I just realized while cooking that a measuring-cup cup (as measured out as 250mL in a glass measuring cup) is the same amount(s) as one of the actual plastic baking measuring cups that go inside each other like Russian dolls lol

I thought they were different somehow (something something imperial metric yadda yadda yaddda)

Your turn to come clean Lemmings!

**EDIT: to clarify, I mean volumetrically for measuring liquids

  • Koof_on_the_Roof@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    99
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Mum: we’re definitely going the wrong way

    Me: how do you know?

    Mum: because we need to go south and we are currently going north

    Me: how do you know we are going north?

    Mum: because the sun sets in the west

    Me: oh…

  • PrincessTardigrade@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    47
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    Rhode Island isn’t really an island. Like, yeah it’s named after one of its islands, but people who live in the state are on the continental part. I thought the whole state was an island lmao

    • Mechanismatic@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      California also isn’t an island, but it’s named after a fictional island in a Spanish novel, and was once thought to be an island.

      • cheese_greater@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        10 months ago

        I used to think it was named after Calphurnia from Julius Caesar when we read that in class. I literally pronounced her name as “Ka-la-fern-ee-uhh”, fuck

  • RememberTheApollo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    I thought Edinburgh was two different places because of pronunciation.

    I always read it as pronounced like -berg, but there was this other, similar town pronounced -bruh or -boro that people talked about.

    Just one of those place names that didn’t come up often at all, so I never compared them in my head and wondered if “hey, these might be the same place…” It came up and bit me in conversation far too recently where my misunderstanding was worth a laugh among friends.

    That, and I thought we’d elect basically decent (as far as politicians go) people to the presidency that would at least honor tradition and the institution. Boy, was I wrong about that.

    • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      I think everyone should get a pass on pronouncing the names of British places. All pronunciations are equally correct. Don’t like it? Don’t name a place “Michaeleaulourhoroughsbleachhhiffynboroughshire”

    • realaether@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      there was this other, similar town pronounced -bruh or -boro that people talked about.

      You were so close: Edinburgh only got its name after Edward I invaded Scotland in 1296. Before that it (which was then a larger area than the present Edinburgh) had just been called “the Burgh”, which depending on regional variation would have been pronounced either “burg” or “boro”. “Edinburgh” referred to a smaller area within the Burgh that the king’s guards would patrol more severely due to the perceived increased risk of rebellion due to higher population density.

      (/joke)

  • netburnr@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    10 months ago

    Having a tooth pulled wouldn’t be that expensive.

    Now I see why Noone in America goes to the dentist

  • bl4ckblooc@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    10 months ago

    They are different though! The glass measuring cup is for liquid and the ones that nestle into each other are for dry ingredients. You need to fill the little ‘1 cup’ dry measuring cup to the brim with ingredients to get an accurate measurement, which is pretty much impossible with the glass wet measuring cups.

    When you are measuring dry ingredients, you can fill the same cup with more flour or whatever depending on how you fill it as well, but with liquid it’s, well, fluid.

    So, you can measure wet ingredients in the dry ingredients cup, but not the other way around.

    • Transient Punk@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      10 months ago

      You shouldn’t use measuring cups of any sort for dry ingredients. Use a scale. And if the recipe gives volumetric measurements instead of weight, you should convert them to weight first. You’ll find your baking/cooking will become more consistent as a result.

      • TK420@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        10 months ago

        It blows my mind that the OP was wrong and real answer to OP was not a reply, but a reply to a reply, ugh.

        • cheese_greater@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          It wasn’t dry stuff, is was water and milk for cooking. It was fine :) Its a good guideline tho re:consistency and definitely for baking/dry ingredients.

          I also only eat to live, I don’t have a super sensitive palate so its 99% the time just as well

          • Transient Punk@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            If you have to eat to live, you may as learn to make it taste as good as you can. You may as well derive as much enjoyment as you can from the things you have to do anyway.

            • cheese_greater@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              10 months ago

              Meh, I’d rather it be little more than passable, so its not addictive and I don’t get fat and also corralled into cooking for anybody else unless I want to ;)

              • Transient Punk@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                10 months ago

                Yup, you’re right. I wouldn’t want to end up fat like Gordon Ramsay either.

                In case anyone wants to see the unedited retorts from this chucklefuck:

      • bl4ckblooc@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        10 months ago

        You should use a scale, but most kitchens don’t have a scale in them. I wasn’t trying to make things more difficult with my reply.

        • Mr_Blott@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          Every single kitchen I’ve ever been in had scales in it wtf

          Well apart from that junkie bastard I met but he probably sold them for crack

          • bl4ckblooc@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            Then you live in a fantasy lane and need to realize that the majority of the world doesn’t live in the same world as you. Have you also never seen a check engine light in a car?

              • bl4ckblooc@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                10 months ago

                ….you do realize that they are still called ‘measuring cups’ in other countries right? They aren’t called ‘measuring 250 grams’.

                • Boxtifer@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  Solids weigh different amounts. You are talking about ml here. This is a good example of why it isn’t ideal.

      • Mr_Blott@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        I would happily pay for a browser add-on that blocked American recipes.

        Who the fuck uses cups to measure, outside of a nursery? 😂

      • Telodzrum@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        10 months ago

        It doesn’t matter for a lot of things. Flour is compressible, but sugar isn’t for example.

        • Transient Punk@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          Sugar, like salt, is crystalline, and may not be compressible, but the crystal sizes do vary.

          10 grams of rock salt will be the same as 10 grams of fine sea salt.

          1 cup of rock salt =/= 1 cup of fine sea salt.

          Use a scale. Always.

          • Telodzrum@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            10 months ago

            No, sorry but it’s just not important. First, granulated sugar and table salt are both uniform at the macro scale and the individual structure of each crystal is immaterial to measurement at these scales. Secondly, your kitchen scale is neither accurate nor precise enough for it to matter for anything but the most compressible solids.

            • Transient Punk@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              10 months ago

              Secondly, your kitchen scale is neither accurate nor precise enough for it to matter for anything but the most compressible solids.

              Since you don’t accept the abstract argument, how about a concrete one.

              This is a pizza dough recipe I make often,

              Despite volumetric measurements being offered, there is no way to consistently get a 1/3 of a 1/4 of a teaspoon. But, I am able to get 0.3 grams consistently with a scale.

              • Telodzrum@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                10
                ·
                10 months ago

                But, I am able to get 0.3 grams consistently with a scale.

                You are consistently able to get your scale to read 0.3 grams. That is not the same as being able to consistently get 0.3 grams or have the same mass of a substance read out at 0.3 grams.

                People should be required to do more lab work before just posting bullshit online.

                • papalonian@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  Why are you declaring the inaccuracy of their scale as if it’s fact? You don’t even know what kind of scale they’re using and you end your comment with some grade-A “everyone is dumb except for me” crap like you somehow shut down their entire argument.

                  Not to mention how easy it is to test what you’re arguing about. I literally just did this a few days ago with my roommate who was trying to bake some brownies. 3 scoops of flour placed on a scale resulted in 3 different readings that had a range of ~15g. I don’t care how inaccurate you’re going to claim my scale is, that’s a very large discrepancy.

        • Transient Punk@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          10 months ago

          The real hack comes when you realize you can weigh everything, so you never have to clean measuring devices ever again.

          When I make cookies, I use a scale, and bake them on parchment paper. As a result, I only have to clean a bowl, and a spoon (and barely the baking sheet).

      • s_s@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Measuring dry ingredients by volume is about as accurate as most kitchen scales, lol.

        • Transient Punk@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          I appreciate you jumping to conclusions about my intelligence. Really points to the good faith of your comment. But despite your bad faith:

          Those conversions are readily available on Google. The point is not to have an exactly accurate conversion from volume to mass, but to have a consistent starting point to use from that point on. If you know how much of each ingredient was added by weight the last time you made something, it is easy to update ingredient amounts to make the recipe perfect.

          I know that’s a pretty simple concept, but I spelled it out for you since you don’t inspire much confidence in your critical thinking skills, ass.

            • papalonian@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              It’s always funny when people just go “haha wooow your so wrong lol… geez wow ur wrong lol” instead of actually responding to a comment.

              This guy said nothing rude, nothing controversial, just gave some cooking/ baking advice.

              You see they mistakenly said weight rather than mass (something that a ton of people do, all the time, while being entirely aware of the difference between the two) and tried to show off how smart you were by being a total dick for no reason.

              Then when the person actually responds to your comment, you try to puff your chest online one last time before shutting the fuck up and abandoning thread before you can make yourself look more of a semantics-jerking twit. Love it, keep up the energy king.

        • Feathercrown@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          10 months ago

          someone that confuses weight and mass

          What, do you expect him to make his next batch of cookies on the moon?

          • papalonian@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            10 months ago

            I bet when filling out medical forms they cross out “weight” and write a paragraph explaining to their medical professionals the difference between mass and weight.

    • Donebrach@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      It’s still the same volume. Saying they are different is misleading. They just have different use cases.

      • bl4ckblooc@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        I didn’t say the volume was different? I said the containers are different making it more difficult to get the proper volume of dry goods. You can’t flatten off 1 cup of flour that’s measured in a 2 cup measuring cup.

        • Donebrach@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          OP thought they were different as in different volumes, and then came to understand their mistake. you then came in to proclaim that they are different, then described how certain containers are harder to measure certain materials. Regardless of ease of use, a cup is a cup is a cup, so long is the “cup” in question is 8 oz of volume. Yes, some measurement tools have a different physical shape and may be more difficult to use for certain tasks, but that was not the “difference” being misidentified.

          Also, you absolutely could use a glass measuring cup for flour, just tamp it down and go slowly, but that’d be stupid. Regardless, this is why using weight measurements for baking is vastly superior to using volume.

  • Shou@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    That social skill and practical skills are far more valuable than theory.

    • SatanicNotMessianic@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      10 months ago

      Unless you’re really, really good at theory. See Von Neumann, Murray Gell-Mann, John Nash, and many others. It really goes for anyone who’s talented significantly above their peers in tech, the arts, sports…

      The problem is that it scales with talent, so someone who’s modestly brilliant will get less leeway than a Nobel (or EGOT) level talent, and talent seems to scale non-linearly.

    • Acamon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      Wait, you are saying that’s something you believed but learned was wrong. You now believe that theory is more valuable than social & practical skills? Or the other way round?

      • Shou@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        I used to believe that knowledge was the most valuable. I now know it isn’t and that other stuff such as social skills are much more important.

        • Acamon@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          Ah, that makes more sense. I think the way op’s question is worded makes reading a lot of the answers here confusing.

  • jpreston2005@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Well those wires that hold telephone poles and other such tall objects in position? those aren’t called “guide-wires.”

    They’re called “Guy wires.”

    I think that’s pretty dumb of everyone else tho

    • cheese_greater@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Haha, that sounds like more of a BoneAppleTea or Rickyism but funny nontheless ;) Its not even objectively unreasonable, so props smartypants

    • cheese_greater@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      How did they ever show receipts or evidence of the whole WMD thing to begin with? Or is it just 9eleben was a hell of drug?

      • ikidd@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        That was back when people took the administration at their word. Mah terrism held a lot of pull immediately after 911. Plus you had useful idiots like Judith Miller out there trumpeting the narrative.

        But the experience cured me of that disease. And then Snowden happened to finish the job.

  • spittingimage@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Every time I drive into the city centre I pass a sign for the Eastport exit. You never hear about Eastport on the news and I figured it must be the most boring part of the city - until I finally realised it was the sign for the East motorway exit to reach the sea port. 😟

  • s_s@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Honest question, have you ever measured anything for cooking?

    You really can’t measure solids in the liquid cup and you can’t really measure liquids in the solid cups.