I spent half that time in Critical Care (much of that on a ventilator, a small amount sedated), and most of the rest in a specialist neuro-rehab unit. I would have died otherwise.

Fortunately it cost me nothing - Thank Bevan for the NHS - but if I were in the US I imagine I would be financially crippled!

  • Lord Wiggle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    12 hours ago

    I’m not from the US, but I’ve heard someone from there explain the system.

    When you go to hospital, and get a bill of $250.000 your insurance company will cover let say $50.000. You will get a bill for $1.200 and the rest will be declared by the hospital to their insurance company as damages.

    It’s super weird, I still don’t get it but apparently this is how it works in most cases, or as I’m told.

  • DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Depends.

    My dad went in the hospital for like probably 3 months, and afiak, their small bussiness is still running. They have insurance.

    For everyone else who don’t have insurance and don’t have any assets, just refuse to pay the bills, like what are they gonna do? Confiscate your organs? (Inb4 they pass the “USA Repossess Organs Act”)

  • fluxion@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    22 hours ago

    All the screwed. And now as of this month medical debt will be part of your credit reports, so good luck on getting a home loan or job

    • Technoworcester@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Why on earth would debt effect getting a job? My employer doesn’t know my credit rating.

      Mortgage and loans I understand but not the job bit.

        • Technoworcester@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          12 hours ago

          That’s bonkers. My employer has No reason to know my credit rating and unless I’m working in some kind of ‘protected’ industry not sure why I would require a background check.

          • Darleys_Brew@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            6 hours ago

            I’m speculating here, and don’t think for a second I’m in favour of this, but probably so your employer knows how desperate you are for a job and therefore how much they can push you.

  • booly@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    1 day ago

    The average cost of a hospital stay in a U.S. hospital is about $3,000 per day, but it varies significantly by location. So long stays like yours might cost between $250,000 and $500,000.

    If your insurance covers it (and about 92% of Americans have health insurance), you’d be looking at your annual out of pocket max, which the law caps at $18,000 for family plans or $9,000 for individual plans, but which most people on employer sponsored plans (around 60% of Americans) have out of pocket maxes around $4,000 to $5,000. Source

    So for most Americans, your hospital stay would’ve probably cost the individual patient about $5,000. Insurance would’ve paid another $350,000.

    But for some Americans, they’d be looking at a $360,000 bill and then would just file bankruptcy, start over with close to a net worth of zero, at least for non-exempt assets (people generally get to keep their homes, cars, and retirement accounts in bankruptcy so it won’t actually be starting from zero if you’re well into a middle age in the middle class).

    Or worse, the hospital would realize they’re not getting paid, and then would find a reason to kick you out as soon as you’re stabilized. They have to keep you alive even when you can’t pay, but don’t have to treat you beyond that for free.

    • whotookkarl@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Agree 100% except one thing to be a little picky, the insurance doesn’t pay the full 350k like ever, that’s the list price they have negotiated prices with the hospital that differ, and if your ask the hospital bursar/collections you can get a cash price that’s usual less as well.

    • slate@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 day ago

      And if you do have insurance and get a bill over a few thousand, there are pretty good odds insurance will deny paying for it and drag you through many levels of confusing and auto-denied appeals over the course of 6+ months! Even if your procedure is clearly covered in your summary plan description or required by law.

    • AlexLost@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      With the recent changes to the medical insurance landscape in America, and thousands upon thousands of people losing their jobs due to various factors, your 90% figure is pretty generous. Add in the fact that most insurance is tied directly into employment, Americans have much less options than the rest of the free world, unless you are filthy rich.

  • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    If you spent 4 months in a U.S. hospital and didn’t die, you would spend the rest of your life wishing you did.

  • RBWells@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    24 hours ago

    More likely you just would not have been kept in hospital four months here. Somehow we have the combination of highest cost and also cost-cutting schemes.

    To answer your question - $18,000 I guess, if I got lucky and the insurance worked correctly. That’s the alleged max out of pocket for the insurance I pay for at work.

  • HubertManne@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    102
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    You would have lost your job and likely be on medicaid and disability and it would be very unclear if you have or lost your house and possessions but keeping hold of them moving forward would be almost impossible unless you could find a new job which is also highly unlikely.

    • Frozengyro@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      2 days ago

      Also, at some point you couldn’t afford care anymore. So you would have stopped treatment and died.

      • HubertManne@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        2 days ago

        maybe. the us is odd in that if you literally cannot walk out on your own they usually keep you while the bills rack up.

    • Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      Hm, would you though. There is short and long term disability. Some states require some amount of it. And salary type jobs often include more of it. You may get replaced after a bit, but you technically would still be employed until after. That might mean you would have to pay the insurance premiums out of pocket, but assuming you could afford to, that would be well worth it.

      Not saying that is how it “should” be though. Just that there is probably more nuance.

      • HubertManne@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Im talking about the concept of insurance in general. Im just comparing it. You pay more to handle and event that you can’t economically handle at the time. Like losing your house to a fire. Im just saying the value is worth the cost much like generally these things are.

  • selkiesidhe@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    That is bankruptcy, pure and simple. There’s no way you’d financially recover from a four month stint in the hospital.

    People have literally unalived themselves here over hospital bills like that.

    Thank God you weren’t in a shit hole country, like the US.

    • gilgameth@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      46
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      This is not YouTube, don’t make it so. You can -and in my opinion, should- say suicide, kill, etc.

      • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        23 hours ago

        So much of this

        I don’t understand the need to find alternative words for words we already have. What, in 20 years we need to find alternative words again because the next generation feels insulted by the words this generation came up with?

        Just use the words. Suicide. It is what it is. Its ugly, it’s sad, it shouldn’t be needed, but here we are. Don’t make it more palatable by censoring yourself

          • exasperation@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            1 day ago

            I think you’ve hit perfectly why I don’t like the “unalive” and related euphemisms for death. Death, especially violent death, is a big fucking deal, and trying to obscure that impact behind vague or even cutesy words, makes it seem mundane or routine and accessible.

          • stringere@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            As someone who just last week attended a wake for the suicide of an 11 year old who lived two houses down from us and was one of my child’s friends :thank you for saying that.

            • CalipherJones@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              22 hours ago

              Crazy that suicide even crosses the mind of an 11 year old, let alone them actually going through with it.

          • P00ptart@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            This is a result of communication being penned in by social media rules. We largely can’t even discuss this serious topic on an open level so unfortunately cutesy nicknames are required when talking about serious issues these days.

    • andrewta@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Or get insurance and then the bill is significantly smaller. The much smaller amount can be put on a payment plan if needed or even haggled down to something you can pay.

  • LilB0kChoy@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    58
    ·
    2 days ago

    This is too hard to answer because of the number of variables at play like, do you have insurance, does your condition/issue qualify you for Medicare, does your job offer disability leave, are you FMLA eligible, do you meet requirements for SSA disability etc.

    Anecdotally, in 2017 I spent two non-consecutive months in the hospital. The first visit I came in through the ER, ended up in the ICU intubated and worked my way through each section as I got better.

    My second stay I skipped the ICU but had a transplant halfway through. I also was on dialysis for the ~6 months in between.

    Dialysis was billed at $7k a visit, roughly $500k in total. The transplant surgery alone was ~$750k. The hospital stays came to about $5k a day on average for roughly $300k in total.

    So straight billed amount I was somewhere in the $1.5-$1.7 million range.

      • LilB0kChoy@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        I am doing better though it’s looking like I’ll need another transplant at some point.

        Fortunately, I had good insurance through work and because I ended up in renal failure that makes you automatically eligible for Medicare (one good thing Nixon did). Also, the billed amount gets discounted based on whatever deal your particular insurance has with the provider, so billed amount ≠ paid amount. Unless you’re uninsured.

        I did ended up going through bankruptcy anyway but that had more to do with my choices and lifestyle leading up to all of this. It did wipe out any portion of that bill that would have been my responsibility though

          • LilB0kChoy@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            4 hours ago

            As an alcoholic whose life was barely under control.

            The long story short version is that, over 10ish years I drank myself almost to death, ended up hospitalized with liver and kidney failure, got discharged and went through treatment and the ended back in the hospital in pretty serious need (so they told me) of a transplant.

            Fortunately for me I got listed and was transplanted 5 days later. After that I realized I was given a second chance most people don’t get and worked to turn my life around.

            I’m now 8 years sober, good credit, married with a house, 2 dogs, 2 cats and I wake up every day grateful to have this extra time.

    • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      you will also be on immunosuppresants long term, because organ transplants too. only some of those medicines are probably cheap.

      • LilB0kChoy@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 day ago

        Yes, and they are not cheap. I typically hit my insurance deductible by the end of February each year.

        I’m the kind of person insurance companies hate because I’m expensive and they can’t deny most of my care.