• Fizz@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    6 months ago

    No way, tell me that isnt real. I remember hearing a patent about being able to deliver ads over hdmi but dont tell me it actually got implemented.

  • slumlordthanatos@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    6 months ago

    Instead of buying a TV, look for a digital signage display. It’s a TV, but with none of the “smart” crap on it.

    Alternatively, just don’t hook your device up to the internet.

    • renzev@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      This is good advice, but I really wish we lived in a world where consumers could bond together and get laws passed that make this type of crap illegal so that buying TV’s (or any type of appliance for that matter) didn’t involve having to do research on weird non-consumer hardware just to have a nice experience.

      EDIT: some morons in my replies keep on saying shit about “voting republican” and We Do In OtHeR CoUnTRiEs. I’m not american, I don’t live in america, and I cannot remember the last time I set foot in america. Shut the fuck up, nobody asked you.

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        In other words, you wish we lived in a democracy instead of a plutocracy. 'Cause that’s exactly how it’s supposed to work. This thread is squarely about the FTC failing to do its goddamn job, because this should not be legal.

      • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        They are also capable of running 24/7 without ever overheating, no matter the location. And have extra software specialized for signage.

        It isn’t just a marketing gimmick.

        • shastaxc@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          Yeah sounds perfect for my living room. I’ll definitely pay an extra $3k for those features.

          Recommending digital signage for personal TVs is still a bad recommendation.

        • wheeldawg@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 months ago

          If they were, they should be free. Yet there’s still triple and quad digit prices on these things that probably cost like 8% of that to build (because of slave labor probably), and the subsidy on top should mean they’re literally paying us monthly to have their screen.

    • Zacryon@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      I’ve read at some other post that some smart TVs won’t work at all if you don’t connect it to the internet.

      Read with caution, I haven’t verified this.

      • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        I’ve also heard people say that they’ll automatically connect to any open wifi networks. People make up a lot of stuff. Just don’t tell your display device how to send any 1s or 0s to any server outside your home, and you’ll be fine

        • owl@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 months ago

          Imagine if they came with default ads prebundled in the firmware.

  • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    Oops, stepped on another $1200 landmine did you? Should have researched where you put your foot. Everyone knows this neighborhood is littered with landmines. No, there’s nothing we can really do about it except hand out these exhaustive charts and navigation tools. Of course they need to constantly get re-updated and are themselves periodically hijacked by the pro-landmine industry to turn into a second-tier grift. But that just means you have to research who you research for your TV research.

    Don’t worry, you’ll get it eventually. God gave us two legs for a reason.

  • mlg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    Looked at the CES reveals and aside from some minor improvements, its nothing but overloaded AI crap.

    Even on TVs from 10 years ago, the first thing you had to do was turn off the stupid auto frame generation, smoothing, lighting, and other effects so you can actually enjoy your content in original detail and correct FPS.

    • Dasus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Well yeah, minor improvements really stack up.

      A friend is buying a TV or a screen for console gaming anyway and man, the TV’s are actually pretty decent for gaming nowadays. I haven’t checked out any for several years.

      I bought a UHD LED tv in like 2016 and what a POS it is compared to these modern models. I mean I haven’t had it for years gave it to my sister but still.

      I thought they looked pretty damn nifty. And AI isn’t a curse word when it comes to everything. I get being annoyed at the marketing, I am too, but, like isn’t Nvidia DLSS AI? That’s shit’s actually good.

      • autriyo@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        DLLS and similars are nice for running newer games on outdated hardware.

        Sadly it also enables studios to cheap out on optimization, you shouldn’t need upscaling for 1080p medium on a new GPU.

    • relic_@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Feel like I’m the only one that likes the soap opera effect to some extent 🙈

  • Björn Tantau@swg-empire.de
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    Not as bad as this, but when I moved to a new town I got a free big TV with my new ISP. I was going with that ISP anyways so a free 4k HDR TV on top was a nice bonus.

    I wish I had gotten some other bonus. Viewing angle is atrocious and it is impossible to get rid of the input lag (no there isn’t a gaming mode or similar) so no games with precise timing can be played.

    So now we have a big living room TV that is too good to replace with something better but bad enough to be a little bit annoying.

  • Synapse@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    My current TV has started to die. It’s developing a purple spot that starts to be very distracting. I am not excited about researching a new model that doesn’t pull out this kind a shit on me. I don’t intend to ever connect it to the Internet. My current TV is nothing more than a big display for my NVIDIA shield TV and the next one will be the same.

      • zod000@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        I got their 1080p 43" “dumb” model for $150 not too long ago. I wouldn’t choose it for my main living room TV, but it is perfectly fine for what I needed it for and they can’t retroactively make it worse like the Roku tv it replaced.

        • theangryseal@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          I think mine was around 300 and is 47”. I don’t watch a lot of tv, it’s mostly there for the kids. The 4k picture looks amazing when I do use it. I do most of my gaming on my Steam Deck and I dock that to a 720p Samsung I’ve had for 18 years now (Was very high end when I got it). It is good enough for me.

          I’m about to inherit my daughter’s gaming laptop and I’ll plug that in the bedroom and be happy with it too.

          • zod000@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            $300 isn’t too bad of a price for a 47" 4K where they aren’t getting extra money from your data and ads. I went for the 1080p model because at the distance we sit at it was impossible to tell the difference based on the 4K Roku TV is replaced.

  • Zink@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    I’ve seen LG getting trashed alongside the other offenders in the industry in smart TV discussions. I have an LG CX65 OLED from 2020, and I’ve always seen the onboard WebOS as pretty serviceable. Have they gotten a lot worse in the last few years? And/or does it vary by product price?

    There are definitely some advertising options to turn off in the menus, and with all that taken care of the only UI I use is a row of app icons that pops up. No ads anywhere, and I don’t seem to be logged into the TV with any kind of account. (Though typing this reminded me that the cheap LG LCD in my son’s room does want a login in order to update firmware)

    Note I said it was serviceable, not great. The UI could be more responsive on better hardware, but it’s also convenient for my family to just be able to use the Wiimote-like motion pointer built into the remote.

    • quixotic120@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      LG sucks in many ways. I have a cx as well. I rooted it and blocked updates and all lg services, which helps a lot

      If you update it though lg automatically and silently opts you in to data sharing without your explicit consent, which is bullshit and disgusting, but you can turn this of by unchecking a box in settings, which is easy enough. Although given how they handled it I don’t necessarily trust them to honor the opt out and thus traffic from the tv has to be to whitelisted servers (I don’t use any webos apps aside from ad free youtube app)

      That said imo compared to all the other smart tv options webos is one of the best options. Especially if it’s rooted (though rooting it is becoming much more difficult these days). Then you can install adfree youtube with sponsorblock, permanently block updates, etc.

      Android tv is absolute garbage and loaded with more ads than anything. But at least android doesn’t break when you use adblocking; my old Roku tv doesn’t allow you to set custom dns servers and when you set an ad blocking dns server at a router level the TVs apps break. Android still works although googles ad game is so strong that even blocking all their ad networks still allows some ads somehow, even deleting caches. I’m pretty sure android tv just has ads installed in it

      Of course the best thing to do is never ever ever connect your smart tv to the internet at all and buy a secondary device to utilize for watching media. I recommend ugoos devices. I use the am6b+ but they have other/newer devices that may fit your use case better. Stripped down android with 0 ads but can still run all streaming apps/dolby vision licensed and you can flash them with Coreelec so they natively boot to kodi

      • wetbeardhairs@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        can still run all streaming apps

        So can it run them at full resolution instead of the penalty-box resolution that they all force on the PC?

    • Psythik@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      144Hz TVs are a thing and common. I’m using a 65" 144Hz 4K OLED right now.

      Modern TVs are excellent gaming monitors, and they’re much cheaper than an equivalent PC monitor. Especially LG OLEDs, since they are built with gaming in mind. Input lag is a thing of the past.