I for one have stopped posting any content to lemmy.ml communities.

  • IndustryStandard@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    53
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    18 days ago

    “We should defederate from everything which does not agree with my .world view and create a giant centralized echo chamber”!

    Why the fuck does every .world user suddenly want Lemmy to be Reddit?

    • SleafordMod@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      18 days ago

      Personally I would like to be able to talk to people with different views, in a civil manner. But Lemmy.ml doesn’t seem to want that. If you post something that they don’t like (even if it’s a very moderate view and is expressed in a completely civil way) then they ban you. They seem to really hate moderate people.

    • perestroika@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      18 days ago

      We should defederate from everything which does not agree with my .world view

      I will try to formulate this as well as I can:

      “One should not give a platform to instances which don’t give a platform to others.”

      Examples (based on hexbear):

      • in some communities you get banned for voting the wrong way --> other instances don’t practise banning for votes

      • in some communities you get banned for being “reactionary” (that is, factual - Wikipedia would get banned just as quick) --> other instances only ban bigots, not people who politely disagree with locals

      • in some communities, there is no obvious recourse to get a ban reviewed and reversed --> on other instances, there is a metacommunity about management or instructions about how to challenge a ban

      The result: certain instances are granted a platform by others, but aren’t granting a platform to “foreigners” in return. And management habits in some places are straight from North Korea.

      Defederating from an echo chamber doesn’t make your instance an echo chamber, unless you follow up by adopting the policies of the echo chamber you defederated from.

    • oatscoop@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      18 days ago

      “Different world views” isn’t a problem, the problem is users espousing repugnent “world views” and being assholes.

      Pretending like we have to put up with other users’ repulsive, insane “ideas” and bullying behavior in our spaces is laughable. Bigots, fascists, and actual tankies can fuck off.

      • aidan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        18 days ago

        You probably have some views that are repugnent to me, and vice versa. That’s freedom of speech and political pluralism.

        being assholes.

        This though, I agree just ban that user.

      • IndustryStandard@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        24
        ·
        edit-2
        18 days ago

        One of the instances believes Hamas are freedom fighters and the state of Israel has no right to exist.

        The other believes the inverse.

        Who is the fascist with repugnant world views?

        • NeilBrü@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          18
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          18 days ago

          Hamas and the Netanyahu regime are bloodthirsty authoritarian regimes who both qualify as terrorists, given their recent exploits.

          • IndustryStandard@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            28
            ·
            18 days ago

            Dodged the question about Israels right to exist. Supports the Fascist state and condemned the freedom fighter.

            There is your answer folks.

            • Womdat10@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              12
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              18 days ago

              Isreal does not have a right to exist, Israelis do, but Isreal doesn’t. It only exists because the land it was on was forcibly taken from Palestinians. Edit: spelling

              • IndustryStandard@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                18 days ago

                But Palestinians do not have the right to fight back against their occupiers, They should die quietly while everyone with the moral high-ground says what Israel doing is bad and proceeds to do nothing about it.

              • NeilBrü@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                18 days ago

                Israel, as an idea to act as a haven after the 2nd world war for European Jewry, is dumb to begin with for a plethora of reasons at the time.

                That said there’re plenty of states through history that begin under dubious pretenses. Their citizenry doesn’t deserve wanton violence nor does its necessarily deserve wholesale dissolution.

                Israel does have a right to exist. The Israelis don’t have a right to take land forcibly from people.

            • _lunar@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              18 days ago

              honestly y’all should go ahead and block every instance; we’d all be better off without you fascist bootlicking .world users

              in what universe is a settler state that’s been brutalizing and ethnic cleansing the people from whom they stole their land the “freedom fighter”

            • NeilBrü@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              18 days ago

              Israel, as an idea to act as a haven after the 2nd world war for European Jewry, is dumb to begin with for a plethora of reasons at the time.

              That said there’re plenty of states through history that begin under dubious pretenses. Their citizenry doesn’t deserve wanton violence nor does its necessarily deserve wholesale dissolution.

              Israel does have a right to exist. The Israelis don’t have a right to take land forcibly from people and murder women and children.

              • IndustryStandard@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                18 days ago

                Israel does have a right to exist. The Israelis don’t have a right to take land forcibly from people and murder women and children.

                But that is how Israel exists. How can it not have the right to do that and then have the right exist simultaneously?

                • NeilBrü@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  18 days ago

                  How can it not have the right to do that

                  Forcibly take land and murder civilians?

                  and then have the right exist simultaneously?

                  One can have a country and be fair and magnanimous with the people who were on the land before.

        • alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          18 days ago

          States don’t have rights, humans have rights, and the existence of Israel as an apartheid settler colonial project is incompatible with the human rights of the groups they are oppressing.

        • glitchdx@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          18 days ago

          I love it when obvious trolls are obvious, Once I’ve blocked enough of them whomever is left are people I can actually have a conversation with.

    • TranscendentalEmpire@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      18 days ago

      Eh… Lemmy is already a lot like reddit in the very beginning, just more extreme.

      I think a big problem with Lemmy is that even the large instances only have a few terminally online posters, so a lot of the communities get warped by those posters biases.

      Right now Hexbear is having a little internal conflict between the mods and some posters over the harassment of lgbtq and POC. The mods started out handing out temporary bans to offenders and then people started freaking out because no one was posting shit.

  • can@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    20 days ago

    As long as it’s not only lemmy.world communities you start growing. Centralization won’t lead to good outcomes anywhere.

    • cm0002@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      20 days ago

      Absolutely! Grow a community on any instance that doesn’t allow the kind of users that lemmy.ml does I say.

      I think we gave them too much power by making their communities as big as we did

        • alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          20 days ago

          don’t accidentally offend us with normal fucking words

          What were the normal words that people found so offensive?

              • NaibofTabr@infosec.pub
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                19 days ago

                If “they dont even pretend to be anarchists”, then why would the comment

                They’re not anarchists tho. Don’t associate anarchism with .ml bullshit

                be necessary in the first place?

              • NaibofTabr@infosec.pub
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                19 days ago

                Is it a fallacy? I frequently run into self-styled anarchists who describe other self-styled anarchists as “not real anarchists”.

                • rockerface 🇺🇦@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  19 days ago

                  .ml people don’t even describe themselves as anarchists, from what I’ve seen. And those that do, often hide behind that label in bad faith

          • spacedout@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            20 days ago

            Did you know that Norway, Sweden, and Denmark all have laws against hate speech, harassment, and discriminatory expressions targeting protected groups. For instance, Norwegian law prohibits public statements that threaten or insult someone, or promote hatred based on factors like ethnicity, religion, or sexual orientation. At the same time they consistently top indices like the Reporters Without Borders’ World Press Freedom index. I’m not saying that your comment is threatening or anything, but it doesn’t seem very important to me to protect the right of someone to use a crude derogatory like “tankie” (a word with parallels to terms like “pinko” and “judeo Bolshevik”).

            • snooggums@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              18 days ago

              Even the US has protected classes even if the list is woefully short.

              I doubt tankies are a protected class in nordic states since they are like nazis and other groups that fetishize violent oppression. Tankie doesn’t parallel with pinko becsuse one is about violent oppression and the other is about the left side of the political spectrum.

            • spacedout@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              20 days ago

              In reality, the pervasiveness of derogatories like that limit free speech. Of course, this goes the same for calling everyone one disagrees with a lib or fascist as well.

              • alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                7
                ·
                20 days ago

                Permitting hate speech limits free speech by making the space unsafe for marginalized voices.

                What are you saying that causes people to call you a liberal or a fascist?

                • spacedout@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  20 days ago

                  Thank you, that’s true but doesn’t catch the nuance of my argument. It doesn’t need to be hate speech to have a chilling effect on public debate. Name-calling instead of actual political discourse, for instance.

                  I’ve been called many things but liberal or fascist are seldom among them. I do observe comrades who use those terms very lightly and in uncomeradely fashion though.

          • can@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            8
            ·
            edit-2
            20 days ago

            Or more subtly:

            I can’t even say life’s a bitch over there without being filtered because of misogyny which I guess? But that’s not my intent and I don’t think the majority read it with that connotation. What if I just want to quote a Nas classic?

            It gets dumber: last I checked their word filter doesn’t pay any regard to a comment’s set language so even If I set my comment to French “retard” will be filtered on ml communities and to their users regardless of where I comment.

            Je suis en retard
            Becomes
            Je suis en removed

            Edit: actually, let’s see if this has been fixed, test French comment in reply to this:

            Edit2: lmao

            • AntiOutsideAktion@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              7
              ·
              edit-2
              19 days ago

              oh no I’m not allowed to use a slur even though I’m using it in a common phrase that originates as the slur being used as a slur

              I’m supposed to get away with doing things

                • AntiOutsideAktion@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  9
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  19 days ago

                  You said two stupid things but only one of them was fun to make a joke out of.

                  Your french shit is equally stupid. “But it’s not a slur in a language we aren’t speaking right now so I should get to say it!!!”

                  How about you just stop having a piss fit you spoiled little fuck? Not once in your ‘analysis’ are you bothering to do the literally only valuable piece of thought work: actually measuring the cost/benefit of having a strong deterrence to bigotry vs “I can think of a word that has a slur as part of it but can still be easily understood by people reading it through context clues”

                  When a piece of shit only weighs the cost of doing things to protect vulnerable minorities and not the benefit to those people, it’s pretty fucking easy to suss out their beliefs on the issue in general.

        • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          19 days ago

          I was in an argument with some .ml tankie yesterday, and they had the gall to say that “free speech that doesn’t threaten the government is tolerated everywhere,” in response to a comment saying that the CCP censors speech. They didn’t like my assertion that that statement also applies to Nineteen Eighty-Four’s Ingsoc party. It’s technically true, that free speech that doesn’t threaten the government is tolerated in Oceania. It’s just that the government considers any dissent threatening.

          • My last straw was when I made a meme on their meme instance that had no Asians, anyone related to Asia, or racism in it. And they removed the post with 500+ up votes and a healthy discussion, because my title was “Rice.”

            They literally told me rice, the word by itself, is racist. I just chose a random word for the title to fill the blank.

            • davel [he/him]@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              19 days ago

              You didn’t choose a random word. It’s obvious why you chose that specific word in reference to gaming hardware. And we know the racist roots of the term.

    • Serinus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      20 days ago

      Yeah, we’d hate to make a good alternative when everyone can just use Bluesky and Meta.

      The hate for .world simply because of size doesn’t make sense to me. It’s fine to make new (unique) communities elsewhere, but shunning the biggest successful communities on .world to try to grow empty communities on other instances is cutting off your nose to spite your face.

      If you’re constantly shunning the biggest instance simply for being big, you’ll end up killing Lemmy.

      • can@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        20 days ago

        There’s more than just being big, those things may not matter to you, or even the majority, but I’ve heard enough gripes repeated to know some people are bothered.

        The flip flopping on policies without clear transparency bothered some people but tbh I forgave that as growing pains of being in charge of a new popular platform.

        The one mentioned more often is how they’re one of the main ones to federate with Meta’s Threads. Integration isn’t really there right now anyway but every other major Lemmy instance has preemptively blocked them already:

        source

        • Serinus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          19 days ago

          I can respect the Threads thing. That’s a valid reason other than “we need to be even smaller”.

          • can@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            19 days ago

            It’s not that we need to be smaller, but we benefit if we all grow similarly, or at least the community distribution does.

      • aeshna_cyanea@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        19 days ago

        I don’t think most of the data in the network should be hosted by a single legal entity, that’s just unhealthy even if the protocol is open. It’s also my main complaint about bluesky- technically open protocol, de facto centralization.

      • UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        19 days ago

        You can see instances that haven’t been defederated. Why is it important for everyone to be on the same one? Everyone has the ability to get the same feed on All.

  • Schwim Dandy@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    18 days ago

    I don’t think the meme makes sense. The ml users don’t seem to care how much other content is out there. They still participate as much as they’d like.

  • hierophant_nihilant@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    19 days ago

    Listen. Just fuckin listen to me. The moment I joined lemmy every enthusiast was singing praise to the fediverse and how it’s easy to maintain the freedom of speach and yada yada yada. What it turned out to be is just constant quarrels between instances, defederations and crap like that while lemmy still fucking struggles to even become a mere shadow of reddit. I fucking hate reddit, I think spez should be covered in fire ants, but by god, looking at how insufferable most vocal lemmy users are, I may get back to reddit, probably as many other lemmy users already did.

    • StupidBrotherInLaw@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      19 days ago

      If it helps, most of this inter-instance drama comes from a surprisingly small group of people. I’ve blocked most of them (looks like I missed the OP here) and it’s much quieter now. Looking at my block list, they’re mostly from .world, but that could be due to the large population.

    • Encrypt-Keeper@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      19 days ago

      It is easy to maintain freedom of speech on Lemmy. The idea that your instance can defederate from instances like Lemmy.ml, but everyone on Lemmy.ml can continue to post on their own server, and federate with any other given server by default is the entire point of federation and proof of concept that the fediverse is great for free speech. You’re under the impression that all Lemmy servers are supposed to be part of one big whole, but that’s not what the fediverse is for.

      You have to understand that “free speech” is a negative freedom and it doesn’t mean everyone has to listen to you. It just means nobody can force you not to speak.

    • falcunculus@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      19 days ago

      If you’re unhappy why stay? Personally I’m happy with the Lemmyverse as it stands now — certainly happier than in the corporate lowest-common-denominator that is now Reddit.

      • lseif@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        18 days ago

        same logic as “if u hate america then leave”.

        some people want to do their part to make the site (or country) better. they cant do that by giving up and going back to reddit. lemmy is great…but it could be better.

    • Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      18 days ago

      just constant quarrels between instances, defederations and crap like that

      Sounds like you picked the wrong instance. The one I use doesn’t defederate, from anyone. So when some drama about "should we defederate from some server because they are a big corp/because they are right wing/because they are tankies/because they allow loli/whatever, I basically get to watch and laugh knowing it’s not going to effect me.

    • Iheartcheese@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      19 days ago

      The whole point of federation seems to be the ability to have villain instances that we all fight about. PVP social media

    • matmarspace@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      18 days ago

      I’m mainly on Lemmy becuase it’s open source and like the idea and I want it to flourish and therefore every defederation makes me sad :(

    • TimewornTraveler@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      18 days ago

      yep… with everything going on in life, globally and personally, I really can’t think of anything i give fewer fucks about than lemmy in-fighting

      grow the fuck up

      • Smoogs@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        18 days ago

        Can’t be any worse than the linux rabbit holes on here over just mention of anything electronic. I’m not even arguing it’s like someone obsessed with garden tools and that’s all they can talk about.

        To them: Just give it a rest for a second please and talk about literally anything else going on in your life maybe even stick to the topic once in a while.

        It’s sad when fanboys make AI generated output seem more interesting and well adjusted.

  • mlg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    18 days ago

    Another day of .world reddit migrants thinking de-federating or boycotting .ml will change literally anything.

      • aidan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        18 days ago

        It is funny being one of the few somewhat rightwing people on here and getting called a tankie

  • wpb@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    18 days ago

    Why would you want to create an echo chamber? I genuinely don’t get it, it’s the internet, if you encounter an opinion you disagree with, literally just close the tab and it’s gone

  • InFerNo@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    19 days ago

    I feel like I’m missing something important here as a simple fediverse user. I don’t really care about the politics, I just made an account during the first large Reddit exodus and choose an instance I thought would persist. I also made a second account on kbin.social, but it looks pretty dead as a project.

    I never noticed anything described in this thread, but I’m subbed to many communities across the fediverse…

  • atoro@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    19 days ago

    As a lemmy.ml account holder… I’m a bit out of the loop. I’m not tied to any single instance and can move to a new one (any recommendations?), but what does ml do that’s bad? Honest question, promise, I don’t follow this stuff very much

  • UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    19 days ago

    The beauty of the fediverse is that you can make it how you want. You can self select into a instance that best reflects your individual values. You can block what you want. You can see publicly what the instance and moderators are doing.

    Why would anyone be mad about that?

    • random@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      18 days ago

      no, I can’t handle being banned for pointing out that the uigurs exist and are being genocided by a certain dictatorship rn