• paddirn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    185
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    “sharpen our focus and improve the way we work together to bring more agility to our organization.”

    Ahh yes, watching co-workers get laid off does wonders for improving the way you work together with the people still there.

  • dinckel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    80
    ·
    11 months ago

    It’s not like the management has let people, who still work there, add or fix anything. It’s been nothing but Nitro promos, and animated profiles. Huge shame that people got laid off like this

  • inb4_FoundTheVegan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    80
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    To be clear, I’m not defeneding this pratice but explaining it. This cycle is how large businesses operate to foster growth over time.

    • Lay off people to tell stock holders they are becoming more efficient.
    • wait
    • Hiring spree, announce new features, new directions, hype hype hype
    • wait
    • Lay offs! Trimming overhead! Streamlining! Much efficency! Good business!
    • wait
    • Hyyyyyyype! Discord announces a plan to replace iMessage, Email and the entire concept of texting! Triples their staff! Such hype!

    Rinse, repeat

    It’s horrific for the employees and a scathing indictment as capitalism as a whole. But, this is how large businesses work, not nessecarily a massive corporate slip up.

    Here is a lawyer explaining the “dance steps” that the game industries is doing as of late.

  • Zoidberg@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    58
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Unity, Google, Discord. All within a day or two of each other.

    For every number of employees laid off, a VP level employee must be fired. Those employees didn’t hire themselves. Someone came up with the idea.

    If companies don’t do this they’re not attacking the root of the problem.

    • interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      11 months ago

      They coordinate to create a glut and push all their wages down. Computer touching wagies and so socially stunted they’ll never form effective union. If they did, they would jusy defect out of greed.

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        Computer touching wagies and so socially stunted they’ll never form effective union.

        The industry is so niche, the technology is so heavily customized, and the people so idiosyncratic that I think forming a union shouldn’t be that hard. The real dampener is that the pay for these jobs is always far above the median. Five years of experience and you’re reaching towards six figures. Ten years and you’re well over the line. And in Silicon Valley, the sky is the limit. A master’s or phd in your field means you’re looking at $200k, $300k, $400k…

        If there’s a big drop in wages (and considering the real estate prices in the neighborhoods where these businesses exist) something’s got to give. Maybe you get unions. Maybe you just get a bunch of businesses collapsing on themselves Twitter-style and forcing people back into the “indie company-in-my-garage” model. Maybe everyone becomes contractors.

        But this isn’t sustainable in any serious sense.

        • interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          11 months ago

          and considering the real estate prices in the neighborhoods where these businesses exist) something’s got to give. M

          I work in aerospace, we got unions back in the 70s and never let them go. For what the job actually is, it pays pretty good.

          • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            Aerospace pay is good, but it used to be a whole lot better. The salaries definitely haven’t kept up with executive pay, even if they’re multiples of the regional average. I’ve got a friend who went into aerospace and bemoans how he’s living solidly middle class in a field that used to put you squarely into the top 5% income bracket. Funny to see someone complain about earning a quarter million a year, but when buying a starter home costs twice that…

    • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      For every number of employees laid off, a VP level employee must be fired.

      You’re expecting Morlocks to feast on each other, instead of feasting on the Eloi.

    • ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      Bold of you to think that the VP level employees don’t get big raises in exchange for laying empoyees off.

      • Copernican@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        I think it’s an unfair and naive assumption to think VPs all keep their jobs. I’ve seen some pretty nasty game of thrones plays by executive leadership during layoffs due to consolidation of teams and remits. Someone might get a bonus that doesn’t deserve it, but someone is going to get let go at a high level (albeit with a generous severance not offered to the rest of the employees).

        Also, when new senior leadership comes in, it’s not uncommon for them to let heads roll at the leadership level to fill out the team with folks they know or trust. I’m not shedding a tear about where those folks will go on to find similar employment, but I think there’s a misconception about how safe those positions actually are.

        • ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          I guess I’m jaded because I’ve seen far too many times where it’s the worker bees, the people who actually put the work in and get things done, getting the sharp end of the stick. I would be surprised if the 17% of employees Discord laid off actually included VPs.

          • Copernican@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            11 months ago

            I hear you. You are going to see a lot more worker bees than VPs laid off in part because there’s a lot more worker bees than VPs.

            per https://www.sfgate.com/tech/article/discord-layoffs-citron-overhiring-gaming-18603308.php

            The notice, required when companies perform mass layoffs, said the employees would officially leave Discord on Feb. 2. Dozens of engineers are among the casualties, as are several trust and safety employees, product managers and data scientists, according to the notice.

            Depending on how the structure is laid out and what product areas were cut, I’m guessing up to the director level would be impacted.

  • Optional@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Tech CEOs: we need better numbers. Fire a bunch of people! Ahh there we go. Now we’re flush with cash. Well, my work here is done.

  • Potfarmer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Discord went the way of Skype, it’s just a bloated fustercluck now. I don’t use it often, just once a month or so to keep up with a group of old friends, and every time I fire it up it has a new update bringing features I don’t give a rats ass about.

      • AlecSadler@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Absolutely. For some crazy-ass reason my job transitioned away from Teams (I get it) and Slack and to Discord.

        Discord is garbage for this type of work environment. Maybe it works for some? But it just doesn’t make sense.

        • mint_tamas@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          11 months ago

          My company has been using Discord for work and at first I was excited to try it (coming from Slack companies), but I had to realize that it’s very unfit for work. The only thing that’s better is the visibility of threads. We are moving to Slack now, thankfully.

        • ???@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          I used Discord for work and it was great for voice channels. We used slack for channels where we needed to share text and images, worked quite well. Main problem was that many people at the company were not really from the internet in the sense that they had no Discord etiquette whatsoever.

      • platypus_plumba@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        11 months ago

        My stress levels skyrocket whenever I’m using Discord. The quality of the voice is nice but having to constantly reconfigure the settings to make it work fine and the unintuitive UI stresses me out.

        • Urist@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          I have basically disabled all input settings in the app and configure the input before it reaches Discord for consistency. Still it sometimes messes up things amazingly.

          • webhead@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            11 months ago

            Yeah I use the Steelseries sonar stuff because that makes it so that inputs never change. When my headset turns off it redirects the output to my speakers and when I turn the headset back on, it goes back to it. Virtual audio devices are very nice in general lol.

  • NotJustForMe@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Still holding out for them to have a $10 a year tier with no added features. The $36 bucks a year entry fee is just too much.

    Can someone here explain to me why so many free services directly jump to $3, $5 or $9.99 bucks a month? Why not $10 per year? Surely that’s better than nothing?

    Just call it supporter tier and that’s it. I don’t want any icons or upload limits either. I just want to not feel like a leech. ;)

  • DoomBot5@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    11 months ago

    Small company: yeah, we hired too many people, need to let go of 170.

    People: such huge cuts, not touching them anymore

    Large company: we’re laying off the entire staff of pre-Elon Twitter worth of employees in this one department because they didn’t make us enough money.

    People: good, your product sucked anyways

    • Chobbes@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      11 months ago

      I mean, I wouldn’t exactly call a company with 1000 employees “small”. It’s not the behemoth that something like Google is, but like… that’s a good chunk of people.

  • Copernican@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    In this thread: Fuck Discord! Fuck capitalism! No company should lay off 170 people.

    In other thread: Fuck Boeing! Fuck capitalism! The company should die along with all 150,000 jobs occupied by their employees.