• daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    187
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    4 months ago

    Maybe that’s not bad for firefox.

    Maybe less money means less ridiculous side projects and just focus on delivering a good browser.

    Algo the lack of google as financial support means they’ll rely more on donations, which would mean that they really need to focus on offering a good browser.

    I’ll gladly donate to firefox if I would see they are really focusing on it.

          • Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            4 months ago

            I just signed up for monthly donations of 5 USD per month. 5.60 USD technically since I also opted to pay the transaction fees.

            Suck it.

              • Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                4 months ago

                I have nothing to prove to you. Besides, even if I did present it, you wouldn’t believe it. Even if I presented it with doxxing information you would note it for future harassment campaigns and also claim you don’t believe it.

                So… as I said previously… suck it.

                5.60 USD to mozilla every month. Not much, but if everyone did it, they would be bigger than google and tell them to eat shit livestream.

                • BlanketsWithSmallpox@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  4 months ago

                  Your dick dumbass. Not a copy of your fucking bank statement lmfao. Were my lips on my dick sucking emoji face not clear enough?

                  Ya’ll take yourselves way too seriously lol. I’m glad you contributed. I haven’t, besides hopefully spurring you on to, in which I’ll take some of the credit for it. So you’re welcome.

      • acockworkorange@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        4 months ago

        I have donated in the past while still living in a third world country. I stopped when I realized how my donation was squandered.

      • Matriks404@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        I think in the future I will try to donate like 10 dollars a month for free software that I use, including Firefox, KDE, Thunderbird, Wikipedia, Lemmy, etc.

        I think it’s very important to support open source financially, because without it we would all be fucked by huge corporations. And I might sound overly anti-capitalist, but I think that most of them should be broken up.

      • Dizzy Devil Ducky@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        If I had the money, an extra $5 or so would definitely be something I’d spend monthly on donating to Mozilla/Firefox.

      • Iceblade@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        The moment that it’s possible to donate directly towards the development of firefox, there’s roughly 10€/yr with their name on it. As it stands however, Mozilla is not funding FF at all, but rather extracting money from the project.

    • SankaraStone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      57
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Mozilla (not Google) got rid of the side projects, increased the CEO’s salary, and laid off a bunch of employees during the pandemic. It basically got rid of the innovation that could have made Firefox a faster, more secure, and pleasant experience. Rust and Rust-based Servo, as a replacement for Gecko, were two of those side projects. These are the things Mozilla needs to invest in.

      Also, I think Mozilla needs to ask the user upon install what the default search engine should be from a list of search engines including Google, Duck Duck Go, Bing, and Yahoo. Maybe the order of those could be arranged based on how much they’re able to finagle from the search engines.

      The real monopoly is their control over Chrome. That’s what they should be forced to split from the company that owns the search engine. Development and design of Chrome should not and cannot be done by the company that runs the search engine and gets its revenue from ads.

      • WldFyre@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        Google got rid of the side projects, increased the CEO’s salary, and laid off a bunch of employees during the pandemic.

        How did Google do any of that? Wasn’t that all Mozilla Corp?

      • wunami@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        Maybe the order of those could be arranged based on how much they’re able to finagle from the search engines.

        That’s the issue that caused this. Google was paying Mozilla to be the default search engine at the top of the list in Firefox and other browsers.

        • SankaraStone@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago
          1. Right now it’s already set as the default search engine and you have to work to change it to something else as I understand it. I’m proposing that no default is set and that the user is asked to select one upon first installing Firefox from an ordered list of search engines. If that’s already the case (it’s been a while since I installed Firefox from scratch), then I’d argue that’s fine. And it allows other search engines to contribute to be higher up in the rankings.

          2. I can’t think of anything that would replace the revenue that Google pays Mozilla that sustains the development salaries to hopefully keep Mozilla competitive and hopefully making it the best performing, convenient and private browser.

      • 4am@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        For userland code that basically fingerbangs every server on the web, some forced memory-safety might not be a bad idea

      • Ephera@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        4 months ago

        I really hope that’s sarcastic, because Rust is one of the most valuable additions to the whole IT field in a good while.

        Entire industries have been stuck on C/C++ for decades. Industries, which are normally extremely late to any form of modern software development, are now practically jolting to get Rust integrated into their toolchains.

        Similarly, languages without runtimes allow for building libraries that can be called from other programming languages, which so far meant C/C++. That’s a big reason why many widely used open-source projects like OpenSSL, SQLite, OpenGL etc. are written in those.
        Even if, for whatever reason, you think Rust is awful, getting a third language into the mix will allow many more people to build similar libraries, which is again really good for everyone.

    • AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Maybe less money means less ridiculous side projects

      Like Firefox?

      It really seemed like it’s been a bit of a side project those last few years…

    • Zorque@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      In reality it means they’ll have to focus more on monetization, which will create more enshittification and not less.

    • Chev@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      Maybe you have noticed it, but they try to widem their portfolio with paid services in the last couple of years. They have seen it coming.

      I pay for at least one of their new services.

    • yamanii@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      Don’t you think they dabbled on stupid projects and acquired some companies like pocket precisely because just a browser wasn’t enough to pay the bills?

    • uis@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      That’s why Mozilla Foundation shouldn’t have created Mozilla Corporation in first place.

  • datelmd5sum@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    I hope Mozilla put most of that Google money into index funds or something. At least it didn’t go into paying the developers.

  • LostWanderer@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    Oh for fun! I don’t want Mozilla to go down, Firefox is one of the few non-Chromium web browsers; I’m glad that Google is pronounced as a monopoly, as it is true. However, for every good thing, there is a terrible curse that shows how much our system needs to be changed. It will be so heartening to not have Apple using Google Search by default, as the results are fucking shit. They could survive the lack of Investor Daddy’s cash.

      • LostWanderer@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        4 months ago

        I suspect that Apple will choose to open up the choice of what search engine a user would like to use instead of Google. To avoid playing favorites or getting into an oversaturated market.

        • mecfs@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          They could piss all their competitors off by investing a bit into a FOSS add-free search engine (and hosting it) and putting that as default

          • LostWanderer@lemmynsfw.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            4 months ago

            ROFL This is Apple we’re talking about, the slowest to innovate in the tech space. That would be a Samsung maneuver, in my opinion (if that giant tech corpo would even consider a FOSS ad-free search engine). Apple is just now getting some customization options this September with an update, something Samsung and third party launchers have pretty much solved years ago.

              • LostWanderer@lemmynsfw.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                4 months ago

                I don’t know, I think they wanted that Google money so much they didn’t bother! It might have been in the cards, but perhaps Google beat them to the punch and evaporated their desire to create a search engine. Search engines are likely not a business that Apple wants to get too involved in as well, that’s something to consider. Sometimes it’s better to use what is already out there and not sink too much capital in something so uncertain. I doubt Apple would’ve seen a serious amount of success with Google being the top dog in search.

      • areyouevenreal@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        4 months ago

        Who exactly is going to pay for it’s development in their stead? Developing firefox is an enormous ongoing technical project akin to building the Linux kernel. Someone has to pay or it won’t get done to the standard it needs to be done.

        • Ajen@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          A project as big as Mozilla wouldn’t be abandoned. If Mozilla stopped development I guarantee more than one group would fork.

        • Ajen@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 months ago

          If you disagree, why not share your opinion instead of just downvoting? Why do you think Mozilla is the only organization capable of supporting Firefox?

          • baatliwala@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            There needs to be a willing organisation with large amounts of funding in the first place because a browser is a full time job.

            Also, others have already said why the spirit of RMS can’t will a browser into a usable application and I just wanted to meme.

      • LostWanderer@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        Provided that someone with enough skill takes up the mantle of maintaining a fork…I’m sure it will be fine!

        • Ajen@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          Welll yeah, obviously. I wasn’t suggesting Firefox would somehow become sentient and develop itself.

          • LostWanderer@lemmynsfw.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            ROFL I wasn’t suggesting that you were suggesting that. Like any open source project, uh, talent tends to pick up important things that get abandoned. It would be an amusing turn of events, probably in the distant future when AI becomes a thing. That a program can start its own journey of self-improvement. 😂

            • Ajen@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 months ago

              I know, I was just being hyperbolic. Not sure why my OC is so downvoted, I’m pretty sure people don’t think Mozilla is the only org capable of leading the project.

              • LostWanderer@lemmynsfw.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                4 months ago

                LOL Yeah, I get it…Thus my non-serious response. Who know why people do anything? Personally, I can’t downvote, as it seems to be disabled by my current server. There have only been a few times that I’ve seen a post or comment really need a good old downvote. There are capable orgs out there, for now, I suppose in their perspective it is only Mozilla who could handle it. However, open source code can be read and seen by anyone, so that means there are people out there familiar enough with Firefox to take it on if needs must when the devil drives.

  • FlexibleToast@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    Which would ironically give even more monopoly over how the web is viewed to Google. Chrome and Firefox are just about the only two players in that space right now.

  • cobysev@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    4 months ago

    Why does this percentage keep going up? Who keeps inflating the numbers? The first time I heard about this, it was like 64%. Then 77%. Now 81%?! Tomorrow, I’m gonna see a meme stating 97% of Mozilla’s income is from Google.

    • Jo Miran@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      The actual numbers are $510MM/y from Google out of $593MM/y total revenue. So 86% if my math is correct. It’s bonkers how dependent on a single deal they are.

  • pyre@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    it’s not like they used the money to improve the fucking browser anyway

  • notenoughbutter@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    I wonder if German govt. funds Mozilla
    something like the sovereign tech fund for gnome
    tax money should improve public infrastructure and Firefox is digitally doing that

    • uis@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 months ago

      I hope Germany will fund not Mozilla Corporation, but Mozilla Foundation

  • IndiBrony@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    4 months ago

    Others will present themselves. Mozilla have been on a downtrend for years. I’ve heard of a couple of alternatives, but I don’t have the experience with any of them. If anyone knows any good Firefox alternatives, please let us know!

    • Katana314@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      4 months ago

      This used to be the thought, but the trouble is, HTML is now such a vastly complex web of requirements, mixed with the unwritten rules set by Chrome, it’s doubtful another browser could push forward easily; especially without a major source of funding.

      • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        30
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        And also based on chrome. That’s the thing that people seem to keep ignoring. Your browser options are Firefox or something based on chrome.

          • OfficerBribe@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            It was shit. Once Edge changed to Chromium it actually became a viable option and in my opinion made Chrome irrelevant in business environment.

            Chromium browsers are good. I personally prefer Firefox, but Chromium is alright.

        • BarbecueCowboy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          No one asked for something that wasn’t Chromium based here. It’s the open source community, that’s how it works, most of us are very happy to settle for just having some different maintainers. We weren’t ignoring it, it’s just not relevant in this particular post.

          • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            4 months ago

            Well, given the people talking about it I’m not sure I’d agree that no one was asking or talking about finding something not chromium based.

            A lot of people don’t like having a monoculture, Google driving the entire cadence for new feature development for the web, or having a privacy focused browser whose process is to try to delete the tracking from a not privacy focused browser.

      • IndiBrony@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        I suppose for me personally the question will always be: how good is it with adblocks? Especially on youtube as that’s where I spend a lot of my time. SponsorBlock on Firefox has been invaluable for me, not just blocking ads, but auto-skipping the whole “like, comment subscribe” and in-video ads etc.

        • BarbecueCowboy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          It has Adblock Plus built in which is not the best, but still pretty alright. You can still install most regular chrome extensions though and should be able to get mostly the same experience you have now.

        • Zeta616@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          Built in ad block is decent, you can add extra filter lists the same way you can with ublock origin

          That said, just install ublock origin and sponsorblock as an extension from the chrome store