• BatrickPateman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    167
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    First they were the second most powerful army in the world.

    Then they were the second most powerful in Ukraine.

    And now they are the second most powerful in Russia.

    I like they way this is going 🤗.

    • mommykink@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      37
      ·
      4 months ago

      And now they are the second most powerful in Russia.

      I think it’s been that way for longer than people think. Remember when Wagner just rolled through Russia without any resistance? Putin’s might has always been false promises/ blackmail, but it’s obvious now that Russia hasn’t had the means to back itself up for a while now

      • barsquid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        4 months ago

        Prigozhin should have waited to betray Russia until Ukraine was in a position like this.

        Seems like he was an idiot, though. IDK what level of delusional hubris one needs to be on to travel to Moscow after an attempt such as that.

        • illi@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          4 months ago

          With how it went down he was mainly an idiot for standing down. Idk how he imagined that ending

    • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      4 months ago

      they made a classic blunder- the one slightly more well known than getting into it with a scillian when death is on the line! Getting into a land war in Asia!

        • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          4 months ago

          Russia is. (ukraine may not be. Usually the distinction is a bit further east of Ukraine- around the ural mountains.)

          but.

          Russia definitely are asian. So. given that they picked a fight on their border… I’m gonna go ahead and say “close enough” to make fun of them.

        • andrew_bidlaw@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          4 months ago

          Most of productive thoughts throughout the pre-soviet russian history was wasted on that exact question. No joke. That long-going identity crisis even caused a divide within the elites about the choice of following either the european footsteps (westerners) or going on their own (slavic-philes).

            • andrew_bidlaw@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              4 months ago

              The correct russian names for these two groups are западники and славянофилы. I feel like googling them like this you’d encounter better results. But they are limited to one period of history while the question itself was before and after them.

      • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        In Asia? Ukraine isn’t in Asia, even western Russia isn’t considered to be in Asia…

  • Buffalox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    102
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Go Ukraine, fuck Russia.
    A not very wealthy country of about only 120 million people wanted to play superpower.
    They were offered peace, cooperation and prosperity, but instead they chose corruption and confrontation.
    Russia could very possibly have been the biggest economy in Europe by now, if they had chosen cooperation. That would have made them more powerful and influential than all the bullshit they’ve pulled to undermine the west and their neighbors.

    • alvvayson@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      45
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      I totally agree.

      After the collapse of the Soviet Union, they were handed everything they wanted on a silver plate.

      They could have been Poland on steroids.

      But they chose to reject it, so stupid.

      • Rakonat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        36
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        Russians have been brainwashed for centuries by their elites to thinking corruption is the natural order of things.

        They can’t believe that western nations can have shows of wealth and quality of life standards they do, because that means the way they and their ancestors have lived for decades isn’t how people are supposed to live.

        Their elites steal everything, ensure education standards are low as possible so their workers can just barely manage to operate in a factory, on a farm or in a mine, and then encourage them to stay drunk as possible during their waking hours.

        And then they wonder why Russians who manage to emigrate west never go home and sooner or later cut all contact with their backwards motherland.

        Frankly if it hadn’t been for the advent of Nuclear Weapons, and Soviets stealing designs for them from America, Russia never would have been a Superpower at all and probably collapse in on itself in the 60s.

    • suction@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      4 months ago

      At some point we’ll probably have to admit that they’re culturally not inclined to do good. That and the rampant alcohol abuse is holding them back.

      • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        How quickly we forget the first satellite, first man in space, first nuclear power plant, first fusion reactor, and the MIR space station.

        Something has indeed been holding them back since those things were created, and their culture hasn’t significantly changed since then.

      • Buffalox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        What’s your point? It clearly states the cold war ended with the fall of the Soviet Union in 1991.
        Most of eastern Europe chose to democratize, and they are way better off today than in 1991. But Russia chose to undermine the west and the countries around them, instead of cooperation.

        Countries are at war with each others.

        That’s not a law of nature by any means.

        • index@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          4 months ago

          But Russia chose to undermine the west and the countries around them, instead of cooperation.

          West and russia have been at war since WWII and even before read the article on cold war carefully.

          • Worstdriver@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            4 months ago

            As someone who lived during a large chunk of the Cold War, let me add some personal perspective on this. You are absolutely right in that the Soviet Union and the West were in a war from WWII on. A spy war, an economic war and several hot proxy wars.

            The US lost nearly all of those, but they did win the economic war, and in doing so broke the USSR economically and politically.

            After the USSR fell, the Cold War was over. Done. Finito. To emphasize this, capitalism came pouring into all the former SSR’s and former Soviet citizens got to taste consumerism triggering chaos that took a full generation to hammer out. And then the 2010’s came along and Russia began using it’s natural resources to become more and more integrated with Europe.

            To the point where some analysts were beginning to be worried that Russia might come to dominate the EU economically.

            In fact, if Putin had waited another 5 years Europe would likely have become so dependant on Russian natural gas that they would literally have been unable to effectively protest any move Russia made, in fear of them turning off the tap. Russia was on the road to being THE dominant power in Europe, and Putin literally threw it ALL away chasing dreams of a renewed Russian Empire.

  • slumlordthanatos@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    93
    ·
    4 months ago

    To my knowledge, it’s the first time in history that a non-nuclear power invaded and occupied territory belonging to a nuclear power.

    So, that’s even more dubious history Putin played a part in.

  • Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    58
    ·
    4 months ago

    Putin is finally making history, his legacy will now be remembered forever. What a great accomplishment! They said it would be over in 3 days, over two years later and now Ukrainian troops are in control of Russian territory.

    Amazing what Ukraine has managed to pull off here. Watching closely to see how this unfolds.

  • exanime@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    4 months ago

    Oh no, poor Putin

    But remember, when god closes a door, he certainly opens a window

    • mlg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      4 months ago

      The amount of scrubs skits involving a window makes this even funnier

  • eronth@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    4 months ago

    Wowee, all he had to do was not be a shitter and this wouldn’t have happened. Now it will be his eternal reputation in history books.

    • mechoman444@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      4 months ago

      This is all history will remember him for. A botched violent and illegal invasion of a peaceful country for absolutely no good reason whatsoever!

      • Fedizen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        that and running russia for what 30 years now with Medvedev, starting a war on an alleged false flag attack and then running some kind of invasion every handful of years like clockwork.

        What’s funny is before Alex Jones became a giant putin simp he had, possibly correctly, suggested putin blew up some russian buildings to start a war in 1999

        https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/1999_Russian_apartment_bombings

    • fuckingkangaroos@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 months ago

      Its part of it. There’s also the better negotiating position, possibility of flanking the Kremlin’s defenses, and forcing them to respond in a situation where Ukraine has the momentum and defensive stance.

  • index@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    23
    ·
    4 months ago

    So is this the game rulers are playing? Embarrass each others at the expense of millions of people?

    • Encrypt-Keeper@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      The ruler of Ukraine is playing a game called “Defend my country from foreign invaders”.

      Putin embarrassed himself by allowing it to get to this point. Russia is into year three of the war that was supposed to last a few days, over what is ostensibly his ego alone.

      • index@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        22
        ·
        4 months ago

        The ruler of Ukraine is playing a game called “Defend my country from foreign invaders”.

        You are saying it in a sarcastic way but for them it’s pretty much a game. Rulers don’t fight their wars they send peasants to die for them.

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mobilization_in_Ukraine#2024

        “As of 26 April 2024, the Polish government has offered, and the Lithuania governments is considering, repatriating Ukrainian men living in their countries to Ukraine. So that they can be drafted into the Ukrainian military”

        • Encrypt-Keeper@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          What do you mean “Sending them”? Send them where? The war is on their home soil. They don’t have to be “sent” anywhere. Even the guys who fought into Russia are doing so to get the Russians OUT of Ukraine.

          And what do you mean Zelenskyy is sending them to die for “him”. The Ukrainian soldier aren’t dying for Zelenskyy. They’re fighting and dying for their friend, family, and countrymen raped and killed by foreign invaders.

          • index@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            14
            ·
            4 months ago

            What do you mean “Sending them”? Send them where? The war is on their home soil.

            To the front that’s where they are fighting. Not sure if you have seen it but many front lines are now wastelands where nobody lives anymore. Soldiers get send there to fight over invisible lines on the map.

            They’re fighting and dying for their friend, family, and countrymen raped and killed by foreign invaders.

            A soldier and a member of the army fights for the government. Why do you think conscription is a thing?

            https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mobilization_in_Ukraine#2024

            “Zelenskyy did not support a petition to allow men between the ages of 18 and 60 to leave the country abroad.”

              • index@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                9
                ·
                4 months ago

                Do you notice that not one of your posts has ANY upvotes, and and all of them have MANY downvotes? The reason is because you’re spewing bullshit on this platform that’s not even CLOSE to being objective.

                Please highlight in my history any posts that you consider bullshit and not even close to being objective. The reason why i’m being downvoted is that many people are feed up on government propaganda so much that they downvote any comment that doesn’t align with the official narrative. For decades the government has push anti-russian propaganda and we have reach a point where any sort of criticism can comfortably be labeled as russia propaganda.

                Are you aware that USA spend way much more money than russia in propaganda?

                • Encrypt-Keeper@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  4 months ago

                  Every single post in this thread of yours is nonsense. Blatantly illogical and poorly reasoned pro-Russia propaganda. Not a single one of your arguments has any basis in reality and none of your assertions are even coherent.

            • Encrypt-Keeper@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              4 months ago

              The front where they’re fighting in on their home soil. They don’t need to be “sent there”, it’s their homeland. They’re not invisible lines in a map, it’s their land, their homes. The homes of their families, their friends, their community, their countrymen. They’re fighting for eachother. It doesn’t get any more noble than that. Nobody lives there anymore because of the foreign invaders. If they win the war, people can live there again. That’s literally what they’re fighting for, not “The government”.

              • index@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                9
                ·
                4 months ago

                The front where they’re fighting in on their home soil.

                You are commenting in a thread that is about this war moving on russian soil.

                They don’t need to be “sent there”, it’s their homeland.

                Their homeland it’s not the front. Nobody lives in the front anymore, you can take a look at the many videos of combat footage available to see the destruction that got left behind. The land and homes got wrecked by both sides.

                They’re fighting for eachother.

                By definition a soldier of the army works and fight for the government. Anyone is free to fight for the reason they want but conscripts are forced to become soldiers and fight for the government.

                • Encrypt-Keeper@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  4 months ago

                  The thread is about an operation on Russian soil, during a conflict exclusively over Ukrainian soil. One group operating just over the border in Russia in a defensive war doesn’t change the fact that the front line is in Ukraine. The objecting of the operation remains restoring the sovereignty of Ukraine.

                  Their homeland is in fact the front. Their homeland consists of the entire country of Ukraine. Even the forests and the fields. Even the ruins of their homes. Even the graves of their loved ones killed by Russian invaders. The homes may have been destroyed by Russia, but once the war is won the Ukraines can return there. That is the point.

        • Saryn@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          Either a victim of disinformation or a victim of disinformation who gets some sort of material benefit for spewing more propaganda and dogma. Either way, they should be reported for their own good and that of everyone else using the platform. We need to safeguard information integrity and prevent the victims from instigating a global conflict, potentially a nuclear one. Because that is what it ultimately comes down to. Ironically, this also means saving many russians from their regime and themselves.

    • lobotomo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Its pretty much a tale as old as time. Read the “little nicky” letters sent between rulers leading up to World War 1. Like shitposting commenters online faceless, nameless people are just cannon fodder to these people.