• Fizz@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 months ago

    No way, tell me that isnt real. I remember hearing a patent about being able to deliver ads over hdmi but dont tell me it actually got implemented.

  • slumlordthanatos@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 months ago

    Instead of buying a TV, look for a digital signage display. It’s a TV, but with none of the “smart” crap on it.

    Alternatively, just don’t hook your device up to the internet.

    • renzev@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      This is good advice, but I really wish we lived in a world where consumers could bond together and get laws passed that make this type of crap illegal so that buying TV’s (or any type of appliance for that matter) didn’t involve having to do research on weird non-consumer hardware just to have a nice experience.

      EDIT: some morons in my replies keep on saying shit about “voting republican” and We Do In OtHeR CoUnTRiEs. I’m not american, I don’t live in america, and I cannot remember the last time I set foot in america. Shut the fuck up, nobody asked you.

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        In other words, you wish we lived in a democracy instead of a plutocracy. 'Cause that’s exactly how it’s supposed to work. This thread is squarely about the FTC failing to do its goddamn job, because this should not be legal.

        • wheeldawg@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          If they were, they should be free. Yet there’s still triple and quad digit prices on these things that probably cost like 8% of that to build (because of slave labor probably), and the subsidy on top should mean they’re literally paying us monthly to have their screen.

      • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        They are also capable of running 24/7 without ever overheating, no matter the location. And have extra software specialized for signage.

        It isn’t just a marketing gimmick.

        • shastaxc@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Yeah sounds perfect for my living room. I’ll definitely pay an extra $3k for those features.

          Recommending digital signage for personal TVs is still a bad recommendation.

  • mlg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    Looked at the CES reveals and aside from some minor improvements, its nothing but overloaded AI crap.

    Even on TVs from 10 years ago, the first thing you had to do was turn off the stupid auto frame generation, smoothing, lighting, and other effects so you can actually enjoy your content in original detail and correct FPS.

    • Dasus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Well yeah, minor improvements really stack up.

      A friend is buying a TV or a screen for console gaming anyway and man, the TV’s are actually pretty decent for gaming nowadays. I haven’t checked out any for several years.

      I bought a UHD LED tv in like 2016 and what a POS it is compared to these modern models. I mean I haven’t had it for years gave it to my sister but still.

      I thought they looked pretty damn nifty. And AI isn’t a curse word when it comes to everything. I get being annoyed at the marketing, I am too, but, like isn’t Nvidia DLSS AI? That’s shit’s actually good.

      • autriyo@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        DLLS and similars are nice for running newer games on outdated hardware.

        Sadly it also enables studios to cheap out on optimization, you shouldn’t need upscaling for 1080p medium on a new GPU.

    • relic_@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Feel like I’m the only one that likes the soap opera effect to some extent 🙈

    • Zacryon@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      I’ve read at some other post that some smart TVs won’t work at all if you don’t connect it to the internet.

      Read with caution, I haven’t verified this.

      • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        I’ve also heard people say that they’ll automatically connect to any open wifi networks. People make up a lot of stuff. Just don’t tell your display device how to send any 1s or 0s to any server outside your home, and you’ll be fine

  • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    Oops, stepped on another $1200 landmine did you? Should have researched where you put your foot. Everyone knows this neighborhood is littered with landmines. No, there’s nothing we can really do about it except hand out these exhaustive charts and navigation tools. Of course they need to constantly get re-updated and are themselves periodically hijacked by the pro-landmine industry to turn into a second-tier grift. But that just means you have to research who you research for your TV research.

    Don’t worry, you’ll get it eventually. God gave us two legs for a reason.

  • Synapse@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    My current TV has started to die. It’s developing a purple spot that starts to be very distracting. I am not excited about researching a new model that doesn’t pull out this kind a shit on me. I don’t intend to ever connect it to the Internet. My current TV is nothing more than a big display for my NVIDIA shield TV and the next one will be the same.

      • zod000@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        I got their 1080p 43" “dumb” model for $150 not too long ago. I wouldn’t choose it for my main living room TV, but it is perfectly fine for what I needed it for and they can’t retroactively make it worse like the Roku tv it replaced.

        • theangryseal@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          I think mine was around 300 and is 47”. I don’t watch a lot of tv, it’s mostly there for the kids. The 4k picture looks amazing when I do use it. I do most of my gaming on my Steam Deck and I dock that to a 720p Samsung I’ve had for 18 years now (Was very high end when I got it). It is good enough for me.

          I’m about to inherit my daughter’s gaming laptop and I’ll plug that in the bedroom and be happy with it too.

          • zod000@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            $300 isn’t too bad of a price for a 47" 4K where they aren’t getting extra money from your data and ads. I went for the 1080p model because at the distance we sit at it was impossible to tell the difference based on the 4K Roku TV is replaced.

  • Björn Tantau@swg-empire.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Not as bad as this, but when I moved to a new town I got a free big TV with my new ISP. I was going with that ISP anyways so a free 4k HDR TV on top was a nice bonus.

    I wish I had gotten some other bonus. Viewing angle is atrocious and it is impossible to get rid of the input lag (no there isn’t a gaming mode or similar) so no games with precise timing can be played.

    So now we have a big living room TV that is too good to replace with something better but bad enough to be a little bit annoying.