• Metz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    90
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    I just quit my 270 000$ job at Coinbase to join the first YCombinator fall batch with my cofounder @not_nang. We’re building PearAI, an open source AI code editor.

    Of course it is a cryptobro…

    dawgt i chatgpt’d the license, anyone is free to use our app for free for whatever they want. if there’s a problem with the license just lmk i’ll change it. we busy building rn can’t be bothered with legal

    Yep, already hate that guy. Talks and behaves like an absolute dipshit.

      • CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        27
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        They’re not going to survive

        Are you kidding me?

        Alexander Bell stole the telephone.

        Edison regularly stole inventions from Tesla among others.

        Steve Jobs fucking mind raped Woz.

        The American Dream is taking someone else’s hard work and profiting off of it.

      • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Feels like the dotcom era all over again, but they’re better at stringing the scam along this time. Enough of the people need to believe the lie that it’s getting artificial longevity.

    • Croquette@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      VC funding is basically gambling, trying to find the next billion dollar company. So they throw money at anything that has any semblance of traction to get in early and cash out when the time comes.

      • PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 months ago

        Which is the exact same behavior that caused the dot com bubble. VC funding was throwing money at any and every dot com business, in the hopes that it would explode and lead to profits.

        All it did was massively overvalue the dot com companies, which caused a bubble when people finally realized they were overvalued and VC investors turned off the spigot of free money.

      • xenoclast@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 months ago

        Gambling with OTHER PEOPLE’S money.

        You win, you take a cut. You lose. Someone else suffers.

        These people destroy everything for greed.

  • Mwa@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Tbh I don’t think I wanna interact with ai anymore

  • SuperiorOne@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    2 months ago

    Road to success (2024 AI Hype Edition):

    1. Clone VSCode.
    2. Rename it as LSCode, squash all history, and create some random commits with --author="Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>".
    3. Add a character AI that calls your code garbage.
    4. Profit.
    • nednobbins@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      2 months ago

      There are a lot of scams around AI and there’s a lot of very serious science.

      While generative AI gets all the attention there are many other fields of AI that you probably use on a regular basis.

      The reason we don’t see the rest of the AI iceberg is because it’s mostly interesting when you have enormous amounts of data you want to analyze and that doesn’t apply to regular people. Most of the valuable AIs (as in they’ve been proven to make or save a bunch of money) do stuff like inventory optimization, protein expression simulation, anomaly detection, or classification.

    • xavier666@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      Slight correction. AI is not a scam.

      While AI is a powerful tool, it enables people to do scams very easily.

      • nednobbins@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Maybe.

        There have been a number of technologies that provided similar capabilities, at least initially.

        When photography, audio recording, and video recording were first invented, people didn’t understand them well. That made it really easy to create believable fakes.

        No modern viewer would be fooled by the Cottingley Fairies.
        The sound effects in old radio shows and movies wouldn’t fool modern audiences either.
        Video effects that stunned audiences at the time just look old fashioned now.

        I expect that, over time, people will learn to recognize the low-effort scams. Eventually we’ll reach an equilibrium where most people won’t fall for them and there will still be skilled scammers who will target gullible people and get away with it.

  • nednobbins@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    It’s otherwise a fairly well written article but the title is a bit misleading.

    In that context, scare quotes usually mean that generative AI was trained on someone’s work and produced something strikingly similar. That’s not what happened here.

    This is just regular copyright violations and unethical behavior. The fact that it was an AI company is mostly unrelated to their breaches. The author covers 3 major complaints and only one of them even mentions AI and the complaint isn’t about what the AI did it’s about what was done with the result. As far as I know the APL2.0 itself isn’t copyrighted and nobody cares if you copy or alter the license itself. The problem is that you can’t just remove the APL2.0 from some work it’s attached to.