lemmy.yachts
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • Create Community
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
umami_wasabi@lemmy.ml to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 years ago

Google admits Spotify pays no Play Store fees because of a secret deal | TechCrunch

techcrunch.com

external-link
message-square
58
fedilink
648
external-link

Google admits Spotify pays no Play Store fees because of a secret deal | TechCrunch

techcrunch.com

umami_wasabi@lemmy.ml to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 years ago
message-square
58
fedilink
Google during a testimony in the Epic vs Google trial said that a deal with Spotify allows the audio company to completely bypass Play Store fees.
alert-triangle
You must log in or # to comment.
  • Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    118
    ·
    2 years ago

    I’m not a big fan of the high fees, but I’m even less of a fan of big developers being treated differently than the little guy.

    • Einar@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      2 years ago

      Some banks do this *** too. The more money you deposit, the less fees you pay. Because ‘premium customer’ and all this.

      • 7u5k3n@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 years ago

        If you owe the bank $100 that’s your problem. If you owe the bank $100 million, that’s the bank’s problem

      • Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 years ago

        Agreed, but at least that is an upfront rule that technically applies to anyone with X amount of money. This is some back room handshake shit.

        I’d be better if Apple / Google lowered their fees based upon how many installs anyone hit. At least it would apply to everyone, not just a couple of billionaires scratching each other’s backs.

    • ButtDrugs@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 years ago

      I’m gonna go out on a limb and say I think this is done to prevent anticompetitive issues. If Google were to profit off of both its own product (youtube / yt music) and also require its competitors to pay it a % of revenue, it would potentially open them up to more anticompetitive lawsuits.

      • essteeyou@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 years ago

        They don’t do the same for ebooks with Kindle, which is why Amazon has removed the ability to buy them from the app. I’d be surprised if that was the reason for Spotify.

        • buzziebee@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          That got turned back on for me? Did they change it only for a few markets?

  • tinsukE@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    67
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    No fees when users choose to pay via Spotify (which had been the case and only option since the beginning, until User Choice Billing was implemented).

    If users choose to pay with Google Play Billing, Google keeps 4%.

    Even so, what I find hypocritical is that Spotify got this deal and seemingly agreed to keep it under wraps, without advocating for it to be extended to all other music streaming services in the platform.

    Because… having a deal with the platform holder that gives it unfair advantage over the competition is exactly what they accuse Apple of doing with iOS.

    Sauce: https://www.theverge.com/2023/11/20/23969690/google-spotify-android-billing-commission-secret-deal

    • abhibeckert@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      4% is basically just the payment processing fee (averaged out, since it’s slightly different for every transaction). Spotify has to pay that regardless of how you pay.

    • TheOakTree@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      Didn’t Spotify join Epic’s side in the Epic v Apple lawsuit over the app store?

    • ubermeisters@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      deleted by creator

  • Clav64@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    2 years ago

    The game is rigged

  • DrSleepless@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    We’re totally screwing the artist, so we’ll give you a cut if we don’t pay any gees.

  • RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    2 years ago

    Kind of weird, considering they’re a major competitor, but so what? Why is this something they need to “admit”?

    • Throwaway4669332255@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      2 years ago

      Stuff like this will be used in the anti monopoly cases going on world wide.

      • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        14
        ·
        2 years ago

        I’m all for reigning in monopolies, but I actually don’t see how this is anticompetitive.

        • nixcamic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          19
          ·
          2 years ago

          If you want to start a competitor to Spotify or Google music, you will have to pay those fees making it almost impossible for you to compete.

          • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            A company giving special access to it’s competition on a platform they control is usually used as an indicator of not being anticompetitive.

            I hadn’t considered it from a “collusion” angle.

            • Herbal Gamer@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              2 years ago

              it would be different if it was for all it’s competition.

              • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 years ago

                Eh, when Microsoft was required to ask you which browser you wanted, they didn’t need to offer every browser, just theirs, firefox and Chrome.

                This could definitely be collusion, but I don’t think that not extending it to all competitiors is what makes it that.

                • Herbal Gamer@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 years ago

                  Microsoft didn’t make the other browsers pay for the privilege of being a browser though.

        • thenightisdark@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          How? Special back door secret deals for one and only one company is the definition of anticompetitive.

          Competition is defined as more than one lol

          Edit: I’m special, I am first place! But if you knew it was 1st place of one… I sure hope you think me as noncompetitive…🤣 It’s strange to me to think I’m competitive if I have no competitors.

    • sebinspace@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      2 years ago

      Netflix makes heavy use of Amazon Web Services, specifically S3 Buckets. I’m sure there’s a special deal worked out with them as an anchor client.

      Malls do the same thing. While they’re not in direct competition in the same sense as Google/Spotify or Amazon/Netflix, some stores don’t even pay rent in a mall because it’s expected that they’ll drive traffic to the rest of the stores. 90% sure Victoria’s Secret, Macy’s, etc are some of these anchor stores that very often pay little or negative rent due to the sheer revenue generated by other avenues.

  • thepiguy@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    2 years ago

    Yea no shit, idk if it’s just for my region or what, but Spotify does not manage their subscription through the play store. Makes it more annoying to cancel it too, which the execs at Spotify probably see as a plus.

  • PixelatedCleric@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    2 years ago

    What alternatives do you guys use besides Bandcamp? I am open to paying a sub as long as the artist is getting a decent cut.

    • down daemon@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Pirate and buy official merch, they make more of that anyway. Also live shows

      • balp@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 years ago

        LiveNation has fixed the issue that artists got paid for playing live, not the companies can take that cut as well.

        • devils_advocate@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 years ago

          Are you sure “fixed” is the correct word?

          https://www.economicliberties.us/press-release/live-nation-ticketmasters-promises-are-no-substitute-for-break-up/

    • BigBananaDealer@lemm.ee
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      buy the cd and rip them into your phone

      • ubermeisters@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        15
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        deleted by creator

        • AnEmotionalCabbage@lemmynsfw.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          2 years ago

          It’s pretty much one of the only ways to make sure the artist gets a half decent cut though.

          Unless you want to use bandcamp, which is much easier.

          • ubermeisters@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            deleted by creator

            • Final Remix@lemmy.world
              cake
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              2 years ago

              Bought out by EPIC, sadly… we’ll see where things go…

              • Emerald@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                edit-2
                2 years ago

                Not anymore, EPIC sold it to Songtradr

                https://blog.bandcamp.com/2023/11/22/songtradr-acquires-bandcamp/

                https://www.songtradr.com/blog/posts/songtradr-bandcamp-acquisition

                • Final Remix@lemmy.world
                  cake
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  2 years ago

                  I hate epic, but I also can’t tell if this is good or bad… my statement stands: we’ll see.

              • ubermeisters@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                2 years ago

                deleted by creator

            • silly goose meekah@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              2 years ago

              Uh oh

              Well I guess at least for dubstep there’s 140plates.com

              Edit: nevermind… Damn it

              • ubermeisters@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                2 years ago

                deleted by creator

        • BigBananaDealer@lemm.ee
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 years ago

          the first CD i ripped was like 2 years ago

        • umami_wasabi@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          Not ideal but artists get paid proper. Just don’t share then you’re mostly fine.

          P.S.: Subject to your local law which may prohibits ripping a CD. This is NOT a legal advise.

          Edit: I don’t know if my statement is right or not given the downvotes. Can someone explain?

    • ExcessiveAardvark@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      7digital has a reasonable selection, but it’s not all available lossless, which would be almost incomprehensible in 2023 if it wasn’t for the fact that we’re talking about the music industry.

      • Emerald@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        Im not really sure what cut 7digital gives to artists either

    • DavidGA@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Apple Music pays more than Spotify. It’s probably still not “decent”, but it’s more.

  • andrew_bidlaw@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Idk if Bandcamp is better, but there I buy my beloved albums with a big tip. The only thing I dislike is many artists default to PayPal for their merch. Ah, and they got owned by someone like Tencent or Epic?

    • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      2 years ago

      Were owned by Epic then sold to Songtradr last month

      • andrew_bidlaw@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 years ago

        Thanks. Did you hear how it affects users like us?

        • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          2 years ago

          As far as we know it’s business as usual but I would make sure to have a copy of everything I’ve bought if I were you, when a business gets passed around like that (and sold at a loss) it doesn’t bode well…

          • andrew_bidlaw@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 years ago

            Yeah, right. Thanks to BC it’s so easy.

        • tankplanker@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 years ago

          They got rid of a whole bunch of staff, so the service is effectively on life support.

          https://www.latimes.com/entertainment-arts/music/story/2023-10-16/bandcamp-layoffs-songtradr-epic-games#:~:text=Bandcamp.&text=Indie music hub Bandcamp has,video game publisher Epic Games.

          • andrew_bidlaw@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            Shit. Thanks you too for these news.

        • hyperhopper@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 years ago

          They are removing lots of the nice things they did like days when an the revenue goes to artists

  • BlackSkinnedJew@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    I’m doing great with xManager so I don’t give a flying fuck about this haha

    • IanSomnia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 years ago

      What is xManager?

      • mcchessers@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 years ago

        I wondered this myself, so Googled it, and found https://www.xmanagerapp.com/

        … And I’m still none the wiser. All I learned that it’s for Android and does… something.

        • BlackSkinnedJew@lemmynsfw.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 years ago

          Pirated Spotify premium for Android.

      • BlackSkinnedJew@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        13
        ·
        2 years ago

        Search for it in Google “xManager download”

  • Whirling_Cloudburst@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Its not a bug, its a feature. The end game has lots of backdoor deals.

  • The Barto@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

  • AliasWyvernspur@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    deleted by creator

  • Guster@lemmy.world
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 years ago

    As someone who have distributed on all platforms, Spotify is still the best. Sure it doesn’t pay that well, but it does enable your songs to get discovered and played

    • nik0@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      2 years ago

      This is incredibly off topic here considering the fact we’re mostly talking about Google and the company giving a market advantage to companies that could cut them some “deals”

  • Dulusa@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    So they don’t pay fees, they dont pay artist and they never made a Profit. But for some fucking reason are allowed to dictate the music industry.

    For anyone reading this, that still uses Spotify, a big fuck you from the heart of an artist!!! You’re the reason that abominations like Spotify are able to continue…

    • mihnt@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      deleted by creator

      • Dulusa@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        This will continue, as long as people dont stop using the products of this shitty companies. So yes, everybody who uses Spotify made the choice to give them their money, so that they can continue with this bs.

        You can blame the Management or whoever as much as you want, but as long as you dont change your behaviour and stop using their products, they dont have a reason to stop.

        So yes, its your fault too!

Technology@lemmy.world

technology@lemmy.world

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: [email protected]

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


  • @[email protected]
  • @[email protected]
  • @[email protected]
  • @[email protected]
Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 3.31K users / day
  • 10.2K users / week
  • 18.1K users / month
  • 38.8K users / 6 months
  • 1 local subscriber
  • 72K subscribers
  • 11.7K Posts
  • 281K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • L3s@lemmy.world
  • enu@lemmy.world
  • Technopagan@lemmy.world
  • L4sBot@lemmy.world
  • L3s@hackingne.ws
  • L4s@hackingne.ws
  • BE: 0.19.7
  • Modlog
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org