I ordered 4 pairs of shoes online. I received 3, 1 if which was damaged.

A few days later I called to complaint about the missing shoe and the damaged shoe. They tell me nothing they can do about the damaged shoe, but will pay me back for the undelivered shoe and that they knew already as the stock had actually run out and the return was already in process.

The transaction went through today, I received payment for all 4 shoes…

So basically I got 2 shoes plus a damaged shoe for free

  • pinball_wizard@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    20 hours ago

    I think about what I would want, if our roles were reversed.

    If I was being paid minimum wage to toss shoes in a box and ship them to you, and I made this mistake in your favor, I would prefer that you enjoy it and don’t inform my employer of my error.

    If I’m a sole owner, I’m probably happy if you let me know about the error, but I’m probably most concerned that you give me 5 stars wherever you are able. (And I hope that you consider some free shoes 5 stars worthy, but maybe leave off the bit about my being kind of shit at logistics.)

    Either way, in your shoes, I probably leave a review
    “5/5 great shoes and service for the price I paid.”

  • Olgratin_Magmatoe@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    If it’s a mom and pop store, then the right thing to do is notify them.

    If it’s a corporation, fuck their soulless bullshit.

    • 0_o7@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      20 hours ago

      A mom and pop store are less likely to send a damaged piece. They actually care about their customers.

  • Perspectivist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 day ago

    From a purely moral standpoint it seems rather obvious that the right thing to do is to contact them and let them know about the mistake. I’m quite literally unable to come up with an opposing argument.

    • ILoveUnions@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      17 hours ago

      An easy opposing argument would be if they’ve done wage theft. Which near every large company has. Or if they’ve used unethical business practices (ditto)

      • Perspectivist@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        16 hours ago

        You’re shifting the question from “what’s the right thing to do?” to “does this company deserve honesty?” - which isn’t a counterargument, it’s a dodge. The idea that the company probably committed wage theft is pure speculation, and even if true, it wouldn’t justify dishonesty in return. That’s moral relativism, not ethics. The question here is simple: do you knowingly keep money that isn’t yours? Everything else is just rationalizing what one already wants to do.

        • ILoveUnions@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          16 hours ago

          I’m responding to you asking for a purely moral stance, with a possible counter argument. I’m not suggesting to take without checking, I’m suggesting check and it’s very likely they have.

          , it wouldn’t justify dishonesty in return

          It would justify not going out of your way to return money to them.

          That’s moral relativism, not ethics

          There’s no such thing as morals or ethics that are not relative. Stating that has no meaning. When discussing morals, you must be willing to debate the morals foundations themselves. Are you?

          • Perspectivist@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            14 hours ago

            It would justify not going out of your way to return money to them.

            I disagree. A moral universalist view would hold that taking what isn’t yours is wrong, full stop. You can argue there are degrees to it - that stealing from a cancer patient causes more harm than stealing from a megacorporation - but something being less bad than the alternative still doesn’t make it good or right. From a purely moral standpoint, the right thing to do is to let them know they overpaid. Treat others as you’d want to be treated yourself.

  • my_hat_stinks@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    2 days ago

    On your end there’s not much to consider here. You can let them know they refunded the entire order, chances are they’ll just write it off. If they ask you to send it back it should be entirely at their expense, do not pay to send it back.

    On their end there’s more going on. It sounds like they charged you for an item they knowingly did not ship then claimed the refund was already in progress when you complained. They also gave you a damaged item and claimed to be unable to refund that, which in most developed countries would be a breach of consumer regulations. This sounds an awful lot like that company is attempting to scam people.

  • yesman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    Treat capitalists as you find them. Forget morality. What is advantageous and legal is automatically good. What is advantageous and illegal is a cost/benefit calculation.

  • Hegar@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    If the seller has enough capital for a customer service phone line, you have no ethical duty to let them know about two pairs of shoes.

    The manufacturing cost of two pairs is negligible - there’s no way it can meaningfully affect them at all. Whereas an extra 4 pairs worth of retail price could meaningfully affect you. Even if you only spend it on yourself, you create more happiness in the world by not saying anything.

    If you feel guilty or really don’t need the money, you can always treat a loved one, spend it on fair trade or independently made shoes or clothes, or find an anti-sweat-shop group to donate to.

    • yermaw@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      24 hours ago

      Spot on. If its some individual on Etsy having a go, do the right thing. If its an international corporation fuck em. They can misplace thousands before they even notice.

  • SnokenKeekaGuard@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    2 days ago

    I could contact them and pay them, for 2 or 3 shoes.

    I could forget about it.

    I could donate the cost of 2 shoes somewhere I want. Theres a charity here that helps women victim of domestic abuse, particularly acid attacks. Or somewhere else.

  • Libb@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 day ago

    Contact them to at least let them know about the error regarding the refund. If they are not morons, they should let you keep the money. And if they ask you to send the money back, at the very least you will know you have done the right thing.

  • Paragone@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Depends on YOUR relationship with your Eternity/karma/sow-reap-Law:

    How would you want others to treat you, were your places reversed?

    That’s what you need to do, to be upright in your own soul.

    _ /\ _

    • Perspectivist@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Thanks for being the only person making sense in this thread. This is such a depressing group of people to hang with sometimes…

  • ace_garp@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    They may be trying to avoid the situation where you leave a negative review, which would cost them more than the cost of the shoes.

  • zxqwas@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 days ago

    If they notice the poor guy processing your order will probably be yelled at, maybe fired.