Every time I hear someone say ‘eh’ in a questioning tone or to mean ‘um actually’ I lose my shit. Or even just to play something down.

Like I literally come to hate the person instantly. Its a very strong feeling on a very small sound.

Instant downvotes if I see it on Lemmy too. HATE IT.

How about all y’all?

    • 1984@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Ive noticed that so many people are bothered by minor things in life.

      That being said, I hate the “lets circle back to that”. :)

  • Squirliss@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    5 hours ago

    “What I think she was trying to say is that- 🤓☝️” Stop trying to put words in my mouth or speak on my behalf when I am right here to put my point across to everyone.

    That followed by those public event speakers that brush off the first round of goodmornings and then say “SAy iT lOuDeR! wHeRes yOuR eNeRgY! DIdNt yOu aLl eAt bReAkfAst?! 🤪” Idk what it is about hearing this sentence early in the morning that inspires so much hatred in me. You could have the most riveting, inspiring and thought provoking presentation in the world and have done lots of commendable deeds but if that string of words exits mouth before showing all of it, I automatically dislike you and whatever you have to say next.

    • SnokenKeekaGuard@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 hours ago

      I think what youre trying to say is that you want to communicate your own ideas in the way you wish to and not funneled through another mind.

      Also yes anyone in public speaking wanting more of a response is annoying.

  • sicarius@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    5 hours ago

    “It is what it is” when describing a bad situation.
    No, that’s defeatist as hell, it will be whatever it will be when I’ve given it everything I can to make it better.

    • Nuggsy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      I have come to dislike this saying quite a lot. I have heard friends, family, the general populace utter this saying so often for the last 4-5 years It’s become grating to hear.

  • fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    5 hours ago

    When talking politics:

    “It’s plain as day” “Common sense” “I don’t know about that” “We all know” “It’s just natural” “Normal” “Everybody (verbs) (x)”

    Like that kind of stuff irks me in normal conversations but when we are talking about something that is part of common debate, obviously it’s fucking not already known “common sense”, and dismissing evidence that clearly contradicted it by saying “I don’t about that” or similar just sends me.

    It’s a problem with trolls, strangers, and even loved ones for me. It’s just wild

  • jaycifer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    7 hours ago

    “Most people think ___.” No, unless you’re citing a statistic or roughly quantifying how many anecdotes you’ve heard agreeing with you to support that statement (both of which rarely happen), that’s just your opinion wrapped up in language to avoid actually justifying it.

    Additionally, even if most people think something, I don’t care what most people think. In my experience what most people think vs what the best thing to think is are often not aligned.

  • RBWells@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    In writing: “A Masterclass in X” to describe some sort of exemplary behavior. Hate hate hate seeing it.

    I’m more forgiving with spoken language, but agree with the use of “literally” to mean “figuratively”, it bothers me.

    And in niche hairstyling lingo I hate when people use the word “micro-plopping” to describe scrunching or blotting with a cloth, because that technique precedes the word by at least 25 years, it wasn’t invented recently and didn’t need a new word. Plopping is tying your wet hair up in a cloth in a accordioned arrangement for awhile, and scrunching is just scrunching. What they are describing is better explained by saying they blotted with a cloth and/or scrunched with a cloth.

  • ScotinDub@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    8 hours ago

    I’ve seen/heard a few Americans (old and young) saying something like “it has been a minute” to indicate “it has been a long time”. What the hell is that? How did that start? Please someone enlighten me

    • Blisterexe@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      It’s just a euphemism, it’s a sentence made funny by how much it understates the reality of the situation

    • JcbAzPx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      That one’s been around long enough I doubt anyone really knows its origin. It does follow a pattern of using the minute to describe various amounts of time.

      For instance, a ‘New York minute’ means extremely quickly and a ‘hot minute’ is a long time, but much less than just ‘it’s been a minute’.

  • xia@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    9 hours ago

    “to make a long story short” - especially when used multiple times in one story and/or as a mindless audiospace filler to hold control of the conversation while assembling more thoughts/words… without knowing both the long and short version it literally adds nothing to the communication, it literally makes the story longer every time you use it (wasting my time), it’s probably the longest socially acceptable way to say that (one could just say: “in short”), and it’s got just enough word-scramble verbal complexity to occupy the higher order English parsing logic.

  • 5too@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    10 hours ago

    “Literally” meaning figuratively. I’m fine with most words changing with use; but we need that word! It’s how you indicate you’re not exaggerating or speaking dramatically! Especially these days, that clarification is important!

    I’m also seeing a lot of corporate buzzwords in job descriptions. I get that these are essentially technical terms, but they’re not being used for accuracy or clarity here. You just don’t like how short your description is.

    • JcbAzPx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 hours ago

      I’ve taken to using ‘actually literally’ to indicate I’m not being literally figurative. It’s a losing battle, though. Anything we come up with to mean being literal will become a dramatic enhancer eventually.

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Eh, to make a long story short, corpos have been using jargon and buzzwords in job descriptions, literally forever. 🤪

  • remon@ani.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    10 hours ago

    You “hold the fort”. It’s a military position.

    Only a fort molester would “hold down” the fort.

    • stinky@redlemmy.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      9 hours ago

      wait what

      a) can forts be molested b) does holding something down meaning it’s being molested? think paper weights c)

      • remon@ani.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        9 hours ago

        a) can forts be molested b) does holding something down meaning it’s being molested?

        I don’t know, but that’s what I think off when someone says “hold down the fort”.

        think paper weights c)

        And if the expression was “hold down the bouncy castle” that would make a lot more sense. Not as an expression … but on a windy day at least.

  • 1984@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    13 hours ago

    I dont let my emotions control me like that, but I know what you mean. :)

    • balance8873@lemmy.myserv.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      9 hours ago

      So you “know what op means” about hating a specific phrase, but you personally don’t have emotions? If you don’t have emotions how can you know what op means?

      • Lemminary@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Those two are unrelated ideas, calm down. You can dislike a phrase and still don’t let it get to you. That’s totally relatable.

        Also, this is your second comment on this account and it’s just as negative as your first. What’s up with that? This isn’t Reddit.

        • balance8873@lemmy.myserv.one
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          3 hours ago

          I’m very calm, you seem to be the one letting your emotions control you here.

          Is lemmy about praising people for making pointless, self aggrandizing claims that don’t contribute to the conversation? Cause that’s what the post I was responding to was. “Ha I’m better than all of you and I have no intention of contributing because I’m better than all of you”. That’s unkind.

          • Lemminary@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 hours ago

            Is your entire point to spew nonsense, confuse people for others, and be “unkind” while contributing nothing yourself other than incendiary bullshit? Aka, be a troll? Not the place for you.

            • balance8873@lemmy.myserv.one
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              3 hours ago

              Oh hey you’re right, you are two separate people. Fixed the text of the post. I do wish this app made people more visually distinct. It’s not 1990. Well either way you seem to be well aware I was referring to the other person’s comment, so we should be good to go.

          • 1984@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            7 hours ago

            Your reddit history seems to have made you read things into the post that wasnt there…

            Maybe some time away from social media is a good idea.

    • stinky@redlemmy.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 hours ago

      You hate things too friendo. You get angry. You make bad decisions because of it. Your emotions cause you to hurt people. This is a normal part of being human. No one “lets” their emotions control them; they are controlled by them no matter what.

      The fact that you don’t apologize afterwards doesn’t mean you weren’t wrong. It means you’re a jerk.

  • kubok@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    17 hours ago

    “Give something 110%”

    Fuck no! 100% is the max. Even that is often too much to ask. Also, what’s in it for me? Your appreciation huh? Well fuck you.

    “I have a challenge for you”.

    No you don’t. You have a problem and want to make it mine. Piss off.

    • HubertManne@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 hours ago

      I am going through peoples replies sorta laughing to myself but what you have is the closest thing to something that irritates me. honestly 110 is like all the think out of the box bussiness speak to actualize externalities and such.

  • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Oh god; where to start?

    • ‘literally’. It’s best when using the Essex pronunciation of ‘litchally’ for maximum cringey delivery.
    • ‘the ask’. Because ‘request’ or ‘question’ is too hard to say around the pablum.
    • ‘the spend’. Off the car lot, it sounds super-douchey.
    • ‘action this’. Why decide on a verb like ‘do’ or ‘complete’ or ‘revisit’ or ‘prioritize’?
    • ‘begs the question’. Chances are, it really doesn’t. And using that wrongly makes you sound like Mike Tyson saying ‘utilize’

    And now there’s one more:

    • ‘utilize’; or, really, anyone using stilted ‘formal’ phrasing instead of plain English. You don’t sound posh, but you do sound like you’re three kids in a trenchcoat trying to fake being an adult so you don’t get booted from the R-rated movie.
    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 hours ago

      ‘action this’. Why decide on a verb like ‘do’ or ‘complete’ or ‘revisit’ or ‘prioritize’?

      FWIW, ive been questioning our use of a security tool and get blank stares when I say “it doesn’t change anything”. Yet somehow they understand “it generates great data but our process doesn’t action anything”