• lntl@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    This is the German plan:

    1. Shutdown the nuclear plants
    2. Burn more lignite
    3. WFH

    The council said assumptions made by the transport ministry on the effectiveness of the planned and already implemented measures, such as a discounted national rail ticket, a CO2 surcharge on truck tolls and increased working from home, were also optimistic. “Private vehicle individual transport is not addressed, so to speak. And that is ultimately a gap in the transport programme,” Brigitte Knopf, deputy chairwoman of the council, told a news conference presenting the report findings on Tuesday

    The plan for transportation emissions, 2/3 of the target to be cut, is WFH. Yikes!

    • GenEcon@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Funny, because the energy sector was the only on track to fulfill the targets. Last year it even overshot its targets and is expected to again save more CO2 as planned in 2023.

      Maybe, just maybe, its more relevant that other sectors are managed by the FDP (market liberals) and SPD (social democrats), while energy is managed by die Grünen (greens).

      • lntl@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        Do you know about the transportation sector? It is where 2/3 of Germanys planned reduction is.

    • nexusband@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      2 years ago

      How about you guys stop this bullshit about the nuclear plants stuff? They were scheduled to be shut down for a VERY long time, the biggest mistake was selling out nearly all the renewable energy manufacturing to China. Nuclear power is only making a profit, if it’s subsidized like crazy.

      Not only that - A LOT of Germans are actively against putting up more wind power, let alone photovoltaics. Which is what over 50% voted “against” as well. Those that didn’t go voting, have lost all say in it, so yeah. That’s not a political issue, we Germans are the issue.

      • JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        So why not modernize or replace the nuclear plants? Battery storage isn’t anywhere close to being able to store baseline energy for a full renewable grid.

        I agree it’s a perception issue, but that doesn’t mean nothing can be done about it.

        • nexusband@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          Because the money for modernizing, let alone replacing those plants is a lot better invested in renewables. Battery Storage is very close to store baseline energy, not in Lithium Batteries though and the projected cost for Redox-Flow Batteries is going to be falling like crazy. It already is on the same level as Lithium, and while it is less energy dense, it’s safer, easier to operate and especially longer to operate. The Dalian VFB in Liaoning, Dalian, China is one of the first “bigger” stations to come online, but there are already a lot of plans. I also have one in my house.

            • nexusband@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 years ago

              7,5 kWh, max. continous power is “only” 3 kW, but that’s more than enough to get the house over the night and even for quite some time in to the next day if the weather is bad. Non flammable, no higher insurance rating, and so on.

      • Brocon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        You forgot to add that we were once leader in solar tech, but that industry got destroyed willingly by the then ruling CDU and Peter Altmeyer.

        • nexusband@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          No - it was destroyed because some idiot higher up in those companies decied, it’s cheaper to sell to China. Same goes for Kuka and countless other spineless fu**s in those companies. Yes, politics plays A role, but they do not make the decisions.

      • lntl@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        Who cares about renewables v nuclear? Either one will get us there.

        If I understand correctly Germany does not have a plan to address transportation emissions.

        • nexusband@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 years ago

          If I understand correctly Germany does not have a plan to address transportation emissions.

          Who has in the EU? Switching to BEVs will do shit overall.