense.

      • iAvicenna@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 hours ago

        But before that they will discover some nutrients which are very beneficial for this bacteria so people will also consume that by the loads.

  • Rhaxapopouetl@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Imagine talking about a bacteria that could save lives and never naming it! For those who want to know, it’s in the nature article: E.coli and pseudomonas are the ones cited in the source document, widely spread bacteria already in your gut. Sooooo…

    • DacoTaco@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Soooo… Regular gut biome already does this? Or are they talking about the e.coli that gives you the shits and food poisoning? Cause if its the latter, yes it will clean you quickly… Together will all liquids in your digestive system

    • filcuk@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      It will quadruple revenue - deregulation and PFAS for everyone!
      Hope you can afford regular sponge bacteria cleansing baths, or you get them super-cancers real quick.

      • Evil_Shrubbery@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        14 hours ago

        Omg, ikr?

        People automatically start bitching about anything ever so slightly restricting harmful corporation’s actions even when they aren’t even involved with the profits (which also shouldn’t matter, but it’s funny that it’s not even their greed, just brainwashed by propaganda they happily repeat & would die for).

  • xep@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    61
    ·
    2 days ago

    Doesn’t really seem like they’ll get rid of what’s already in the bloodstream and no real mention of safety yet, but it looks promising.

    • Kyle@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      2 days ago

      I wonder if there are other ways pfas might be circulated out of the bloodstream and back into the digestive system to be collected by this microfauna.

      One of the ways oats and oatmeal reduce the amount of cholesterol in your body is by binding to the cholesterol in bile so it’s excreted instead of being re-absorbed. So the cholesterol could already be in the bloodstream, converted into bile, then excretes with the oats once it’s combined. This clearly has multiple essential organs helping the process, but still, a mechanism like this could still make a difference over time.

    • Hardeehar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      2 days ago

      Time to start donating blood regularly. Someone else will get plastics sure, but they’ll need the blood for more pressing reasons.

      • fucktrump@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 hours ago

        The microplastics get filtered really well in donations, so you’re definitely not doing any harm!

      • HubertManne@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        I wish I was not a needlephobe as there is some indication it can be good for you the same way things that encourage your old cells to die (senolytics) are good.

        • Hardeehar@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          Fasting is a good way to achieve that.

          But as far as donating goes, there may be a day you might be the recipient of much needed blood donations.

          Had a lady need 12 bags of blood after almost exsanguinating following a really complicated delivery (both survived). She never gave blood before due to fear of needles, but now is a regular blood donor because of the importance of it. She told me to not wait and just start giving.

          • HubertManne@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            22 hours ago

            I have a hard time believing she was a needlephobe and not more of a person who was not wild about needles as phobias do not disapear so easily.

  • MalReynolds@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    2 days ago

    Awesome, nature finds a way. Wonder how common this removal is with other things, also, engineering one for nanoplastic removal would be a huge win!

    • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 day ago

      Regular plasma donation is the most effective treatment. Blood donation works, too, but you can only donate blood every two months, versus plasma donations up to twice a week.

      • DaPorkchop_@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        Isn’t that just passing the PFAS on to whoever ends up getting injected with your donation?

        • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 day ago

          Yes and no.

          If you regularly donate, your PFAS levels will be well below average, so your blood/plasma will actually lower the recipient’s concentrations. Not quite as low as it brings down your concentrations, but still lower than average.

          Further, with plasma, they extract the proteins to produce various medications. That process leaves the PFAS with the remaining, depleted plasma, which is then discarded.

          But, even if your concentrations are significantly above average, and the recipient receives whole blood/plasma from you, they are only receiving 1 unit from you, adding to 8 or 9 units of their own. Their net blood concentration rises only 1/8th above average as your own concentration.

          The lifesaving value of your PFAS-contaminated blood is infinitely higher than the risks posed by your PFAS.

          Tl;dr: Don’t discard your blood.

    • SheeEttin@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      2 days ago

      That’s actually a valid treatment! Although really they’d probably just take a pint here and there. When you do, the body produces new, pure blood.

    • jaybone@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Then 20 years from now, we’ll all have micro sponges in our ovaries and testicles.