• RageAgainstTheRich@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      10 hours ago

      I have noticed people have changed the way they type since around 2016, when trump became president. The amount of people putting “Sad.” Behind a sentence is mindblowing. He gave so many people severe brainworms.

      • BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Using caps for emphasis in places where formatting options don’t exist is a practice as old as the internet. I remember doing it in the usenet days.

        • derek@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          33 minutes ago

          It’s a practice at least as old as type itself. It seems the attention Trump garnered, and the highlighting of his stereotypical Boomer typing, have merged the two in some people’s minds.

          We’re at a unique crossroad where Gen X and Y grew up with their grandparents mostly refusing to use cell phones and their parents mostly fumbling with them. Now Gen Z and “Alpha” are growing up with grandparents who have mostly been shamed into acceptable text etiquette, and parents who are mostly as tech savvy as the next parent and who were there when the deep magic was written (so to speak).

          Mango Mussolini’s narcissism is as pervasive as his parasitism so it’s no wonder the lecherous rapist’s sins against modern digital convention survived along with him. Some spin that as brilliant tactics but I’m not so sure. I’d wager it’s a coincidence he leaned into because it garnered attention.

          Most of those now driving online discourse hadn’t had the same exposure to that style of texting prior to the 2016 US Presidential election cycle as preceding generations. So it seems novel to them. It’s history and perspective bring formed in real time.

        • bassomitron@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 hours ago

          I think it’s still mostly used ironically. Though, it’s hard to know anymore. I know it is among my social circles, at least.

      • HugeNerd@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 hours ago

        He gave so many people severe brainworms.

        Luckily not you though. That Ivermectin helped!

    • Zink@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      10 hours ago

      With a single word in caps like that, I read it as yelling the word loudly.

      The way it’s used here, by a PR conscious intermediary, it comes across more like bitter sarcasm. Like he would not let them release the statement on his behalf unless they yelled Facebook’s name when calling them out. It is similar to when a child tells their sibling they aren’t allowed to do something, but they say it loudly enough so that everybody understands the parent in the next room hears it too.

      Edit to clarify: It is an awesome move to call them out, especially to people who blindly just use Meta’s stuff. I read my own comment and worried it would sound like I was calling the Facebook call-out childish itself. It is not. It is a very good thing to fight for a better world, especially when you have the fame or resources that give you a louder voice.

    • Pxtl@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 hours ago

      The way people turned up their nose at the Fediverse when the Muskening happened to Twitter was heartbreaking. I knew social media was an addiction but when you find out your dealer is an absolute monster how do you not go looking for a new supplier?

      But they all discarded Mastodon et al as cringe and teduoust. Like, the way even trans women influencers stayed on Twitter blew my mind. When bluesky got off the ground there was finally some migration, but not enough.

      It really showed me how many of the “anti-capitalist” and the “anarchism” and “mutual aid” people were all just talk. The mutual-aid volunteer-based platform exists and you stuck with the fascist because it was easy and you’re too cool for the nerd shit.

    • floofloof@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      92
      ·
      edit-2
      14 hours ago

      He took a principled stance when he left Spotify too, after they paid hundreds of millions for Joe Rogan’s podcast.

      Edit: Disappointingly, it turns out he went back to Spotify after a couple of years.

      • ArgentRaven@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        60
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        13 hours ago

        I’m pretty sure his label put his stuff back on there, despite his wishes. I seen to remember a need article at the time describing his reaction as “disappointed”. Not all of his stuff is back on there, but I guess the stuff he didn’t have full control over is.

        Personally, I don’t listen to Joe Rogan, but I do listen to Neil Young. And Spotify is the way I typically listen to anything since they killed the SD Card on most mobile phones. So it hurt me, and I assume it hurts anyone who would want to listen to both and only gets the option of Joe Rogan. So I think having access to media is better, but I’m not the artist and I get taking a moral stance.

        • floofloof@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          23
          ·
          13 hours ago

          I think the aim is to get people to switch to a more ethical streaming service, if they want to stream music. Spotify isn’t the only option.

          • ArgentRaven@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            9 hours ago

            I tried tidal about two years ago and they had even less of what I listen to than Spotify. But maybe I should check in again and see what’s different, because nothing stays the same for long.

            • Ibuthyr@lemmy.wtf
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              24 minutes ago

              If you don’t want to support an American company, you could also try Qobuz.

            • Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              10 hours ago

              Yeah check again. It’s pretty comprehensive now and it has not yet been littered with AI songs. Only issue I have is sometimes songs in my Playlist will no longer be licensed with them and can’t play anymore which is frustrating but rare. Aufio quality is better than Spotify.

    • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      9 hours ago

      I almost didn’t get your joke there, good one.

      Also, if you’re into low/no budget films, Hooker With a Heart of Gold is a great one, but it’s like 15-20 years old and it shows.

  • Ganbat@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    14 hours ago

    On the one hand, that’s good, but on the other hand, Meta crossed my line over eight years ago, and I’m woefully disappointed that he was using it until this point.

    • Mitch Effendi (ميتش أفندي)@piefed.mitch.science
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      13 hours ago

      I guess, but you will lead a lonely life if you can’t find common struggle with people in different scenarios than our own. We can easily lose our soul with these endless purity tests — for some reason, Leftists, progressives, and liberals seem to be constantly on the lookout for the next Jesus Christ, who will just simply energize voters by consequence of, I dunno, magic or some shit.

      Neil Young is still a working musician who needs to get his face and music in front of as wide and as general of an audience as possible — why wouldn’t they be where people are? That’s what makes this stand so important. Homie needs Facebook and Insta and still said no.

      • FarraigePlaisteaċ@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        13 hours ago

        I think that attitude is a trap, and what got us into this mess in the first place. If more people did what Young did, these platforms wouldn’t have the power (which we give them) to unleash as much harm on the world. Your suggestion implies that we should all wait for others to move first. That’s the definition of paralysis.

        And with a net worth the size of Young’s, it’s simply not true to say he “needs” to use those platforms, except in the more privileged misuse of the word. They’re luxury items for him.

  • JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    5 hours ago

    Well I hope Neil Young will remember: Zuckerberg don’t want him around, anyhow.

  • Komodo Rodeo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    13 hours ago

    A musician/celebrity with high moral standards and personal integrity, imagine that, huh?