• 3volver@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    66
    ·
    7 months ago

    This shit actually hurts my soul. This is the type of shit as to why we might not make it. We have the technology to mitigate climate change yet we don’t because those in power don’t want to see their power decrease. It’s a serious reason why we might not make it. How do we even begin to take direct action? I really have no clue, this entire planet, life as we know it, is entirely fucked if we don’t do something soon. The US government gave billions to implement charging infrastructure and the corps did jack SHIT with it, the government has become the corps fuck pig, bent over dishing out money while getting fucked.

    • set_secret@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      Might not make it? Sorry man we’re literally looking down the barrel of end times.

      Human greed can only be stopped when the earth has nothing left to give.

      This is the reality we all exist in and 99% of us are powerless to change it, unless we all collectively agree to (spoiler we’re not gunna).

    • LappingDog@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      7 months ago

      Is there a number on the break even point where it’s better for the environment to buy a new EV than to keep driving an old ICE vehicle? I bike most days when I don’t need to buy more than a backpack of groceries or go more than 3 miles. Surely when you consider the carbon cost of refining materials and constructing a whole new vehicle, it doesn’t make sense in most situations for people who drive less than 30 minutes a day on average. This is of course assuming you have a current vehicle, new vehicles should have to be hybrid/EV in the modern era.

    • unreasonabro@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 months ago

      bro we’re so far past this lol

      it’s been too late for probably a decade now, get ready to starve cuz there’s only a couple years left

    • SeaJ@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      No. So many people misunderstand that. No, it does not simply mean you automatically sacrifice longterm profits. Fiduciary responsibility is pretty widely open to interpretation because shareholders overall can want different things. Some stocks barely budge in price but the board gives good dividends. Some companies make no profit for years upon years because they are pushing for growth. Just chalking this up to fiduciary responsibility is misguided and misses many big reasons why many boards choose short term profits while sacrificing longterm sustainability. Many get most of their earnings in stock. As long as they can keep the share price up long enough for them to make bank, they have little care about the longterm health of the company. This is one of the reasons that stock buybacks have been so big over the last decade.

  • VinnyDaCat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    Nothing surprising.

    EVs have been developed since the 90s at least as far as I know, and progress on them has been sabotaged at nearly every turn by the industry.

      • VinnyDaCat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 months ago

        Wasn’t aware of that. My thoughts were more towards the EV1, although I assume there were many others before that.

        • Resonosity@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          They’re referring to how Thomas Edison created the first electric vehicles back in the 1800s. They might have had a future until Ford introduced assembly lines. Then the rest is history.

          The EV1 was the first commercial development in the US following the World Wars, but even before then you had solar EVs being made for science and eclectic racing before then. Think of those weirdly shaped cars only made for 1 driver that have solar panels covering the entire body of the car.

          Funny thing is that we’re now seeing some commercial (or soon to be commercial) manufacturers add solar panels in the same way. Just look to Hyundai and Aptera.

    • Baphomet_The_Blasphemer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      7 months ago

      I remember an early Saturn EV that was never sold, only leased so GM could maintain ownership of them. Even with a limited range, the drivers all loved them for commuting and running errands, and many tried to purchase them outright, which GM refused. Eventually, GM issued a mandatory recall for all the Saturn EVs, mothballed the project, and then they released the Hummer… made me sick even at the time.

  • umbrella@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    7 months ago

    is that purely because they can’t make them well or is there another reason?

    honestly the japanese EV ive been in felt decent?

    • kalleboo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Japan doesn’t have enough electricity. After Fukushima, they lost most of their nuclear. The country is densely populated, and the parts that aren’t populated are covered in forested mountains, which all makes building the required amount of renewables very difficult. So today and in the future, Japan runs on coal and natural gas. So they make cars that run on hydrogen (which is more efficient to create out of their imported natural gas than burning the gas for electricity) and then sell those abroad greenwashed as “but you can produce hydrogen from green electricity!”

    • Wogi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      7 months ago

      The margins are thinner. There’s almost no resale value. Someone might buy a 60k car and eat the payments for a few years, knowing that they can sell it any time for a decent price.

      Buying a 60k EV is more like setting your money on fire. The car might be fine, great even, but it just won’t hold it’s value.

      • Maggoty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 months ago

        Those are reasons people don’t want to buy EVs, not reasons for companies to sabotage the change over.

        • Crashumbc@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          7 months ago

          Companies give zero fucks about anything but money.

          Completely retooling for EVs is expensive with a lot of risk. And they’ll make less money afterwards…

      • taladar@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        There’s almost no resale value.

        That is not an EV thing, that is a new, rapidly developing technology thing.

      • umbrella@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        why is that? i don’t think lithium batteries degrade THAT fast?

        if the used market had these dirt cheap evs here id probably be considering them. scratch that there is no way to charge them in my country unless you live in a house, or unless you can use regular power outlets hahaha

  • dropped_the_chief@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    7 months ago

    We’re all going to fry in old age. Our children are going to become sterile. Who tf knows what’s going to happen to whatever ppl make it past that.

  • Margot Robbie@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    7 months ago

    The Japanese car companies put all their eggs in the hydrogen basket, despite their early head start in EV with the Toyota Prius and such, and as hydrogen looks to be more and more of a dead end due to transportation and safety concerns, of course they are going to be sandbagging EV adoption to buy time and catch up.

    • UsernameIsTooLon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      7 months ago

      Gotta love the Japanese culture of holding onto tradition until you can’t anymore.

      Gotta remember that Japan was still mostly feudal up until the World Wars. Pretty recent in human history.

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      7 months ago

      The tariffs were explicitly to protect them. To prevent them from having to compete. We’re about to eat a lot of shit.

          • buzz86us@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            7 months ago

            The issue I’m seeing here is that there isn’t anything to protect legacy auto does not make a product that is remotely comparable

  • unreasonabro@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    7 months ago

    Now that we’ve trained the whole world in american-style corporate criminality, we’re gonna pull the rug out from them and reveal ourselves to be the good guys! Right? Right, guys?

    • taladar@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      7 months ago

      Tesla isn’t really a major car company in the transitional sense since they didn’t exist at all as a pre-EV car company.

  • blazera@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    7 months ago

    Blame everyone but your SUV driving selves. The devil made you do it Im sure.

  • StaySquared@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    76
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    I’m only buying Toyota because it didn’t get sucked into the stupid EV craze. They have common sense. The U.S. doesn’t even have the electrical grid to currently manage many parts of the U.S., especially California. How tf are we going to introduce a product that will require electricity, straining the electrical grid further beyond its capacity? It’s fkin nonsense.

    Not to mention… the number of EVs (Teslas) that were having battery failures during the Winter in the midwest. And this last Winter was mild.

    • bamboo@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      32
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      7 months ago

      This is the most fear mongering nonsense I’ve read on Lemmy to date

        • Blaster M@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          7 months ago

          Bruh has never experienced the pain of getting an older carbureted car going in the cold.

        • IzzyScissor@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          7 months ago

          Gasoline is a finite resource, so at some point all gas stations will sell out of gas. Imagine how hilarious it will be when gas cars are stranded at gas stations because there’s nothing to fill them with.

          Lmao Dead.gfy

          • grue@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            Gasoline is a finite resource

            No it isn’t. Crude oil is finite, but gasoline could be synthesized from other carbon and hydrogen sources (up to and including CO2 + H2O + solar power) if you really wanted to.

            • IzzyScissor@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              7 months ago

              Cool.

              The process of synthesizing it is inefficient and expensive. Companies have gone bankrupt trying to make it profitable, so it really doesn’t seem like that’s an answer here, especially when we have cars that don’t require any such fuel already on the roads.

              Sure seems easier.

          • StaySquared@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            7 months ago

            I agree, if the resource is out… there’s nothing you can do but to go to another gas station. However, gasoline in winter weather, even if it’s -30 degrees Fahrenheit, is still usable. You’re still able to pump the fuel into your vehicle. Where as with these charging stations cold temperatures is a nemesis.

            I have no beef with EVs, I just think we’re putting the cart before the horse. Like building a house with no foundation, it’s ludicrous.

    • ThunderWhiskers@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      The only reason Toyota is pushing back against EV is because they are so heavily invested in hydrogen powered vehicles, which isn’t going to happen.

      • StaySquared@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        16
        ·
        7 months ago

        And still proudly producing gas powered vehicles which I will continue to outfit my family with.

    • deafboy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Nobody is going to upgrade the grid, if there is no prospect of increased demand.

      I’ve noticed that media tend to bitch equally about both surplus and shortage of certain commodities. Expensive power? Horrible! Cheap power? Catastrophe! That way the world seems even more depressing than it really is.

      • StaySquared@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        They should be upgrading the grid as the population and demand for electricity increases ahead of time. This is how it works in the tech world. We set the base for the upgrade and then commit to the upgrade with fall back / disaster recovery plan.

        • ChicoSuave@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          Check when the last time an installed utility performed maintenance. Now you want them to turn things off while they put in new hardware? The only thing that will drive a business to make that kind of change is if the money is behind it, which will happen when EVs are much more prevalent.

          • StaySquared@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            7 months ago

            Not from all the profits made by all the people using electricity and paying for electricity? And electrical grid has redundancy. You can take down primary and secondary takes over temporarily.

          • baru@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            7 months ago

            Why would they need to turn anything off? That’s not how they expand capacity in the Netherlands. Why would it be needed?

      • StaySquared@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        18
        ·
        7 months ago

        Cool… I’ll buy an EV when both EV and electrical grid issues have been resolved. Until then… LOL

    • Clanket@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 months ago

      Been driving a VW ID4 for 3 years in Ireland. They’re lovely to drive. Zero battery issues, zero charging issues. The future is electric.