Sophia Rosing was banned from the University of Kentucky campus after the incident

A college student who went on a drunken tirade using the n-word 200 times will now head to jail for a year.

Sophia Rosing, a former student at the University of Kentucky, became infamous in 2022 for her rant that was captured on video and shared on social media. In the video, Rosing was caught using the slur at a fellow student and assaulting her.

Rosing previously pleaded guilty to four counts of fourth-degree assault and other charges. When she entered her plea, she apologized to fellow student Kylah Spring and members of the Black community.

This week, a judge in Kentucky sentenced Rosing to 12 months in custody and 100 hours of community service, according to Lex 18.

In the infamous video Spring said that Rosing struck her numerous times and kicked her in the stomach. As Spring is explaining what happened to her, Rosing can be heard yelling at her in the background, calling the Black student the n-word and a “b****” throughout the footage.

  • buddascrayon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    118
    ·
    2 months ago

    Watch her get out in a year and be invited to go on the Republican lecture circuit to talk about how woke politics is ruining American college campuses.

    This isn’t a joke, I seriously think this will happen.

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    93
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    2 months ago

    Interesting that the Independent made sure to mention that this student was drunk not once, but twice, as if that were an excuse.

    No one says that word when drunk if they wouldn’t be willing to say it out loud in certain company.

  • Nastybutler@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    55
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    How was this not elevated to a hate crime? That sentance is weak sauce for a racially motivated attack

    • WoahWoah@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      2 months ago

      It’s hard not to just be blunt here. She’s a white girl. Sentencing guidelines and police protocols are different for people matching that description. It’s a known, researched phenomenon.

      It’s not unreasonable to say that the police work for non-impoverished, non-overweight white women. It’s noticeable in how quick white women are to call the police and think the police will help with a problem.

      Statistically, you are roughly about 1000% more likely to experience police violence if you are not a white woman.

      • ObjectivityIncarnate@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        It’s not really for being a white girl, it’s primarily for being a girl.

        Women get 63% lighter sentences for the same crimes as men ( https://academic.oup.com/aler/article-abstract/17/1/127/212179 ), while there is no racial gap between white and another race, whether among men, or women, that’s even half that wide ( https://www.ussc.gov/research/research-reports/2023-demographic-differences-federal-sentencing ).

        • WoahWoah@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          The first article doesn’t primarily address racial disparities within the context of gender. The second one, which does, notes pronounced leniency for white women vs. women of other races. As a woman, you are between 12-30% less likely to receive probation instead of incarceration if you aren’t white. Where things were roughly equal is if you are being incarcerated, which is more likely if you’re not white as noted above, you are likely to get a roughly equivalent period of incarceration for an equivalent crime. All of these outcomes will be significantly worse if you’re a man.

          • ObjectivityIncarnate@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            2 months ago

            None of that contradicts the simple point I made, which is that being a woman instead of a man is a vastly larger advantage in the US with respect to judicial leniency, than being white instead of another race, and yet certain biased people always seem to want to imply/argue that the latter is the primary factor, when it isn’t.

            As an analogy, it’s kind of like how when people are talking about rape, discourse is typically more likely to center on ‘jumped in a dark alley’ type scenarios, even though the fact is that that is literally the least common way rape happens, and that statistically, it’s very rare for the assailant to be a stranger to the victim.

            • WoahWoah@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              I was just clarifying for others where you said that sentencing isn’t harsher for women of color, which isn’t true for sentencing in general, only for sentences involving incarceration, which non-white women are more likely to receive.

              • ObjectivityIncarnate@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                2 months ago

                you said that sentencing isn’t harsher for women of color

                Literally never said that. I just pointed out that being the ‘wrong’ sex hurts you more than being the ‘wrong’ race.

                White men get sentenced much more harshly than black women for the same crime, for example. That’s a fact.

          • WoahWoah@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            Most broader social biases translate into higher rates of police violence, albeit not always evenly. Weight bias in society is a fairly well-established phenomenon. It translating into an increased risk of police violence hardly seems a stretch.

            Your best chance of a low-risk encounter with the police and a favorable outcome in the justice system is to be a slim, upper-middle-class, college-educated white woman. If you only get to choose one, as the commenter above noted, choose woman.

  • octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    However, Spring said after the plea hearing that she did not believe Rosing was remorseful.

    Yeah, I can look at that mugshot and tell she’s not. Glad (and surprised) she got actual punishment.

    Edit: I’m making the assumption that’s the reflection of a bright orange jumper I see at the bottom of the photo, and the typical blandly colored cinderblock wall in the background.

  • andrew_bidlaw@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    2 months ago

    It’s like 4 minutes of straight up repeating the n-word. Besides her racism, how fucked up she was to vomit out that long of a manifesto?

    • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Maybe it’s like coprolalia, only IRL I’ve only met people inserting “бля епты” instead of pauses, sometimes f-words.

      • andrew_bidlaw@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Да даже пусть она использовала н-ворд как междометие перед каждым словом, либо она стремилась к достижению мирового рекорда, либо она не фильтровала базар зачитывая целый получасовой спич. Я не вижу как она могла кидать предъявы и накинуть 200 таких слов в процессе. В любом случае, говно она а не человек и я её сорт на вкус определять не вызвусь.

  • AeonFelis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 months ago

    I’ll never get the American mindset which considers “used the n-word 200 times” the main offense, the one worthy to be in the headline, while “struck her numerous times and kicked her in the stomach” is just a minor detail that happens to be mentioned somewhere in the article as an afterthought.

    • recklessengagement@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      It also only serves to continue fueling the polarization of the right. They point and say “See! They will put you in jail simply for saying words!” And since many don’t bother to open the article, it spreads and spreads and fuels their fear factory.

      It feels like “responsible journalism” is a thing of the past in the face of appeasing the Algorithm.

  • don@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    All that hideousness and just gets a year of jail and 100 hours of community service. Fucking Kentucky pantywaist conservative judge.

    • Flocklesscrow@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      They’re all just different tiers of parasitic businesses, intent on sucking up taxpayer funds to feed their bloated administrative staff. The “education” is secondary to revenue streams, and has been for decades.

    • stoly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      2 months ago

      She got expelled, has no degree, and will be found out for life when applying for work. Jail time is the least of her concerns.

    • 11111one11111@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Lol i don’t think people under stood the concept of In vino Veritas whoever doenvoted you. I think they thought you were implying the message of the woman yelling removed 200 times was the “hidden truth” and not that the hidding truth being that drunkyMcdrunk face being super fuckin racist is the actual underlying truth you are nodding to.