• Brokkr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      56
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Market cap doesn’t say how much cash they have available. For that, look at cash on hand which publicaly traded companies need to report

      MS has about 75B cash on hand, so they could afford this themselves. They will probably argue that it will bring jobs and expertise to the state. Also, it’s a loan, so the interest will generate funding for the state as well. nevermind, not a loan from the state, so no interest would go to the state.

      • Repple (she/her)@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        ·
        2 months ago

        You’re right that it doesn’t mean cash on hand, but it does indicate they could liquidate some of that or borrow against it themselves.

  • peopleproblems@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    102
    ·
    2 months ago

    No, see that is explicitly not what I agreed with before.

    Microsoft buys the plant and Microsoft pays start and maintenance cost.

    If it will privately benefit Microsoft they can privately fund it.

  • BodePlotHole@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    48
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    Maybe Micro$oft should pull themselves up by their bootstraps and cut back on the avocado toast…Cunts.

  • Sentient Loom@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    2 months ago

    So let Microsoft pay to restart it.

    I guess it the government gives them the loan then the gov’t gets interest payments, which must help inflation over time. Assuming that they make those payments…

  • Gammelfisch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    2 months ago

    Watch the Netflix documentary about the Three Mile Island accident. Yeah, fuck that shit and keep it shutdown until maximizing profits becomes a lower priority than safety.

  • yesman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    OK, the Utility is getting a loan against expected future payments by Microsoft. So, if all goes to plan, MICROSOFT IS PAYING FOR THIS!

    • reddig33@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      If Microsoft is paying for it, why do they need a loan?

      Will Microsoft also be paying for any nuclear waste disposal?

  • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Ages ago, I read a book called N.U.K.E.E.

    I don’t remember all the specifics, but this seems hauntingly familiar.

  • chaospatterns@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    While I’m not a fan of the loan nor the massive waste of power most LLMs are, I actually think that’s its a good thing because if Microsoft can break through some of the excessive red tape on nuclear plants then they’ll bring this online and hopefully prove that nuclear power can be safe and a good source of large amounts of power, when the huge demand for AI dies down, then maybe they’ll keep the plant around and provide power to the grid.