It’s clearly two sandwichs.
The bold move would be to have the other side have the peanut butter and jelly swapped around. I’d call that the ouroboroswich.
[edit] what if it only had 1 cut? I think that’d be a taco
[edit 2] a torus cut once makes a cylinder. So really, it’s a double decker sandwich
[edit 3] but it’s cylinders that loop back on themselves. Is it a mobiuswhich or a Klien Wich?
[edit n] help
I’m here for this energy
Okay hear me out, what about the peanut butter on one axis (either conventional sandwich, or this rotated 90 degrees) and the jelly as it is here
What are we dealing with then? This might transcend the cube system of food categorisation.
The Cube Rule is the most definitive and authoritative categorization of food topology I have encountered. I refer to it often in food related arguments.
But what is the abomination I’ve described? I don’t think it fits.
I’m not ready for a world where the cube rule isn’t all encompassing
Although the bagel half on the bottom and the top are split toroids, topologically they are flat (you can ‘deform’ it into a flat plane if you squish it). This is assuming it hasn’t been cut down the center as well.
The filling of PB&J is between the two starches. Therefore this is Food Type 2: Sandwich.
Okay but, what about down the centre as well? I think this is where the paved road ends
It is still a Type II sandwich, just that the middle portion is air.
In crappy text form it’s equivalent to:
Bread
PB&J | Air | PB&J
Bread
Okay so I think I’m failing miserably at articulating quite the monstrosity I’ve imagined. For illustrative purposes:
It’s an infinity sandwich.
I suppose it is neither a taco or a sand which, however it lives within the sandwich family. What’s weird is if we take the inner radius as it runs towards zero it would look no different to a sandwich (save the weirdly thick bread that looks similar to a burger), but it would be topologically different shape.
I suppose it depends on if you consider a bagle split more naturally a sandwich or not, and, if so, then it matters if the if the space of the filling being connected matters or not.
[edit] what if it only had 1 cut? I think that’d be a taco
deleted by creator
So answer is yes
The last time someone made a bagel with everything on it it put the universe in jeopardy.
It is a sandwich because the toppings are sandwiched between bread. But it’s not a good sandwich.
Now, they wouldn’t be toppings in this configuration, would they?
middling
Inbetwingers
deleted by creator
Top bun? Check
Bottom bun? Check
Yep, it’s a sandwich. I’d like to see a video of you eating it now.
Political lol
The most political a topic could possibly be, in fact.
Every day we stray further from the light of lord
It’s a sandwich, but it’s not a sandwich sandwich
According to that, I think OP would have a sandwich.
What do we call it if it is also cut and filled in the conventional bagel plane?
Sandwich cut in half
I realise that you are correct, but which way is the sandwich, and which way is the cut? It’s filled on both planes.
Some men aren’t looking for anything logical, like money. They can’t be bought, bullied, reasoned, or negotiated with. Some men just want to watch the world burn.
Technical definition is a 3-Torus sandwich, defined as any sandwich that is homeomorphic to the Cartesian product of three circles.
Isn’t it S_1 x S_1 x [0, 1] here though?
That, I believe, is what we refer to as an “abomination”
deleted by creator
Similar to tomatoes being botanically a fruit
More specifically, tomatoes are berries, as are bananas. But strawberries are not berries at all.
Cucumbers though
Strange flex, but okay.
