Except in this case, they used AI to help them make decisions. The lawsuit is still ongoing so I shouldn’t speak in definitive terms, but considering the circumstances and evidence I think it’s pretty clear than they have tried to automate some processes and didn’t audit them properly.

Company A raises prices because they are greedy bastards. Company B is then impressed with the sheer display of dominance by A and raises prices accordingly to “keep up”.

When there’s a dozen manufacturers, they won’t all do it. As I mentioned, this is price fixing and illegal in a lot of countries.

Secondly, what’s stopping someone from creating another company to undercut all of those greedy bastards to corner the market?

You know, at face value he’s absolutely right. We shouldn’t claim care that is unnecessary or maybe even harmful. But where we disagree is that I think that decision should be left to our medical professionals

Here’s a good breakdown: https://econreview.studentorg.berkeley.edu/unboxing-universal-basic-income/

As for my thoughts, yes there would be a noticeable impact at first, but UBI would help stabilise and strengthen the economy in the long term because purchasing power and demand will increase. If supply can keep up, prices won’t go up. Companies can’t just raise prices as that’s called price fixing. Antitrust laws should be there to prevent that, but your mileage may vary depending on your country. That means that if some companies decide to raise prices because of more purchasing power, some smart company is going to charge less to gain more market share. So we’re still doing capitalism, but there’s a social safety net.

Also, people will still go to work to find purpose. Except “work” in this case could mean the freedom and flexibility to contribute locally, or take higher risks like entrepreneurship or becoming an artist.

Fair enough

Is releasing multiplats out of the question when a stakeholder has 96%? Otherwise I fail to see what the connection is to my comment

Personally I don’t really care for their games, but I know they have a lot of fans.

Is it good or bad news though? Would they consider multiplatform games, which is better and healthier? Because that ain’t happening for sure now, anymore.

Jokes on you, she blows afterwards so my balls are nice and tight again

It was already a thing before Musk

All hail

That’s quite telling, thanks for sharing.

Actually, I searched some more and they did say things, so here’s a new post: https://lemmy.world/post/22975147

Depends to whom you mean…

It is, all I found was this from October: https://domainnamewire.com/2024/10/09/io-domain-names-arent-going-away/

Don’t think it was ever “planned” to end, it’s just unsure how Mauritius will handle the ccTLD, right?

Yeah that’s crazy to think about. Putting aside this specific case, the facts that suspects are being posted online and all their info being dug up is scary. What if it’s wrong and someone’s life is ruined by social media potentially forever?

In this case it would work out a bit differently, so again I mean more general speaking.

Arguments at the dinner table were solved by an exasperated FINE, I’ll get up and get the encyclopedia just to prove you wrong

Also, we had Encarta. It wasn’t online, but on a CD-ROM so you could view it digitally compared to the dozens of hefty books

That looks amazing, thanks for sharing sag!

Welcome to 10+ minute YouTube videos. This is why I rather read an article or just the source information.

I have not posted anything since I started using Lemmy over a year ago. I just respond to DMs and tell them to get off Reddit