• Shelbyeileen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    11 hours ago

    During the huge fires in Australia in 2019/2020, the Kangaroo Island “Pelican” Assassin Spider vanished because their entire habitat burned. Only 2 have been seen since the fire… but none in the last 4 years.

    But no, no, climate change isn’t real… humans totally aren’t the problem…

    Assassin spiders have been here for 135 million years, and now they’re being annihilated in the only 3 places the entire planet they still cling to life.

    I don’t even like most spiders, but I saw scientists risking their lives to try and save insects and arachnids that only existed in those parts of Australia, because no one would try to help them, like they would a cute Joey. No one cared. I knew I needed to spread the word, so every time posts like this come up, I mention the Pelican Spider. It’s absolutely HORRIFYING to look at, but it deserves to live and be safe

  • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    14 hours ago

    Every day I worry about the Devil’s Hole Pupfish. I’d like to see them one day, but I can understand why tourists aren’t allowed anywhere near the single pool where they still live.

  • theblips@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    21 hours ago

    There’s something to be said about choosing not to care about some stuff, though. Being constantly contemplating every single crisis in the world and worrying equally about them all will be damaging to your mental health… And these days there are more pressing issues than the moths to me. It’s not that I don’t value them

    • ksh@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      14 hours ago

      Ironically being in nature has helped with many peoples’ mental health and some recognised this and started protecting local biodiversity as a response by taking action locally and giving back and being thankful. The attitude to not care is not helpful.

    • kapulsa@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      18 hours ago

      That’s why we need to change the system. By being flooded with crises, we get separated and lose sight of the bigger picture. Many of the crises ate actually caused by the same things. Capitalism, greed, “conservatives”, corruption, the ultra rich. Whatever you want to call them.

      • theblips@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        17 hours ago

        How will any system fjx this, though? There will always be disasters, hunger, war, crime…

        • emeralddawn45@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          17 hours ago

          Why would yhere always need to be hunger? Its been proven over and over that this is a solvable problem and we have more than enough resources to solve it. They even put a monetary amount on it and it could easily be solved by a single billionaire. And then we know that once people arent starving or desperate for shelter and constantly concerned about their basic needs and survival, crime goes way down. And why does there need to be war? Because the oil companies or mercenaries and military industrial complex demands it? Let them die and we could easily have a much better society that takes care of all peoples basic needs. Its really not that complicated.

  • secretlyaddictedtolinux@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    edit-2
    23 hours ago

    “Hey Bro, you’re really such a pussy, you’re going to leave this coal mine because the canary died? I’m an alpha bro, don’t be such a beta.”

    Now apply this to literally the entire fucking world. This is our current reality.

  • AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Damn, I didn’t expect to get a soundtrack accompaniment to my science meme. I really enjoyed this, thank you for sharing it with us.

  • NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    We should care about all the species on earth. We have an interconnected food chain that is currently collapsing, enough of it goes, and we won’t even be able to grow crops.

    • gnutrino@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      21 hours ago

      Nah, we’re strutting around like we’re the first mass extinction event the planet’s ever seen. The K-T asteroid didn’t worry itself with random moths, why should we?

      • Dekkia@this.doesnotcut.it
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        7 hours ago

        It’s the first mass extinction event caused by one of the affected species.

        Edit: It’s the first mass extinction event knowingly and intentionally caused by one of the affected species.

    • Dyskolos@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      Except mosquitoes please. Fuck those guys until death kills them dead.

      • FireRetardant@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Dragonflys, bats and many other animals rely on that as a food source, then other animals rely on the animals eating mosquitoes. Mosquitoes also spread disease which can act as a natural population control for some species. Everything is interconnected in ecosystems. The animals present, the temperature and chemistry of the water, the depth and nutrition of the soil, the plants that grow there. A minor change can ripple throughout the ecosystem and cause major consequences long term. Some of those changes occur naturally, but for the most part humans change ecosystems faster than they can naturally react.

        • Tar_Alcaran@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          24 hours ago

          Ehhh, I recently posted elsewhere: about 80 species of mosquito carry dangerous (for human) diseases. The other 3400 are harmless if very mildly annoying. And all of those species share a niche with their harmless genera mates.

          It’s really really hard to kill just one species though, especially if they DO share an ecological niche with the species you don’t want to kill.

          • protist@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            19 hours ago

            This is why releasing sterilized individuals into wild populations seems so promising, it’s species-specific

        • Dyskolos@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          15 hours ago

          Sure, they have their role to play in this ecosystem. But tell me why I should care for possible reactions due to their utter eradication? We will kill this planet anyway in every way, the mosquitoes aren’t gonna change anything. And me, doing whatever, won’t change our specie’s course either. Greed signed that fate a long time ago.

          That said though, my initial comment wasn’t meant dead-serious.

        • Liz@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          It’s my understanding that ecologists generally agree we could eradicate human-biting mosquitos and it wouldn’t cause any real problems. Yes, other species eat them, but they’re not a critical species in any ecosystem, apparently.

          You know how there’s those stories of scientists introducing a species into an ecosystem for one reason or another, and all sorts of unintended consequences happen? Ever notice how those stories are all from around the 1950s and earlier? It’s because we actually got pretty good at thinking through all of the possible significant impacts. We only introduce/eradicate species now when we know doing so is a good idea and have worked through the consequences. But I want to be clear that I agree with your sentiment. You shouldn’t intentionally change an ecosystem without serious planning and consideration for what will happen when you do.

        • protist@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          20 hours ago

          This isn’t really true though, especially since the mosquitoes in question aren’t even native to the Americas, and whole ecosystems evolved without them. I have also read multiple things about how mosquitoes don’t actually make up much of the diet of these animals anyway, because they are tiny and provide almost no nutrients, these animals prefer most other insects before eating a mosquito

        • Dyskolos@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          15 hours ago

          I can very much imagine that. Here they “just” are an annoyance, but not dangerous.

    • ksh@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      14 hours ago

      That will just make randoms want to own them and eliminate from the wild

  • Mycatiskai@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    Chickens, cows, pigs, and sheep would be extinct if we had no use for them.

    • Norah (pup/it/she)@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Actually not even close to true for chickens. The Red Junglefowl, the species that gave rise to the domesticated chicken, is classified as Least Concern. As is the Grey Junglefowl, the Sri Lankan Junglefowl, and the Green Junglefowl that contributed to the gene pool. If you’re talking about Gallus gallus domesticus itself, then I think that gets a fair bit murkier as they never did survive on their own in the wild. However, with a population of 26.5 Billion in 2023, I think it would take a lot for them to go extinct, and it certainly wouldn’t happen overnight. It really varies in my opinion. Obviously types* bred for meat consumption or cage eggs are going to struggle to survive on their own. But I have a Bantum hen that looks and acts like a Junglefowl, being able to clear fly over a 6ft tall person. She’s able to nest up high for the night, and is near impossible to catch. I strongly believe she’d manage to survive in the wild quite easily.

      • Mycatiskai@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        I should have been clearer. If we didn’t domesticate and have use for them then they would have been hunted to extinction long ago.

        If we stopped eating eggs and eating chicken for some reason then the domestic chicken wouldn’t be around anymore. They would kill off what is left in farms since they wouldn’t make profit off them, then they would be gone.

        • Norah (pup/it/she)@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          Again, I don’t think that’s true. Junglefowl live in incredibly dense tropical locales that would make it very difficult to hunt them.

          As well, I think the concept that we would kill all chickens off so they would therefore be extinct because we have no use for them is, well, counter to what this entire post is about and not really much of a thought experiment. You could say the same about dogs, or cats, or any other animal humans decide to decimate. Hell, even each other at times… Even with junglefowl we could burn down their habitat until there were none left.

      • MeowZedong@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        23 hours ago

        I once watched this nature documentary named “Princess Mononoke” and can confirm that wild pigs continue to live on even after physical death.

  • OpenStars@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    23 hours ago

    Can someone do this then for humanity? 😯 We may start to struggle ourselves in the coming future…