• Scubus@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’d be a damn shame if you accidently downloaded cloudstream, an android app that allows you to download and watch offline, or just stream nearly any show or movie. I wouldn’t recommend the super stream source, as it almost always has a version available. Also, just in case, maybe don’t download tachiyomi to allow you to read any comics, manga, or graphic novels you want. It also has shitloads of hentai and pulls from almost every website imaginable.

      And avoid Anna’s archive, as it has tons of ebooks which might(I’m not a lawyer) actually just be legal?

    • SoleInvictus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      You absolutely should not subscribe to a VPN before not visiting any of those sites. I can’t recommend www.privateinternetaccess.com or www.expressvpn.com at all, clearly having never used them. They’re also useless for circumventing cell network limitations on video quality. Completely useless, otherwise I’d use them to subscribe to a cheaper lower data tier but still get 4k video.

    • IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Also, stay away from usenet and definitely don’t use the arr apps to automatically download your favorite shows and movies.

    • MadBigote@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      Imagine if people set up a Plex/Jellyfin after visiting those sites to have their own streaming service setup. Pure madness!

    • firadin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      So like what’s the actual deal with pirating content nowadays? I remember in the early 2000s it was don’t seed and don’t torrent just-released content and you won’t get caught. Are the companies more rigorous nowadays? Are they going after people and you really do need a VPN? Can you torrent content at a human-watchable pace (like a show or two a month, maybe a movie or two a week) and no one’s going to notice you?

      • The_v@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Depends on the country. In the U.S., instead of chasing users themselves, they have leveraged the Internet providers to act as enforcers. If you torrent something they first send you notice of violation from your Internet provider.

        If you continue to torrent, they can
        cancel your service or the copyright holder can start legal action.

        Honestly, I would never torrent anything anymore. There are great webpages that offer streaming for no cost.

        • Free Palestine 🇵🇸@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          A direct download/streaming site can be shut down at any time. Torrents are resistant to censorship, as they are decentralized. Just grab a good VPN or a seedbox and you can torrent as much as you want.

      • Jimmycakes@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Just get a VPN and torrent like normal in the 2000s. Nothing has changed. Seeding is not really a big deal anymore because everyone’s internet speeds are so fast.

    • Stephen304@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Also definitely dont look into setting up sonarr, radarr, prowlarr, and overseerr in combination with Plex or jellyseerr in combination with jellyfin. Otherwise you could find yourself with an extremely low touch automated downloading and organizing system that you can let your friends log into to request movies and shows without them needing to bug you at all for it to be downloaded in your preferred quality, size, codec, etc and automatically show up in Plex/jellyfin as soon as it finishes downloading, all renamed and sorted into folders as you please. That would be horrible.

  • Number1SummerJam@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    77
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    When will the greed stop? At what point will these corporations realize that the average American is completely stretched thin financially and will have to cease unnecessary expenses? They’re all just shooting themselves in the foot.

      • AllonzeeLV@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Incorrect.

        It will stop when our species exterminates itself out of greed.

        Climate change will probably only thin our numbers by the billions as a result of of the owner’s greed, but then they want to profit off AI, and CRISPR, and innumerable other potentially profitable means to our self-extinction.

        The greed will stop when all the humans are dead almost certainly by our own hands, and humans are actively working to accomplish this.

    • AProfessional@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      As consolidation continues corporations do not need to compete on prices as there are no alternatives. Yes people will pirate but they’ve already lobbied vendors to embrace DRM and governments to make it illegal so that makes it as annoying as possible.

      • Carobu@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Are we reading the same thing? Netflix has more competition now than it ever has. When Netflix had cheaper prices when it has no competition than it does now. Piracy has been making a huge resurgence as well.

        • query@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          “More competition” meaning less access, people having to pay for multiple different services instead of having it in one place.

          The competition should be about having the best platform, not exclusive content. There’s no reason why the same show couldn’t be on two different platforms. And available globally. Practically, all you really need is more local servers for where there’s more traffic.

        • AProfessional@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          When Netflix started they entered the market as a licensor of content from studios to be distributed as part of a streaming service.

          This possibility largely no longer exists. All of the studios have bought out competition, stopped licensing a lot of their popular content, and now release their content themselves. This means there is little competition in the film distribution market for streaming, beyond PayPerView.

    • Fribbtastic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      As long as people pay for it and they make massive profits through it.

      I mean, look at the last situation in which netflix addressed account sharing. Their user number actually increased because of it from what I have read.

      Those people that can’t afford it will most likely switch to a less expensive tier and then probably see ads. I have seen that recently with my father who wasn’t even bothered or annoyed by the constant ads while watching a single episode.

      • Wisely@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I don’t understand how people are ok with ads? They annoy me so much. It’s wasting your time so it can attempt to manipulate you into buying stuff with the money you can’t afford to spend.

    • Ado@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      We keep saying this but they keep profiting more and more every time lol. Remember when everyone on reddit was gonna quit Netflix for the password sharing block? Ya, their users increased afterwards.

        • Ado@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          If Netflix is out right lying, I’m sure stockholders would be happy and not tank the stock at all

          • Iamdanno@lemmynsfw.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            As long as they are profitable, and the stock price is up, the stockholders wouldn’t even question their user numbers.

            • Ado@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Lol no, stockholders wouldn’t want to risk the fallout of Netflix being caught

      • eee@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Well… New tech should make higher storage densities mainstream again in 1-2 years. Seagate just released 32TB HAMR drives for commercial use

  • Margot Robbie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    59
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    We should all know that Netflix’s method of “throwing money at the wall and hope one of the shows becomes a hit, cancel immediately after a season if it doesn’t work out” is completely unsustainable at this point, as this kind of dehumanizing disposablilty of production is the exact " industry disruptive" approach to expect from a bunch of arrogant Silicon Valley techbros, so this cost increase should not come as a surprise.

    Many long running shows have had pretty bad first seasons, “Parks and Rec”, the US version of “The Office”, and “The Simpsons” comes to mind, and these shows would never have even gotten off the ground if Netflix was running them, because as with all industries, it takes a while for people to find their footing and get to know each other to work together effectively.

    The real sad part is, the industry that has copied Netflix’s “disruptive” approach are now finding out that the emperor has no clothes and are desperately trying to pass the cost off to anybody else for their own survival, which is why it is more important than ever to fight for the dignities of the people who worked on your favorite shows for your entertainment.

    • Metatronz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      1 year ago

      I could very well be mistaken and please correct me if I am. I remember reading that canning a show before season 3 or so was a way of getting around union costs that kick in for a ‘longer’ running show. A very anti labor strategy designed to cash in quickly then drop it so Netflix wouldn’t have to share the wealth.

    • MeanEYE@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      To be frank, I don’t think they care about anything else other than keeping people on the platform. Which is not such a bad goal to be had if they tried to achieve that with quality of service, good offering of entertainment, etc. What they are doing is desperately trying to create some long running series where on which people will get hooked and won’t be able to leave even if everything else starts sucking. Should this ever happen I think we can fully expect their next step to be reduced amount of licensing towards other shows and movies.

      But as you rightly put it, you can’t grow forever and ever increasing revenue can only be had in dreams.

      • Billiam@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Actually, I don’t think they care about retention at all, because to the industry retention = stagnation. They only care about new subscribers because that “shows” growth. They much prefer hearing “We increased subscriber counts by 10%!” over “We kept 100% of subscribers YoY!”

    • Isakk86@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Actually, cable didn’t even raise prices this fast. We’ve, unsurprisingly to anyone familiar with capitalism, created something worse.

    • MeanEYE@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Perhaps they realized number of people that keeps paying versus number of people who cancel their subscription results in net positive revenue, so they are testing where the line is. All the while trying to fund some new content to get more people to come back.

      • 👁️👄👁️@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I wouldn’t doubt there’s collusion. It’s very convenient that none of these services are taking advantage of this and are seemingly raising all of their prices simultaneously.

  • Boozilla@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    48
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Thanks for reminding me that I haven’t even watched Netflix in a minute. I cancelled it. Fuck them.

  • TheDude@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’ve been a Netflix customer for over 20 years. The recent password crackdown and constant price gouging led me to cancel their service yesterday. Yo Ho MF’ers.

    • Archer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      I canceled just after the CEO said that paid customers could be getting ads. Knew that was the beginning of the end

    • rckclmbr@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Netflix does have good shows, but they’re just so few and far in between. I stopped my subscription about a year ago, and haven’t missed it. I’ll resubscribe this month to watch Fall of the House of Usher, then unsub again just because there’s nothing to watch.

      Honestly I wouldn’t be surprised if others are doing this, the streaming companies catch on, and we pay a bulk amount for a season a la early iTunes again

      • 8rhn6t6s@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        I agree, I just hate that when they do have good shows they cancel it immediately 🤦. I cringed when they canceled 1899 and inside job.

  • boatsnhos931@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    1 year ago

    Argh matey, I’d rather walk the plank than pay those greedy pigs! Tis the high seas for me landlubbers!!!

  • Arethusa@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Sounds like Netflix is panicking and scrambling. The frequency of their subscription hikes increases and increases. Perhaps they think they can price hike their way out of the dissatisfaction they have delivered to subscribers. Keep trying Netflix, find that magic subscription price point that will surely cover for all the subscribers you’re shedding with your idiocy and will definitely not hasten your arrival to 0% revenue. Increasing that price won’t lose you more subscribers right? Of course not. Burn Netflix burn.

    • Cornelius_Wangenheim@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      More like they took on a shitload of very low interest debt back when the fed rate was 0%. Now that the fed rate is 5.5%, they can’t just roll over the loans and have to start paying them back.

    • JasSmith@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      They’re finding the optimal price point. Each time they raise they lose some customers, but their increased revenue leads them to being more profitable afterwards. Eventually the price increases will result in so many people leaving that they’ll have to stop.

      Problem is, this strategy has exactly one direction: irrelevance. It can take a very long time to get there, but eventually you lose so many subscribers that your competitors have begun eating your lunch. The profits were solid so you didn’t care. It’s the normal business life cycle, and Netflix is well into the mature phase. We have worse quality and higher prices to look forward to.

      • Arethusa@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Netflix’s lowered revenue growth is the highlight. That’s what they and their investors focus on, with subscriber satisfaction being an afterthought. The price hikes haven’t shown any effect on that downward trend either. But hey, keep hiking I say. Fires burn bigger when fuel is added and these people can’t differentiate water from gasoline. Having washed my hands of this company, I’m looking forward to further scrambling when revenue growth is nil and then negative and the stock drops and drops and the corporatists wail.

  • GreenBottles@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    it’s amazing that they think people are going to continue to pay them at these prices for no content

    • TwilightVulpine@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      1 year ago

      Some people seem to believe the customers are suckers who will eternally take the price hikes, but even the most gullible fool still doesn’t have infinite money. At some point they’ll have to cut something or the bank will cut it for them.

      Well, back to the seas it seems. It was fun while it lasted. One might as well pay for a VPN instead.

      • jimbolauski@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m sure they did the math they’ve calculated that the increases will offset the loss is subscribers. From the article it looked like the royalties will increase so less subscribers paying more is even more profitable.

        • TwilightVulpine@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          It wouldn’t be the first time companies precisely calculate next quarter earnings and fail to account for the long term survival of their business.

      • deafboy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        The customers are suckers who will take a lot. Look up skylink satellite tv provider, and their “always free” tier that’s currently 6,90€ a month.

        They gave it for free just around the time analog tv was being decomissioned. And after they’ve captured the large userbase, who couldn’t switch back, they pulled the trigger.

      • Free Palestine 🇵🇸@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        If you go with Mullvad (which is one of the best private VPN providers) you even save some money, as it’s just 5 EUR/month. You can also take the 20 bucks that you would have given to Netflix and pay a seedbox company like RapidSeedbox to torrent anonymously.

        • jantin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Huge +1 for Mullvad for their pricing model. 5€/month regardless of “plan” and you can buy as many or as few months as you like. I never feel chained to Mullvad, never worried about subscription running out or getting charged at random moments. Pay 5€, watch whatever you want on the foreign tv websites, forget about vpn for the next 3 months.

          • Companion1666@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            If you love Mullvad’s pricing, you may check out iVPN’s one-week plan for $2. Like Mullvad, you don’t need an email address to register, just generate an ID and supports WireGuard. Personally, both Mullvad and iVPN have a similar connectivity performances.

          • Free Palestine 🇵🇸@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Mullvad also gives you free multi-hop. It’s not particularly useful for torrenting, but it’s great for privacy in general. But it’s not available in the mobile apps, so I will stick with IVPN.

    • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Every time Netflix changes anything, people freak out and say they’re gonna lose all their subscribers.

      And every time, Netflix makes more money than before, because they have awesome data analysis and have a very good idea of how many subscribers will leave and how much more money they’ll make from the remainder.

      I remember when they lost like 4% of their subscribers a few years back and everyone was all doom and gloom, but they’d raised their rates like 15%

      • tahoe@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah, this is exactly like the Reddit and Twitter situation. No matter how bad it gets, people don’t care. If they’re used to something, they’ll rather put up with the new bad stuff than changing their habits.

    • Son_of_dad@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I keep hearing people say this no content thing. Meanwhile I just went through Castlevania, one piece, sweet tooth and Kingdom this past week and there’s like 30 shows and movies on my cue

      • Gabu@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        You enjoyed the garbage fire that was Castlevania? Don’t get me wrong, the first season was good enough, but then the writing quickly devolved into a 10 year-old’s edgy fanfic, and the animation quality dropped off a cliff.

        If only Konami gave the green light to a japanese studio like Madhouse.

        • Son_of_dad@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Lol if it’s not a 10/10 it’s “a garbage fire” to you guys. Not everything needs to be a masterpiece

          • Gabu@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            When you have one of the best franchises in the world to draw your story from, it better be 10/10, yes

  • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    1 year ago

    You know I really should get around to getting a paid tier of proton VPN so that I can have cannons on me ship when I sail the high seas.

    • DoctorWhookah@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      I can’t complain about performance. The iOS and macOS apps are good. I am leaving the country for a vacation soon so we’ll see how it goes.

    • Elven_Mithril@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Proton vpn is great! I have switched to their ecosystem.long time ago and only thing they could do better is linux vpn. The official linux vpn cannot do any of the new things as for examole windows app.

    • Psythik@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Speaking of which, I’d like to take this opportunity to remind everyone that Stremio* + Torrentio is a thing, and contains the entire catalog of every streaming provider combined. Works on smart TVs too.

      • TechAnon@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Because of this comment, I’m converting. Thank you so much! Doesn’t seem to hard to figure out and there are plenty of articles online for this. I see a lot of them also add Real Debrid for higher quality and to remove the need for VPN. Anyway, you rock!

        • Psythik@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Yes, Real-Debrid is a nice addition. Not only can you stream faster with it, you can use it on your PC as well to download any torrent you want instantly without waiting for seeds. It’s a game-changer.

          Edit: Also Trakt.tv is another good plug-in if you want suggestions based on your viewing habits.