• TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    182
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    1 month ago

    But it literally did nail it?

    It’s giving you a list of the items that were received in the 12 Days of Christmas. And it’s correct.

    12*1=12

    11*2=22

    10*3=30

    And so on.

    If you wanted the lyrics, that’s a different question.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      17
      ·
      1 month ago

      Only if you assume that everything on the list was additive to the initial gifts every time. I think you can infer from the context of the song, the holiday, how gift-giving works, etc. that they were just appending to the list of gifts each day.

      But those are the sort of things that LLMs are incapable of doing.

      • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        41
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        That’s what the lyrics say though.

        On the X day of Christmas my true love gave to me, X [item], X-1 [item], etc.

        The song explicitly states they give this stuff every day.

        • Moobythegoldensock@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          I’ve always taken it as they’re tabulating the gifts:

          “Wow, today he gave me three french hens! Plus I have the two turtle doves from yesterday and the partridge in a pear tree from Christmas day!”

          • crapwittyname@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            14
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            All songs should be taken literally, which is why I eat love and prayers, and have a restraining order against me for trying to drag Hozier into a church at knifepoint.

          • eronth@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            1 month ago

            Either interpretation is valid, though. Either one is an absurd amount of gifts, I would not put it past the gifter to have made an extravagant display of re-giving the stuff from days before each day.

          • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            1 month ago

            I’d be interested if this sort of exaggeration humor was common in Victorian England. Giving them all those things each day has a very “Lucy and Ethel at the chocolate factory” vibe that would be very amusing after a wassail or two.

          • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 month ago

            “on the second day of Christmas my true love gave to me, two turtle doves and a partridge in a pear tree.”

            It takes a bit of mental gymnastics to assert that on the second day of Christmas he did not send two turtle doves and a partridge in a pear tree.

            If I said yesterday I gave my friend a pork pie and today I gave my friend some spaghetti and a pork pie, you would not come to the conclusion that my friend did not receive a second pork pie.

            • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 month ago

              I’d say it depends on whether you were singing it to me or not. Songs kind of have to keep these things brief a lot of the time. Also, the lyrics of this song don’t make much sense to begin with. 🤷

      • teft@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        I’ve never assumed that interpretation. I always thought the gifts were given each day. So you end up with twelve partridges and pear trees at the end. The song says “on the nth day of christmas my true love gave to me” doesn’t that imply you are receiving all those gifts that day?

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          1 month ago

          I guess this also illustrates a problem. Maybe it should at least say the song has been interpreted in more than one way before doing its count.

  • Alexstarfire@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    71
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Kinda did depending on how you look at it. 5 golden rings is said 8 times, for a total of 40. Same appears to be true for all the other items but I’m not checking them all.

  • dinckel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    1 month ago

    When will the AI slop end?

    Most of common information is usually wrong. When programmers gaslight themselves into using it, the code is almost always wrong. Artists are all pissed, because both Nvidia and "Open"AI trained their data on hundreds of terabytes of stolen data too.

    The only ones still satisfied with this, are the top 0.01% billionaires, who continue selling these products to companies, who in turn buy this only because of peer pressure

    • EnderMB@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      I say this as someone in big tech, AI is pushed because it’s an easy lie to keep big companies viewed as innovating to shareholders. I say this knowing that Google, Microsoft, Apple, and Amazon have contributed significantly to AI research in the last few years alongside the obvious contributions of OpenAI - the goal isn’t groundbreaking AI work, but to act as a smoke-screen to show that nothing else has been delivered.

      Google has lost ground in advertising, and is losing customers on many of their services. Amazon is losing ground in cloud computing and in retail. Apple has stagnated with recent poor releases. Microsoft has made ground in cloud, but has struggled in advertising, Xbox, Office, and Windows. They use GenAI to keep their stock price high, otherwise they’d drop like a sack of shit because shareholders would say “what the fuck have you even done in the last half a decade?”

      • bobalot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 month ago

        This makes so much sense.

        I always thought, surely their higher ups must know this is utter garbage?

        They do but it’s just to scam investors.

      • dovah@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Absolutely. We got so much crap from the markets and customers because “it’s 2024 and you still don’t have AI in your product”. So we threw in an integration to a local LLM to please them and keep them from leaving to our inferior-in-every-other-way-but-have-AI competitors.

      • Excrubulent@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Yes, the companies have a reputation to protect, but it’s also just a standard hype-cycle. If you pay attention to tech history these things always go in cycles like this.

        Whether the tech is actually useful or not doesn’t actually matter. What matters is whether you can convince investors to fork over the cash with a shiny presentation.

        The tech industry has basically habituated to surviving on selling us bullshit through hype cycles. I think it’s become dependent on them.

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    Damn, and I thought the original gift-giver in the song was already being totally unreasonable.

    Can you imagine all the droppings their true love would have to clean up from all those birds?

  • Zier@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    So… did I miss the cooking time on this recipe? 350 for how long? And this recipe serves how many??? What is happening right now?!?!!???

    • AdamEatsAss@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      I was always taught 350 for 2 hrs but will occasionally do 400 for 1.5 hrs if I’m in a hurry. Also I usually leave out the drummers, they get stuck in my food processor.