U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon declined to recuse herself from the case of Ryan Routh, who is charged with attempting to assassinate Donald Trump last month. The judge appointed to the federal bench by the alleged victim in Routh’s case brushed aside the defendant’s concerns about Trump’s praise of Cannon and the possibility that he could promote her to even higher office if he’s elected next week.

“I have no control over what private citizens, members of the media, or public officials or candidates elect to say about me or my judicial rulings,” Cannon wrote in an order published Tuesday. “I have never spoken to or met former President Trump except in connection with his required presence at an official judicial proceeding, through counsel,” added the judge who dismissed Trump’s classified documents case in July.

      • formergijoe@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Eh, by the time this goes to trial Trump could be in office. Then, as day one dictator, Trump declarse anyone who helped Ukraine at all are wartime traitors, use the guy’s weird recruiting thing as evidence, and just summarily execute the guy.

        Edit: she’s also on the short list to be AG. She may not even be a judge when this goes to trial.

    • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      An appeal, sure.

      But I doubt they’re going to get a mistrial on it. Dude is guilty as hell. Probably going to lead to reduced sentencing, though. (All though that’s still gonna be at “you’re fucked” levels,)

      Edit: even if there is a mistrial, they’ll certainly be allowed to retry.

        • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 month ago

          I dunno.

          Maybe they like the propaganda of trump getting shot at?

          Their legal strategies are written in crayon, so maybe they just think a sentence of a second lifetime is meaningful.

    • FlowVoid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Doubtful. For the same reason that Trump criticizing / threatening judges isn’t grounds for recusal or mistrial.

  • Sanctus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    1 month ago

    That dude is getting the entire courthouse thrown at him to prove her allegiance to Fussolini is completely unwavering, again.

  • GroundedGator@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    This is a bit of a non-story.

    Department of Justice already decided not to reassign the case.

    Backed into a corner, the Justice Department finally took a stance on Cannon’s partiality on Oct. 21—at least in the context of the Routh prosecution. In a perfunctory, one-and-a-half-page filing, the government opposed Routh’s motion, stating that it did “not present either facts or case law requiring recusal on this record in light of the controlling standard.”

    Given that the Justice Department has already ruled on this, there was no way that Cannon was going to say “You might be right, I can’t be impartial.” Has she done that it would have also guaranteed her removal from the documents case when it is eventually reopened. Though I suspect she’ll be removed from that anyway.

  • charade_you_are@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Not exactly on topic, but she looks like she could be a linebacker on a pro nfl team. That neck and jaw, both thick as fuck. I’m assuming the project 2025 team wrote that statement like pretty much everything that comes out of her stupid fucking mouth.