• AhismaMiasma@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    41
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    6 months ago

    Assuming proper training and ammunition, they’re perfectly capable for hunting small to medium game such as rabbits, coyotes, tyrants, wild hogs, and whitetail deer.

    • nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      I don’t think some people know how much damage a pack of wild hogs can cause to crops and farmland in short order. If it wasn’t going to be an AR-15 keeping them off the farm it would be another intermediate or higher caliber semi-automatic rifle that accepts standard magazines. Everyone want’s to laugh at that excuse until the farmer has a bad season and has to sell his land to Bill Gates or Chinese investors, they don’t exactly make large margins.

      • ikidd@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        We cleaned about 250 boar out of our farm over a four year period with the same 3-5 shot rifles we hunt deer and moose with. They mill around long enough you can reload. I have an SKS but I don’t bother, I’d rather sneak over a hill and pop half a dozen slowly and cleanly with my .338. And I can do it from far enough away that they don’t really get upset until 3 of them are lying on the ground, kicking.

        • DudeImMacGyver@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          5.56 is a ridiculous waste of money for rabbits and totally excessive. 22 or even a pellet gun would be perfectly adequate and waaaaaay cheaper.

    • umbrella@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      i was under the assumption an ar15 would explode something like a rabbit without useable trace?

  • BobGnarley@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    Its a good thing the second amendment doesn’t just include a clause for hunting! People often forget it says

    “A well regulated Militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed.”

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Indeed it doesn’t protect hunting or self defence at all. Only the collective defense.

  • Grayox@lemmy.mlOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    For the record I would rather 45 lose and continue to drag the GOP down than have a quick death.

    • Transporter Room 3@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      I’d rather he rots in a state jail for the rest of his life, and give him the same standard of care as every other inmate. No special treatment. If he needs to be put in solitary “for his own protection” then so be it. It’s the system people like him loves to protect.

      To be clear, I think the US treatment of prisoners is inhumane and bordering on criminal (and all too often crossing said border) and the whole penal system needs drastic change and made entirely nonprofit, and the constitution needs another Ammendment because the 13th was a mistake.

      But that’s not the world we live in, and the people who crafted this world should be forced to live in it.

      • Grayox@lemmy.mlOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        6 months ago

        That would be so nice. Wish we focused on rehabilitation instead of retaliation in our criminal justice system. Its such an ass backwards system.

        • Transporter Room 3@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          6 months ago

          I love seeing prison photos from other countries that show how well prisoners can be treated while still being in prison. Countries with extremely low recidivism.

          And there are plenty of people I know who would see that and balk, because “that’s being too soft”

          I’ve had people insist that stronger punishment over rehabilitation is what you need, and ignore my bringing up that there’s decades and decades of data that shows otherwise.

          At best, the harsh punishments serve as a deterrent to other people doing similar things that might result in similar punishment, but that just creates new and sneaker crimes and criminals. It’s better to rehabilitate, help people turn their poor choices around, and eliminate the cause of the problems that led to the crime in the first place.

          But that’s “too much work” so might as well not even try, right? As we all know, the light bulb famously was invented on the first couple tries.

    • Jumpingspiderman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      6 months ago

      I would prefer Trump to have a long and miserable life in prison. Preferably in an underground cell in SuperMax somewhere. For his own protection of course.

  • mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    hunting human rifles.

    let’s be honest, it was designed as a lightweight emergency carbine made of space aged materials. 60 years later we’re arguing if the founding fathers meant bump stocks and cmags when they said well regulated militia.

  • Iron Lynx@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    Y’know, this is in this weird spot where it’s right between canon and as seen (which, by the way, can be explained even with canonical things). If it was truly as seen, the shots would have gone way wide. If it was truly canon, the Reps would be scrambling for a new candidate now.

    • Iron Lynx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 months ago

      The explanation for Stormtroopers’ shoddy marksmanship on screen in A New Hope is because Vader wanted Leia & company to escape, but by the skin of their teeth, so that they would basically drop their guard the instant The Falcon took off from the Death Star and not realise there was a tracker bug installed. If Vader just let them fly off unopposed, that would probably be hella sus, and they’d probably pull over at the first asteroid to find and chuck said tracker bug. So the Stormtroopers were specifically instructed to shoot to thrill, not to kill.

      When faced with opposition without plot armour and reasons to keep them alive, Stormtroopers are fucking brutal, as seen in The Empire Strikes Back - Hoth was somewhere between a decisive Imperial victory and an Imperial Curb Stomp