Trump can have one more felony, as a treat

  • foggy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    193
    ·
    3 months ago

    I’m so glad he pissed off the army before trying to stage his second coup.

    Good luck asshat.

    • Optional@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      85
      ·
      3 months ago

      He pissed off the 60% of the army who already knew what a disgusting failure of a human he is.

    • PugJesus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      46
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      The US military is aggressively non-political. Don’t count on them to do anything as long as the civilian institutions do nothing.

      • Maggoty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        That’s not the point. The Military is no longer a tool he could use. Staying neutral unless things get really bad is a good thing. He’s already tried to use the military against protestors. (And the military told him to pound sand)

        • kobra@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          Am I crazy? I distinctly remember a military helicopter hovering quite low over protesters in a city and that very much didn’t feel like them telling trump to ‘pound sand’

          Yeah, not crazy: https://www.cnn.com/2021/05/28/politics/pentagon-national-guard-helicopter-dc-protests/index.html

          I appreciate the army’s attempts at trying to stay neutral but from my perspective they were already complicit in the trump regime and I have no faith that they would be any different if he gets another shot.

          • Maggoty@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            You’re not crazy. The thing is there’s a difference between the national guard and the regular army. The national guard is used to control protests all the time by state governors. In D.C. Trump gets to act as that governor. What Trump wanted was a regular army Infantry division with lethal weapons. The Chairman of the Joint Chiefs actually got into a shouting match with Trump over the issue.

            When he couldn’t have that toy he tried to tell the National Guard to use live ammo without actually ordering it. He told them to use “all available means” to protect federal property. The National Guard however has trained extensively against using live ammo in protests since May 4, 1970. So they used every non-lethal method they knew, including the down wash of their medevac helicopters. Which the Pentagon later said not to do again as they consider that to be against the regulations for medevac helicopters.

          • VirtualOdour@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            3 months ago

            Not American, I thought national guard and army are different because the national guard do stuff like security at disaster sites and riots which the army aren’t allowed to?

        • PugJesus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          3 months ago

          Just means they can be deployed against traitors, not that they have the authority, or consider themselves to have the authority, to make the judgement on who is and is not traitorous.

          Civilian control of the military is a good thing. But it also means that any thought of the military as a safeguard against any tyranny that worms its way in through civilian institutions is… misguided.

          • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            May seem sad, but in fact good if really works this way.

            Since I’m in Russia and here shit went wrong (EDIT: after the last time shit went right) since Yeltsin using military to “resolve” a constitutional crisis in 1993 (not really a crisis, just when the Supreme Court says both Yeltsin and his opponents in the parliament should resign and have new parliament and presidential elections, that apparently is a crisis, because he’s the president, thus the boss and should be able to make all decisions ; that unironically was the main argument in support of Yeltsin, ex-Soviet people have a very weird idea of law and order, where the boss deciding something is “dura lex sed lex”, while referring to codified laws is “legal illiteracy”).

  • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    98
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    3 months ago

    Honestly, those families of fallen soldiers can go fuck themselves. They dishonor the memory of their children that made the ultimate sacrifice for this country. They don’t get to invite Trump to wipe his ass all over the graves of soldiers. Their children deserve respect, but they deserve scorn.

    • stoly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      56
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      This was my thought as well. Can you really have loved your family member if you sell them cheaply to be used as political fodder? Is that what their memory is worth to you?

      This is the same level of disaffection that you saw from the pa firefighter widow who wouldn’t accept a phone call from Biden.

    • TallonMetroid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Oh, it’s even worse than that. My understanding is that the families that invited him are specifically families of soldiers who died during the pullout from Afghanistan. Y’know, the pullout that Trump announced out of the blue with zero prep work in the last year of his presidency and dumped on Biden’s lap. They are celebrating the man directly responsible for their kids’ deaths.

    • ceoofanarchism@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      25
      ·
      3 months ago

      Those children made " the ultimate sacrifice " to expand and maintain American imperialism and violence worldwide. Just because we hate trump there is no reason to defend the American empire and its willing enforcers.

      • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        24
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        3 months ago

        Ok, I’m not going to debate that with you. I don’t know these kids, their motivations, their missions, or how they lived and died. I’m talking about every body laid to rest in Arlington, and far too many that still lay where they fell, all of the soldiers, living and dead, are deserving of a certain modicum of reapect. They deserve to not be used as props in a campaign photo. Their families deserve to not see their tombstones used as an arm rest in a photo op.

        • raynethackery@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          3 months ago

          I would be horrified if someone asked to visit my parents’ grave for a photo op. I can barely go there without breaking down. My family’s grief is private.

        • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 months ago

          Afghanistan may be among the most humanitarian deployments the US military has done. The infant mortality rate fell significantly while the US was there, and women had the freedom to go to school and participate in the economy without violent oppression.

          Our mistake in Afghanistan was that we didn’t build a lasting change. We gave arms to the wrong people. We should’ve been training and arming the women to fight back and protect their democracy. Not men who were going to be fine either way.

          • You have no Idea how much I agree with that statement.

            I am from Switzerland, where everyone has to serve. I always thought that this was a stabilizing factor in our country, since the military power in the country is also the democratic power in the country.

            So I never understood why they wouldn’t arm the very people who are most likely to be suppressed and instead arm the people who are likely to do the suppressing.

            Women would have been inspired for the cause, they would have been willing and motivated. The men apparently weren’t.

      • Maggoty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Oh yes all those soldiers from, (checks notes), fighting the Nazis and Japanese.

        Yeah them. Horrible people, the absolute worst amiright?

        • ceoofanarchism@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          This incident was with the parents of people in section 60 specifically for people dying post 9-11 “War on terror” soldiers in other words. Stop obfuscating.

          • Maggoty@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            3 months ago

            Oh okay the ones who got rid of Saddam and helped Iraq hold free and fair elections?

            Those guys?

            • ceoofanarchism@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              3 months ago

              Oh you are an Iraq war defender I’m not going to bother getting into an argument with you it’s not worth it to argue with someone literally defending the Iraq war as bringing “Democracy” to Iraq with all the current information freely available about the true motives and the lists of war crimes.

              • Maggoty@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                3 months ago

                Hey you’re talking about the soldiers. The guys who actually went over there. If you want to talk about Bush then talk about Bush. And the “list of war crimes” is just that, a list with a fraction of the people who served in Iraq.

                And yeah I’m going to talk about bringing democracy back to Iraq. Because that’s exactly what happened. Are you going to try and tell us they weren’t the first free and fair elections since Saddam seized power?

  • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    61
    ·
    3 months ago

    Everyone posting quotes from the trump side, so here’s what the Army said:

    “This incident was unfortunate, and it is also unfortunate that the ANC employee and her professionalism has been unfairly attacked. ANC is a national shrine to the honored dead of the Armed Forces, and its dedicated staff will continue to ensure public ceremonies are conducted with the dignity and respect the nation’s fallen deserve,” the statement said.

    So the Army sided with the people at the cemetery, and tge following paragraphs indicate the Pentagon does as well.

  • iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    57
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    I’m just exhausted at this point. Nothing he does phases me anymore. Just gotta say my piece at the ballot box and hope for the best

    • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      3 months ago

      I’m actually impressed a former president currently running for reelection managed to fuck up pandering to the military so bad the Army called him out for it.

    • Soulg@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      Yeah I’m so fucking tired of watching him break federal law out in the open with zero consequences over and over and over and over

  • chickenf622@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    The army stated that they consider the matter closed according tovthe article. I doubt any legal action will come from this.

    • stoly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      That’s not the point. Lots of people now see how tone deaf the entire campaign is.

        • stoly@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          It turns out that the police will absolutely rise up but the military is all about protecting and following the chain of command. I used to think as you do but I’ve since seen so many times when they have expelled the crazies. There’s no union protecting bad soldiers from consequences.

          • atocci@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            13
            ·
            3 months ago

            I’m pretty sure they’re saying his followers are a cult, not the Army. His followers will easily take the word of him and his campaign over the Army and Arlington National Cemetery.

            • stoly@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              7
              ·
              3 months ago

              I’ve reread the comment a few times and still think that they were talking about the army. I do see what you mean though.

        • stoly@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          You say that yet everyone except the “base” is fleeing. Trump is limited to down ballot voters and whackadoos.

          • iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            3 months ago

            Look, come election day, I hope you’re right and I’m wrong. I’m just not seeing any conservatives “fleeing”.

            • stoly@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              It’s all over the news. Republicans coming out in support of Harris, etc.

  • ocassionallyaduck@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    3 months ago

    The US Army published a measured response to the implicated poor behavior of an on duty servicewoman at ANC.

    The Army would very much object to this being categorized as “against” Trump. Rather in defense of their service members and their correct actions.

    The Army is careful not to overextend itself on political rhetoric and invite too much politics directly.

    • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

      Yeah for them to say this much is a big deal considering they like to stay out of this stuff. It’s pretty much a harsh repudiation coming from them.

  • Ech@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    3 months ago

    Lol. Dude most likely to attempt a coup in the US just pissed off the armed forces. You love to see it.

    • phoneymouse@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      3 months ago

      Not only that — what is the penalty for violating Section 60?

      The army acts like the employee being assaulted was the only issue.

  • Dashi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    3 months ago

    Where can I read in full what the army said? I couldn’t find anything in their official press releases

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      You don’t need it. D.C. is an exception to Posse Comitatus. What’s likely is the Guard will be activated but not on site. So they’ll be about 30 minutes away if the police are getting overrun again. But I would be very surprised if the Metro and Capitol Police don’t do an all hands day and even more surprised if a crowd got through that. It would almost certainly require a use of force by the crowd that rises to armed insurrection anyway. At which point the NG gets the go ahead and either the 82nd or 101st (whoever has the alert brigade that month) gets a mass recall text. They probably wouldn’t deploy but those options have to start lining up early to be ready in case some large organized militia actually turns it into a fight.

      The chances of things getting that far are statistically indescribable but that’s the reaction chain.