23andMe just sent out an email trying to trick customers into accepting a TOS change that will prevent you from suing them after they literally lost your genome ro thieves.

Do what it says in the email and email [email protected] that you do not agree with the new terms of service and opt out of arbitration.

If you have an account with them, do this right now.

Here’s an email template for what to write: https://www.patreon.com/posts/94164861

  • tty5@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    159
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I don’t see how an email that has no proof of delivery (could have ended in spam for example) would be legally binding.

    Accepting a ToS update simply by virtue of no action is also questionable unless provisions permitting that were in the ToS you’ve accepted and even then it would not work in the European Union, because that’s listed in the forbidden clauses registry.

    • FurtiveFugitive@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      71
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I thought the same thing when my Disney+ rate went up a couple months ago and I couldn’t find the email warning about it in my inbox or spam folders.

      Why do we let these companies get away with everything? If the rates are going up, show me in the app/ui. Make it opt in. Disable my ability to watch anything until I approve the increase in spend. It should be illegal to just change the terms of a contract and say “I sent you an email.”

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      37
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Accepting a ToS update simply by virtue of no action is also questionable

      Even it being “questionable” is a fucking outrage – it should be so blatantly, obviously, disallowed that a lawyer should lose their license just for proposing it!

      The entire concept is a goddamn farce.

    • PersnickityPenguin@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      It’s not, and TOS are not legally binding either

      By viewing this post, you agree to gift 50% of all after tax future earnings to PersnickityPenguin. Additionally, your entire Steam Library of games is hereby under sole ownership of PersnickityPenguin. All games and/or steam account login and password must be provided to PersnickityPenguin.

      Failure to transfer all financial and virtual property within (30) days is considered a breach of contract. Each incident of a breach of contract will result in a $500,000 penalty per incident. Viewer agrees to these terms of service. Any dispute or breach of contract will result in additional legal fees to be paid by the viewer entering into this contract pursuant to paragraph (A).

    • Kbobabob@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      44
      ·
      1 year ago

      Why would you need proof of delivery? The original email gives instructions. You follow those instructions and can prove you did so with date and timestamps. I don’t see the issue.

      • NAK@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        54
        ·
        1 year ago

        https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non-repudiation

        Legally you have to be able to prove someone received a thing. It’s why you get served when you’re sued. An agent physically hands you the complaint (or whatever they’re called). If the papers were put in the mail the person being sued could say they never received them.

        • DeadlineX@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Couldn’t the same be said about the TOS updates though? Would they not need to prove it was delivered?

          • NAK@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            That’s the whole point. They can force you to agree to updated TOS before they allow you to access their app.

        • Kbobabob@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Can’t you trace an email and prove it was delivered? Even mail you sign for only proves you received it, not that you opened it.

          • NAK@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            No. You can confirm the server received it. That’s different from a user opening it and reading it

  • Thteven@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    58
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    If anyone wants my genetic information just come to my door and I’ll supply it to you directly 😏

  • chemical_cutthroat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    1 year ago

    I feel like the TOS you are subject to is the one you signed when you first used the service. Unless you have been constantly using their service, I can’t see how a new TOS would affect you. I could be WAAY off here because IANAL, but a company can’t just retroactively change the TOS for customers without some kind of action taken by the customers under the new TOS.

    • brygphilomena@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      Even that’s rather iffy too. If it’s been made so long that a reasonable person cannot be expected to read or understand it, it likely won’t hold up.

      Of the courts decide to say, fuck it then it won’t hold up.

      If this goes to a class action suit, I expect the judge to not let this change of TOS affect who is covered under the class action suit.

      This is just a way to make the customer THINK they can’t sue.

  • Artyom@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    I had them destroy my sample and delete my data the week they went public, so I’m glad we’ve finally reached the “I told you so” phase of this.

  • jordanlund@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    1 year ago

    Nobody’s genome was lost. What happened was, users with weak passwords had their accounts compromised, something like less than 2,000 of them, and from those accounts, bad actors were able to access and download family tree data for something like 6.5 million accounts.

    I don’t really see how the data lost is actionable in any way except for the spoofed “Hey gramma! It’s me! I’m in jail and I need bail money!” phone calls.

    • dQw4w9WgXcQ@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      One of the typical arguments is selling ancestry history to insurance companies, effectively handing them health data which could lead to up-pricing or rejections for customers with bad health history.

          • mightyfoolish@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I guess what I meant:

            1. What exactly are “Zionist war participants?”
            2. Who is trying to profile these people?
            3. How does this establish “racial segregation?”

            I’m not trying to be annoying. I genuinely believe you are trying to say something important but I just don’t understand what you mean.

  • SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    The real question is why would you put your genome into the hands of a company without a compelling reason beyond “This sounds cool”

    • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Piracy is theft in the eyes of the law. So because the hackers copied it, your data was lost and you should be compensated for the loss.

  • nymwit@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Did they lose anyone’s genome? That’s not what’s been reported. They certainly lost customer information and this is definitely a super shitty move to trick you into waiving some rights, but I’ve seen no reporting that says they lost full DNA information.

    • frogfruit@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      They have disabled the download data button and refuse to provide customers with a copy of their own data. I have been trying to get a copy of my data for over a month and they just tell me they’ll consider re-enabling the button in the future.

    • ghostdoggtv@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I would bet money (not much, relax) that they got their shit hacked and locked down by ransomware at least, if not also extracted for sale by the same black hat.

      • Takumidesh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        I was under the impression that it was compromised logins of users that were used to get into accounts, afaik they weren’t actually hacked.

  • em2@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Wow, that’s dirty. The email you need to opt out at is different from what they link. If you don’t respond, you automatically agree to their new TOS which bars you from taking class action against them. Shady af.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yes. My mother had a teacher named Mrs. Fuchs. And she told me, “you can guess what we all called her.” And that was in the 1950s!

  • magnolia_mayhem@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    If you were dumb enough to pay someone to take your genome for profit, a second grift is just icing on the cake.