• andrewthe95th@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    219
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    25 days ago

    I feel like you guys are addicted to letting perfect be the enemy of good. Yes, Bluesky being corporate run will probably be an issue down the line, but if it becomes mainstream then people will be used to seeing .APP.INSTANCE and feel more comfortable with the fediverse interface, which I know at least for me was a big hurdle. Like seriously, the fact that the next big thing is federated, even if in name only, is a big step forward.

    • Cheems@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      24 days ago

      Expecting perfection is a huge problem in all aspects of life. People just want instant perfection and aren’t willing to work towards it. Then there’s just apathy and that leads to stagnation or worse regression.

    • priapus@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      23 days ago

      Bluesky is such a huge improvement over twitter and so many people are just ignoring that. Yes, the app is centralized, but you can still host your own data if you choose. Plus, the customizable feeds, algorithms, and moderation lists are all great.

    • xavier_berthiaume@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      25 days ago

      Yeah I’m a huge believer in federated systems but I believe that a lot of ‘normies’ going to bluesky is a huge step in the right direction. Even though most don’t know anything about the tech behind it and migrate because twitter has become a bot infested right wing hell scape, they still are one step closer to being fully integrated to the fediverse.

      • airportline@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        25 days ago

        Bluesky’s ActivityPub support is also leagues better than Threads because of Bridgy Fed. At least a Bluesky user and a Mastodon user can follow each other and have a back-and-forth conversation.

    • JoYo 🇺🇸@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      16
      ·
      24 days ago

      the irony of a bsky supporter complaining about being judged because it’s not perfect.

  • Experimental Cyborg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    83
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    24 days ago

    Mastodon is gatekept to hell and back, the technicalities of federation are exposed to the user for some reason (you already lose half your potential user base right there), infighting between instances means that you won’t see the entire discourse of a post depending on which instance you’re at…

    And besides all that, bsky is not as “corpo” as mastodon fanboys make it out to be. They’re on track to open up to privately hosted instances as well, and you can already run most of their backend stuff yourself.

    • proton_lynx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      40
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      24 days ago

      As much as I like the ‘decentralized’ stuff, the technical part of federation should NEVER be exposed to the end user if you want the platform to be mainstream. I still don’t understand why a lot of federated projects think it’s a good idea to expose that to the end user.

      • Jesus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        39
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        24 days ago

        Whenever Lemmy or Masto gets a flood of new users, a portion of them never make it past the instance selection and totally bail.

        The user experience was designed by people who literally respond to user feedback by telling users to commit new code to the project.

        It’s clearly designed by engineers who assume other users will be just like them.

          • Jesus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            23 days ago

            The project was started as an architectural thought experiment, not with the goals and limitations of the end user.

          • Carighan Maconar@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            24 days ago

            Probably not. Currently it seems on track that you’re always first on their main instance. If you’re technically inclined you could then start hosting a federated part yourself (or joining one), but this does not change that the actual entry experience is exactly the same as on Twitter, hence why transition is so insanely smooth and painless.

          • Bongles@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            24 days ago

            The way sign up currently is, probably not. It would still default to bsky.social and your average person isn’t going to think about it.

    • Trekman10@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      24 days ago

      I think a lot of the attitude I saw on mastodon about this like a year ago was one of suspicion that they wanted an open network but didn’t use the fediverse standard

  • Telodzrum@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    60
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    24 days ago

    If Mastodon wanted to be preferred, it should have been better. I moved to Mastodon over a year ago when the Twitter sale first happened. It was not great then and it’s gotten slightly worse since. I created a Bluesky account two days ago and it already offers exactly the experience I missed from Twitter before Elon.

    Would it be better if Mastodon was good and the federated FOSS option was superior? Sure, absolutely. But, that scenario isn’t even close to the case we are presented with.

    • x00z@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      24 days ago

      Can you give actual examples?

      I feel the only thing that Mastodon ‘misses’ is some feed to get you addicted.

      • Gigasser@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        23 days ago

        Might be paranoid, but I feel as if alot of the anti-mastodon sentiment is astroturfing. Might just be me and my schizo anti-corpo mind though.

        • JoYo 🇺🇸@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          24 days ago

          the astroturfing is happening but don’t fall into the trap of thinking that makes it less real. astroturfing works or they wouldn’t do it.

    • JoYo 🇺🇸@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      24 days ago

      I’ve got a bsky account too but I get way more engagement on my fedi accounts. I’ve been building up my follows for 15 years on the fedi so bsky never had a chance to catch up. it probably never will.

  • Fedizen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    edit-2
    24 days ago

    bluesky has made better choices - the starter packs and user lists are great for new users. They managed to add quote tweets but let the quoted person opt out of dog piles. It looks like they added options for custom algorithms too.

    Bluesky will be enshittified but mastodon should be taking notes if they want to pick up people next wave.

    The bluesky system is just way better. The local/fed feeds on masto are just wasted.

    • BonesOfTheMoon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      24 days ago

      The block lists for various types of assholes are also a marvellous invention. It’s so nice to block all of MAGA at a click

    • BMTea@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      24 days ago

      What if we’re wrong and BlueSky just gets better? I mean, with some of the corporate trappings of old Twitter, but still user-friendly, big userbases, vibrant subcultures and banning troublemakers?

      • Carighan Maconar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        24 days ago

        I mean even if it repeats “the Twitter mistake” that’d still be another 13-14 years to go. Who knows where short-form social media will be conceptually in that time and whether any competition in the space is even still relevant.

      • JaggedRobotPubes@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        23 days ago

        It will, but it still has that countdown timer over its head.

        The future is the fediverse, some yet-to-be-invented non-corporate equivalent, or offline.

      • JoYo 🇺🇸@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        23 days ago

        the concept of more than one website is so challenging for plebs.

        use both and please don’t bridge bsky to the fedi.

  • B312@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    24 days ago

    It’s almost like the average person doesn’t care about the fediverse and decentralisation and only wants muskless twitter. Nooo clearly the normies are idiot sheep

  • Carighan Maconar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    24 days ago

    People who genuinely think like this (as in, that users going to Bluesky is somehow bad, surprising or something only stupid people do) are the very reason systems such as Mastodon cannot work. And sadly they naturally pervade such systems, at a development, administration and user level.

  • JaggedRobotPubes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    23 days ago

    If the internet has a future, it’s on the Fediverse. We work around capitalism to avoid enshittification, or we let it defer our future further.

    In the meantime, the Fediverse needs to get shiny and intuitive. The sign that something is cumbersome and hard to use is people saying “it’s not that bad”.

    • Jesus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      23 days ago

      People may disagree with how BlueSky is organized and architected, but I get why they decided to do what they did. User experience.

      Their architectural decisions mean that people don’t have to worry about instances confusing people, and the org structure means is easy to staff a proper dedicated experience team that can be working, planning, and testing before big expensive decisions are committed to code.

        • Jesus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          23 days ago

          Filing as a B corp wouldn’t be my first choice if I was trying to prioritize getting rich.

          • wabafee@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            23 days ago

            That is how it usually starts. It start innocent but the moment you see potential money or the funding runs out you either become like OpenAI, Google or go obscure worst bankruptcy. It does not help that their protocol is basically how search engine works today. They control the flow of information and funded by venture capital.

  • johannesvanderwhales@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    24 days ago

    Mastodon may or may not be good (I don’t use it), but the fact that it segments off users into different groups means it will never be a twitter replacement. The fact that twitter is essentially “public” and all sorts of people from different areas interact was basically the whole point of it.

    Bluesky seems pretty nice so far and it has real momentum. Mastodon seems more along the lines of what Google+ turned into.

    • TORFdot0@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      24 days ago

      Mastodon doesn’t silo its users, that’s what federation is for. Everything you post on the public timeline is essentially public for everyone that’s on a federated instance that hasn’t gotten blocked.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      24 days ago

      I’m just dreading the inevitable monetization. These spaces are fun in their alpha state. But it’s just a matter of time before there’s a “Let AI help you spam Shrimp Jesus to your friends” button and a “Pay $5 to override the Block function” feature.

    • Fedizen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      23 days ago

      I would argue siloing is easier on bluesky - block list manager drama can definitely have a similar effect to user admin drama. The thing mastodon does poorly is discovery. The fed and local feeds are nonsense on Masto. Imo it should be replaced with local admin/user curated topical feeds and top cross server topical feeds.

      Mastodon requires far more effort to create a new feed than bluesky, and that’s the major problem.

  • vordalack@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    24 days ago

    Mastodon is social media where no one comments or likes anything.

    It’s like a modern art masterpiece.

    • JoYo 🇺🇸@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      23 days ago

      maybe when I first started 15 years ago it was like this.

      now I have a community that will follow me on whatever bullshit instance I create because I got a clever domain name.

  • ObliviousEnlightenment@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    23 days ago

    Heres the thing with federation

    It will always be more complicated, and lead to smaller segregated communities. This mitigstes the network effect social media services rely on

    • Fedizen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      23 days ago

      The consumer lockin then monetization lockdown cycle always sheds users. I think eventually most federated systems will gain users, albeit slowly.

        • Fedizen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          23 days ago

          The proof is that mastodon user base is steadily going up. There hasn’t been a giant spike in a while but the barrier to monetization is too high for it to shed users from that. Its more like how wikipedia has outlived google as a resource despite wikipedia not being particularly better now than soon after it started.

    • capital@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      24 days ago

      I’ll be more excited about that when they start allowing larger federated instances.

      I haven’t read a ton about it, I have to admit, but last I read, federated instances are limited in number of accounts.

      More generally, the idea that taking crypto bro money will allow them to stay as open as Mastodon sounds unlikely to me.

  • Suavevillain@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    24 days ago

    I like Masodon but the user experience on Bluesky is easier and great block tools too. I don’t mind Mastodon not being mainstream, it is kinda good to have niche parts of the net still.

  • DigitalDilemma@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    24 days ago

    Twitter’s already served its purpose. People slagging it off because it’s losing money really don’t understand that it won a country.

    • interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      24 days ago

      Seriously, seizing the means of mass communication means you own democracy, you own the governement, you own everything. Twitter, while it remains how the cultural elites communicate, is worth basically 30 trillions.

  • nexguy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    24 days ago

    I think the hate for BlueSky is proof that it’s important enough to work. Buhbye elon