• Corigan@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    110
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    8 months ago

    Who the fuck cares what’s with this constant desire to try and shit on steam

    • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      83
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      8 months ago

      Because they tried competing and it didn’t work because they kept offering an inferior product, so they’re trying to weasel Steam out of the market

      • homicidalrobot@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        38
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        As for as storefronts go, which is what’s being talked about here, they are competing and winning. With a fraction of the employees other companies employ for storefront work. Origin (Rest Unpeacefully) and Uplay never stood a chance and epic has had plenty of time to market saturate. The company not being publicly traded doesn’t prevent competition, it prevents investor interests like quashing competition.

        • Jack Hughman@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          35
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          They meant the other companies tried competing and failed so they’re pushing these anti-valve lawsuits and articles.

      • ampersandrew@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        27
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        They’ve touted before that they may be the most profitable company per employee on earth. They make a few billion in profit per year with a payroll of a few hundred employees.

        • lanolinoil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          8 months ago

          Must be – I can’t think of anyone else that could come close unless you count Berkshire Hathaway or something

      • GoodEye8@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        I don’t know, there’s plenty of anti-Valve rhetoric on Lemmy. Plenty of people try to spin it as Valve having a low employee count because they have a lot of contractors. One guy was making a point that Valve employee count is much lower because they buy in AMD GPUs for the Steam Deck… As if Valve should buy chip manufacturing plants and design and manufacture their own GPUs.

        Even here somewhere below (or maybe up later) in this thread someone said

        Also, a company can pretend to have 10 employees if it instead hires 1000 contractors to do the actual work.

        Which is an argument, if you can prove Valve is buying in 10 times the amount of contractors as they have employees for positions that should go to full-time employees. But I very much doubt such information exists.

    • ripcord@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      8 months ago

      I definitely didn’t interpret this as shitting on Steam. In fact, the opposite.

  • Rayspekt@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    95
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    These numbers keep getting smaller with every headline. Tomorrow it says that Steam runs off of Gabens private NAS.

  • Wilzax@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    78
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Failure of larger companies to make a competitive alternative to steam is not anticompetitive behavior on the part of Valve

    • 6gybf@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      40
      ·
      8 months ago

      Seems like a good example of how running a company for the shareholders doesn’t produce a a better product after all.

      • Rakonat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        8 months ago

        Precisely what the share holders don’t want people to know. They worship money and what the public to think more money = more good. If people realize these investor backed products are generally not anything better than someone can make in their garage they’ll stop buying overpriced junk. So here we are about to see how the sausage gets made.

        • DigitalDilemma@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          8 months ago

          shareholders … worship money

          Well, that literally is the only reason to become a shareholder, right?

          I mean, technically you’re participating in the management of the company and can influence decisions such as environmental benefits, but it feels like that only happens when there’s secondary benefits that also improve profit.

    • HauntedCupcake@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      8 months ago

      The case seems like such a reach. At worst it’s an effective monopoly for devs, not consumers. Devs have a really hard time selling elsewhere.

      That said, I love Steam and think it’s genuinely one of the best companies out there. And whilst it’s not great that they’re so big, they aren’t that big due to anti-competitive behaviour. It’s quite the opposite. You can add non-Steam games to your library and use Steam features. The fucking Steam deck isn’t locked down, and you can install non-Steam games. Just because Uplay wants to log me out every time I reboot doesn’t mean Steam should be sued.

      There are so many other companies more deserving of the lawsuit

  • Katana314@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    62
    ·
    8 months ago

    But Infinite growth!! How do you affirm the ability for a new CEO to make tough decisions without going on insane hiring sprees to show growth, and then firing those same people to cut corners and also show growth!? The economy needs blood!

    Oh wait, they’re not publically traded? I thought only corner shops were allowed to stay off the market.

    Okay, end savage stock market mockery.

    • fishos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      51
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      A lot of companies have been trying to sue them and are trying to tarnish their name in any way possible because their case is already shaky at best. The whole “monopoly” thing despite competition existing and Valve only being on top because they’re the best feature wise stuff.

      • Zirconium@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        28
        ·
        8 months ago

        And a lot of publishers already have their own launchers that dont need steam or use steam. Theyre just dogshit

        • fishos@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          8 months ago

          Exactly. It’s hard to argue that Steam has a monopoly when the other launchers exist and suck. Steam, despite its flaws, is still the best storefront we have. Gabe is the person who taught us that piracy is largely a service problem, not a price problem. People will pay when the paid option is quality.

    • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      “Companies have too many employees!” cries the guy who will lose his job if all companies are run like Valve.

      Them having few employees doesn’t prevent them from taking a 30% cut on all sales and making billions in profit and having a billionaire at their head, so are people expecting that if other companies were “trimming down some fat” it wouldn’t simply result in them making more profit because prices wouldn’t come down or something?

      Also, a company can pretend to have 10 employees if it instead hires 1000 contractors to do the actual work.

      • Zahille7@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Someone’s upset that they’re following their own successful business model.

        I get that people don’t like wealthy people regardless, but Gabe is probably one of the few that’s actually not bad.

        I don’t know where this contractor bullshit is coming from; if anything that should be aimed at Microsoft.

        • mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 months ago

          I don’t know where this contractor bullshit is coming from; if anything that should be aimed at Microsoft.

          TBF, Valve does hire contractors to help work on Proton and Steam OS. I have no idea what the terms and compensation are, I’m just pointing out that they do hire contractors

        • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          11
          ·
          8 months ago

          There are no good billionaires, the reason they exist is because people like you and me are paying more for things than they’re truly worth, billionaires exist because of the surplus we pay.

      • uis@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        “Companies have too many employees!” cries the guy who will lose his job if all companies are run like Valve.

        Less wasting resources, good. Ah, you mean under capitalism.

  • Vespair@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    8 months ago

    I genuinely can’t fathom why this number should be bigger. What am I supposed to take away from this knowledge? Far as I’m concerned, Valve is still a rare comparative good guy in the dense-packed field of bad guys in industry

    • exanime@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      8 months ago

      Because we have been led to believe that the “titans” of industry are these super above average smart people. In reality it’s a bunch of nepo babies with no unique skills (other than, perhaps, a good education) which only copy each other.

      After covid, all big IT companies started hiring like mad men… Then they all started firing people like crazy. They are driven more by speculation on their stock price and FOMO than any actual business strategy

    • npz@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 months ago

      Maybe in the distant pre-cloud past, when sysadmins were still a thing, you’d expect a bigger staff to be needed to manage a bigger datacenter.

      But a few devs who know how to spin up a thing with auto-scaling can accomplish a lot

      • zalgotext@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        But a few devs who know how to spin up a thing with auto-scaling can accomplish a lot

        This is true, but I still find it impressive that Valve has seemingly managed to find 80 all in one spot. My company can barely find one or two

    • ysjet@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Because Epic Games is really hoping to turn people against steam any way they can other than actually improving their service or morals.

  • Kedly@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    These “B-B-BUT STEAMS MONOPOLY CROWD” really do think we have stockholm/boot licker syndrome as if a good 60%+ of steam users didnt know how to Pirate games if we truly didnt like the service

  • kamenoko@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    8 months ago

    I mean that’s awesome.

    Ultimately they’re only responsible for the steam client and the servers.

  • ulterno@lemmy.kde.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    8 months ago

    That feels like free advertising to potential job-seekers.

    If just a few staff are running the whole thing, it means they are all probably the kind that do more actual work and less politics. That means, if anyone interested in learning fast and getting good at their field were to work there, they would have the time of their life.

    CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

  • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    32
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    They’re making their machine more and more efficient, storage and bandwidth just gets cheaper with time… Yet, they still need their 30% cut to make billions in profit.

    Wealth redistribution when?