• partial_accumen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    90
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    10 months ago

    This is a question of passive income vs active.

    Passive is king. You breath when you sleep. When you get too old to walk, you still breath.

    • Sabin10@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      45
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      The average human takes 20000 breaths per day. For comparison, the average American take 4700 steps a day so steps actually win since the break even point is around 4000 steps.

        • Sabin10@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          Same here. I’ll take steps and in 10 years I’ll be set up to make more than the breathers even if I become a paraplegic.

      • Donkter@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        32
        ·
        10 months ago

        For anyone curious (1000000/50)/12 is 1666.66 which is how many years you would have to live to make a million dollars.

        • TheLameSauce@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          10 months ago

          Also should be noted, if you took that 1 mil and just put it in a bunch of high-interest savings accounts, you’d be averaging a little over $3k/month just in the interest earned.

          It does make me wonder, at what point is the guaranteed $x a month a better call than one lump 1 mil?

          • KevonLooney@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            10 months ago

            You don’t need a degree in finance to do this calculation. You are simply looking for the present value of a stream of income.

            It depends on what interest rate you think is “risk free”. Right now treasuries range from 5% to 3%. Just divide the yearly dividend (12 * 50) by that interest rate. $50 per month risk-free in perpetuity is worth $12,000 to $20,000.

    • Ledivin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      When you get too old to walk, you still breath.

      But you should already be filthy rich at that point, so who cares 🤷‍♂️ the choice is largely irrelevant after a few years and, regardless of which option you choose, you should be well into the millions after a decade.

      Steps let me build up actual wealth over the course of just a year or two. Breathing keeps me comfy my whole life, but I can’t be really wasteful for a few years.

  • Bruncvik@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    10 months ago

    I have tthe benefit of a smart watch, so I know my stats quite well. Over the long term, I average 13 breaths per minute, or 18,720 breaths per day. That translates into $936 per day. When not injured, I average 22,000 steps per day, which would get me $5500 per day (currently injured, so no running, so I’m down to 12,000 steps or $3000 per day). Breathing would win only if I averaged fewer than 3744 steps per day. I think I get more just walking to my corner newsagent and back.

    • Ultraviolet@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      10 months ago

      You would also have an incentive to walk more so even if you’re normally very sedentary, you wouldn’t be after taking the deal.

      • R0cket_M00se@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        It’s unfortunate that it’s steps and not based on calories or something, I do cardio but mostly resistance training. Can’t afford to lose gains or have to increase my food intake.

        • kameecoding@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          bruh, you don’t lose gains by walking, Dr.Mike form Rennessaince Periodization literally recommends walking as one of the best forms of increasing your calories burned without excess hunger or fatigue

          • R0cket_M00se@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            increasing your calories burned without excess hunger or fatigue

            That’s my point, your goals for exercise are to burn more calories, calories that my body needs to rebuild muscle. If I do more cardio I have to eat more food to maintain my muscle mass. I’m not worried about too many I’m worried about having too few.

              • R0cket_M00se@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                10 months ago

                If the calories burned are greater than those I can consume to maintain my body weight (currently about 3000kcal/day) then yes it will make me lose weight.

                Also yes it is cardio, or it wouldn’t be good exercise. It’s not HIIT or running, but it consumes energy and calories.

                Do you fundamentally misunderstand the concept of calories in versus calories out? If my body needs more calories than I’m eating it will harvest muscle to do so. I’ve been lifting weights for over a decade and diet is just as big of a factor in gaining muscle versus lifting itself, this isn’t something new to me.

                • kameecoding@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  10 months ago

                  Also yes it is cardio, or it wouldn’t be good exercise. It’s not HIIT or running, but it consumes energy and calories.

                  Cardio is a shorthand for cardiovascular, if you do normal paced walking it doesn’t challenge your cardiovascular system therefore it’s not cardio.

                  If the calories burned are greater than those I can consume to maintain my body weight (currently about 3000kcal/day) then yes it will make me lose weight.

                  you said lose muscle, which it doesn’t do, in your scenario you are losing muscle because of insufficient calorie intake, not because of “doing cardio”, there is no extra effect from walking that would have you lose muscle other than burning some calories, which is what “losing muscle” means

                  you can just eat a handful of almonds and you will replenish all that you walked away.

  • Caboose12000@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    10 months ago

    I don’t really care what makes more money, id just take the walking one to incentivise me to walk more. id rather be healthy than slightly richer

    • nfh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      10 months ago

      You only need 4-5k steps a day for it to be more money, which is pretty doable for most people. Of course, that would make getting your 10k steps in per day worth about $300k excess, which is a pretty compelling incentive

  • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    10 months ago

    This is the absolute easiest question. If you ever get this, the answer is steps. Get your 10k steps a day, or even 20k if you’re feeling frisky. Get in shape, buy some nice walking or running shoes, and invest the massive difference between walking and what breathing would get you.

    Once you reach a good level invested, you’re functionally able to retire and never even take another step. Your investments will cover everything.

    Anyone who says breath doesn’t realize the sheer difference steps can make.

    • UraniumBlazer@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      But what if I choose breath n do cardio everyday? Wouldn’t my number of breaths increase a lot during that time while also keeping me healthy?

      • prime_number_314159@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        10 months ago

        As your cardiovascular system improves, you typically take fewer, larger breaths at rest, so improving your ability to breath reduces the number of steps you’ll typically take. On the other hand, most people become able to walk more steps after walking consistently.

        Unless you’re handicapped, bedridden, very old, or otherwise prevented by health related circumstances from doing so, you can make more with steps.

    • slaacaa@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      But if you get an unlucky leg injury, you are out of income at least temporarily. So breathing for mea, even if it’s less money

      • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        If you can’t take advantage of the huge increase in income steps have over breaths, then that’s more of a budgeting problem. It’s incredibly easy to pay off your home and have a huge chunk of emergency funds available even if you get injured if you average 5000+ dollars a day with steps.

  • Siegfried@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    According to my quick random search* a normal persons breaths 20k times a day, which equals US$ 1k

    In order to achieve that with steps, i would need 4k steps, which is practically nothing

      • Wogi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        Average breaths per minute is about 15. You’re not breathing much harder just walking than you are sitting around.

        Getting 5000 steps a day is trivial for most people who can walk. I average around 7200 and that would get me 650k per year.

  • AeonFelis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    10 months ago
    • Choose steps
    • Don’t pay taxes on them
    • Taxman wants money
    • I run away
    • Taxman chases me
    • Each step I run, I owe more money
  • catsarebadpeople@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Let’s say you walk 10,000 steps a day. That’s $2500 per day. Sounds like a lot right? How long would it take you to become a billionaire? 400,000 days or just under 1100 years. That’s for 1 billion dollars. Bezos is worth 192.4 billion… Billionaires should not exist and the world would be better off if we ate them.

  • spader312@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    10 months ago

    Considering my fitness tracker shows I took 121k steps in January, and the average breaths of 12 per minute, I’d have made 30k in January. 5k more than just breathing. Assuming a resting heart rate, breathing faster because of exercise is not a factor I can quantify

    • jdeath@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      so it’s about 20% more for walking based on those numbers.

      i would definitely take the breathing! there’s been too many times i couldn’t walk, that’s only going to increase as i age.

      imagine getting in a bad car crash the day after starting the walking deal, both legs are broken. now, you are broke two ways! it’s like adding insult to injury. that would be the worst feeling in the world.

      when it comes down to “enough money to never need to work” vs “enough money to never need to work +20%, with extra risk if you get injured” i’ll take the safe bet every time

      • spader312@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        That’s true it’ll pay you till the day you die. And any kind of exercise will increase your breath rate