• queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    125
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    2 years ago

    What a fucking joke. It’s amazing how all these countries set weak goals for themselves and then fail anyway.

    We’re all going to die lol

    • Random Dent@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      57
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      The UK likes to go the other way by talking up a ridiculous goal and then immediately failing it, like "Our goal is to produce zero CO2 and become the global leader in renewables by 2025” and then immediately open a new coal mine.

      • SheeEttin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        32
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        2 years ago

        That’s basically what Germany did. They recently shut down their nuclear plants and restarted their coal plants.

    • Samsy@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Yes, but the goals in germany are written into a law, and the highest council actually blaming the government for failed goals.

    • hoshikarakitaridia@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 years ago

      German here.

      Even back under Merkel, elected parties had a habit of defining good goals and then rendering them impossible to hit through policy. This meant that no one could fault them for trying, and no one could fault them for not being able to hit them.

      Nowadays my countrymen aren’t as stupid anymore. That doesn’t mean we can do anything about it, but especially since Merkel we don’t believe any of these leaks anymore.

    • I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      It’s amazing how all these countries set weak goal

      It’s can kicking. Make a promise for something 25 years in the future. Who cares if the country can’t meet it? You’ll likely be out of office or retired by that point. That’s the next person’s problem.

        • PsychedSy@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 years ago

          You kid, but we’re not gonna get greenhouse gases under control. We’re gonna find a way to stabilize temps and kick the can down the road to the next issue co2 causes.

          • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            That’s fallacious reasoning.

            Just because climate engineering is the only way to stabilize temperatures doesn’t actually mean it can be done. That’s all hypothetical tech, just like carbon capture and other fairy tales we tell ourselves to cope with the reality of the end of the fucking world.

            I’ll tell you what will happen. We won’t do anything to stop or slow climate change and we’ll reach a tipping point, after which society will rapidly collapse into warring factions and any hope of stabilizing the climate will be gone until we have a nuclear winter reset.

  • lntl@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    This is the German plan:

    1. Shutdown the nuclear plants
    2. Burn more lignite
    3. WFH

    The council said assumptions made by the transport ministry on the effectiveness of the planned and already implemented measures, such as a discounted national rail ticket, a CO2 surcharge on truck tolls and increased working from home, were also optimistic. “Private vehicle individual transport is not addressed, so to speak. And that is ultimately a gap in the transport programme,” Brigitte Knopf, deputy chairwoman of the council, told a news conference presenting the report findings on Tuesday

    The plan for transportation emissions, 2/3 of the target to be cut, is WFH. Yikes!

    • GenEcon@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Funny, because the energy sector was the only on track to fulfill the targets. Last year it even overshot its targets and is expected to again save more CO2 as planned in 2023.

      Maybe, just maybe, its more relevant that other sectors are managed by the FDP (market liberals) and SPD (social democrats), while energy is managed by die Grünen (greens).

      • lntl@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        Do you know about the transportation sector? It is where 2/3 of Germanys planned reduction is.

    • nexusband@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      2 years ago

      How about you guys stop this bullshit about the nuclear plants stuff? They were scheduled to be shut down for a VERY long time, the biggest mistake was selling out nearly all the renewable energy manufacturing to China. Nuclear power is only making a profit, if it’s subsidized like crazy.

      Not only that - A LOT of Germans are actively against putting up more wind power, let alone photovoltaics. Which is what over 50% voted “against” as well. Those that didn’t go voting, have lost all say in it, so yeah. That’s not a political issue, we Germans are the issue.

      • JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        So why not modernize or replace the nuclear plants? Battery storage isn’t anywhere close to being able to store baseline energy for a full renewable grid.

        I agree it’s a perception issue, but that doesn’t mean nothing can be done about it.

        • nexusband@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          Because the money for modernizing, let alone replacing those plants is a lot better invested in renewables. Battery Storage is very close to store baseline energy, not in Lithium Batteries though and the projected cost for Redox-Flow Batteries is going to be falling like crazy. It already is on the same level as Lithium, and while it is less energy dense, it’s safer, easier to operate and especially longer to operate. The Dalian VFB in Liaoning, Dalian, China is one of the first “bigger” stations to come online, but there are already a lot of plans. I also have one in my house.

            • nexusband@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 years ago

              7,5 kWh, max. continous power is “only” 3 kW, but that’s more than enough to get the house over the night and even for quite some time in to the next day if the weather is bad. Non flammable, no higher insurance rating, and so on.

      • Brocon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        You forgot to add that we were once leader in solar tech, but that industry got destroyed willingly by the then ruling CDU and Peter Altmeyer.

        • nexusband@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          No - it was destroyed because some idiot higher up in those companies decied, it’s cheaper to sell to China. Same goes for Kuka and countless other spineless fu**s in those companies. Yes, politics plays A role, but they do not make the decisions.

      • lntl@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        Who cares about renewables v nuclear? Either one will get us there.

        If I understand correctly Germany does not have a plan to address transportation emissions.

        • nexusband@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 years ago

          If I understand correctly Germany does not have a plan to address transportation emissions.

          Who has in the EU? Switching to BEVs will do shit overall.

  • UnfortunateShort@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 years ago

    I mean, they have only really started since the corrupt right-wing shitheads are not in office anymore. Now we only have to deal with a minister of transport who just refuses to work and claims policies the greens pushed for are his achievement lol

  • Astroturfed@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 years ago

    You’d think the shock of the gas shortage from Russia would of been a wake up call and they’d be ahead of a timeline like this…

  • GivingEuropeASpook@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    Well duh? Are they nationalizing all carbon emitting industries to begin a managed decline of the industry or are they hoping economic magic and wishful thinking will work?