“We’ll hold on to your land for a while, until you elect new leaders. Here! Take these walkie talkies as a gift. You won’t regret it!”
This used to be called an invasion.
So who are the judges, you ask? Who are they all! How to call those people, countries that invade foreign and countries, which have their own way of life, traditions, way of thinking, a different understanding of life… I want to ask
Why do you always say: dictator, murderer, enslaver, etc. What can you theorists know about this? Do you even know how people lived under Saddam Hussein, the most developed medicine, complete tolerance of religion, there were no Islamic states, Houthis, etc., one of the highest standards of living and its quality in the region, the same thing happened in Libya during the time of Gaddafi, Muammar’s state flourished and what is happening now in both states? Islamist’s, states torn to shreds, complete lawlessness… Should I continue… China?! How is this not a dictatorship? And that your computers are made in China, iPhones, cars… nothing?!
Were you in Syria in 1995? Of course not and you don’t know or wouldn’t want to know how they lived, and they lived very well, better than now, for example, the Baltic countries, etc. Dictator, dictator… You have to think sometimes!
If anyone wants to know how to spot when someone has a clear and extreme bias, one can spot it very clearly in the comment above.
When someone lists a group’s (religion, race, ethnicity) existence as a negative along with things like “lawlessness, state torn to shreds”, you now have a firm understanding of who they’re willing to dehumanize to make their points.
Tell me more about how great rule under those genociders was.
YOU DON’T UNDERSTAND!!! IT’S SELF DEFENSE!!!
👍
Did someone say new settlements?
Hans, are we the baddies?
I wish they were that reflective
Younited States of Syisrael … maybe once Jordan is “self-defended” JordSyisrael …
Lebajordasyisrael
then
Egylebajordasyisrael
ZSIS - Zionist State in Iraq and Syria
Seeing this move should’ve immediately sent Hezbollah to break the ceasefire, at least if they’re interested in not letting Israeli forces flank their metaphorical Maginot line by going through a neutral-but-defenseless country.
Hezbollah accepting a ceasefire without Gaza meant they have been completely defeated.
Hezbollah is an ambusher fighter, not an offensive fighter, though
Besides, don’t wanna get in another Syrian quagmire
Bruh
They kicked out the dickhead dictator, another one comes strolling in.
That’s just the way the cookie crumbles. You saw what happened in Iraq and Libya…
That again, some might say this present situation is the best system, compared to the dictat of {insert anti-U.S foreign power}, which, fine, I’m not gonna argue but I’m not going to entertain it
