• queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    125
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    2 years ago

    What a fucking joke. It’s amazing how all these countries set weak goals for themselves and then fail anyway.

    We’re all going to die lol

    • Random Dent@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      57
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      The UK likes to go the other way by talking up a ridiculous goal and then immediately failing it, like "Our goal is to produce zero CO2 and become the global leader in renewables by 2025” and then immediately open a new coal mine.

      • SheeEttin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        32
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        2 years ago

        That’s basically what Germany did. They recently shut down their nuclear plants and restarted their coal plants.

    • Samsy@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Yes, but the goals in germany are written into a law, and the highest council actually blaming the government for failed goals.

    • hoshikarakitaridia@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 years ago

      German here.

      Even back under Merkel, elected parties had a habit of defining good goals and then rendering them impossible to hit through policy. This meant that no one could fault them for trying, and no one could fault them for not being able to hit them.

      Nowadays my countrymen aren’t as stupid anymore. That doesn’t mean we can do anything about it, but especially since Merkel we don’t believe any of these leaks anymore.

    • I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      It’s amazing how all these countries set weak goal

      It’s can kicking. Make a promise for something 25 years in the future. Who cares if the country can’t meet it? You’ll likely be out of office or retired by that point. That’s the next person’s problem.

        • PsychedSy@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 years ago

          You kid, but we’re not gonna get greenhouse gases under control. We’re gonna find a way to stabilize temps and kick the can down the road to the next issue co2 causes.

          • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            That’s fallacious reasoning.

            Just because climate engineering is the only way to stabilize temperatures doesn’t actually mean it can be done. That’s all hypothetical tech, just like carbon capture and other fairy tales we tell ourselves to cope with the reality of the end of the fucking world.

            I’ll tell you what will happen. We won’t do anything to stop or slow climate change and we’ll reach a tipping point, after which society will rapidly collapse into warring factions and any hope of stabilizing the climate will be gone until we have a nuclear winter reset.