• CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      being treated as an object of reverence to be kept and provided for rather than a person of equal contributions to be given the same status as everyone else, is itself a form of oppression. Consider that “revered and provided for” is also the status of a cat, and while we certainly love those, they arent exactly treated as anything like our equals.

        • Pennomi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Both those things can be true. One is caused by sexism, the other by classism. Neither negates the other, and implying so is incredibly dismissive.

            • Pennomi@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              The “limited fashion choices for a man to wear” was enforced by men, not women. It’s not the slam dunk argument you seem to think it is. (Especially considering during the same era women couldn’t own property or vote.) Men have had privilege for nearly all of recorded history.

              I know you’re just doubling down on your argument here, which is a normal human thing. You should really read up on the topic and see what experts say about sexism. There are lots of good citations in the Wikipedia article here: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexism

        • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          11 months ago

          Men have always had the freedom to choose what they want to be - for women it’s the fucking bird cage or nothing… now the bird cage is gilded and pretty, but it’s still a fucking bird cage.