• then_three_more@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    108
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    He says his son was eventually issued the passport and the family’s vacation is still on.

    Sounds to me like someone so the passport office was just being an idiot and when their supervisor looked into it it was resolved.

      • Nuke_the_whales@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        I’m an atheist and even I know that’s a weird comparison. You can’t copyright the name Jesus. Or Loki even cause they’re deities. But Skywalker as a name is for sure made up by Lucas. Maybe in 500 years when star wars is a recognized religion, but the star wars people need to do some conquering and crimes against humanity to qualify for that

        • stoly@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          My comment is not about them using copyrighted names. It’s about how silly people are who name children over fictional characters.

    • Miles O'Brien@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Come on, Flying… You knew that the minute you named them Coca-Cola Disney Unilever.

      I mean can you just imagine the teasing we would have heard on the playground with “cola”? Everyone knows colas are the lowest soft drink.

  • jpreston2005@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    Private corporations tying the hands of governments with copyright BS? If I want to name my daughter Khaleesi Skywalker Gandalf Bethooven SpaceJam that’s none of the governments nor some random corporations business. You can’t trademark a fucking name, wtf is this bullshit? You don’t get to decide what my name is, and you definitely don’t get to hamstring official government agencies in their duties because you’re butthurt about my sharing a name with your fictional character. Go fuck yourselves, disney. You slimy litigious fucks, this is why your brand is sinking.

    • yesman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      6 months ago

      This isn’t a rule. Some bureaucrat was mistaken.

      The same thing happened to another girl a couple weeks ago.

    • AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      6 months ago

      Yeah, Disney is slimy, but for once this isn’t their doing. Some paper pusher overstepped their boundaries, that’s not on Disney.

    • Squizzy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      There are rules around names for children with food reason, if you name your child Hitler and Unwanted you can expect government intervention because it can be perceived as child abuse by putting undue stress and difficulty on the child.

      Which I believe is fair

      This name doesnt quite hit that mark but I would defend government intervention when naming children for outlier cases.

  • General_Effort@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    6 months ago

    Something as short as “Skywalker” can’t be copyrighted. You don’t need permission to use a trademark as long as you don’t harm the brand or confuse the customer. Since trademarks are often family names, there are a number of unrelated companies that operate under the same name but in a different business.

    • Nuke_the_whales@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 months ago

      My son happens to have the name of one of my favorite comic book characters. However, it’s only one of his names, and also it’s a name that’s real and normal so nobody would think twice about it. I wouldn’t name him such an obvious name that is only tired to the one character

    • BruceTwarzen@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      I have a somewhat unusual name, that could me male or female. I really didn’t like it growing up. Now i don’t care anymore, moat people call me a wrong name anyway that sounds similar. But damn, growing up i just wanted a normal ass name.

      • otp@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        growing up i just wanted a normal ass name.

        Now, as an adult, you can name your ass whatever you want!

  • BoxOfFeet@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    6 months ago

    Man, that’s a stupid name. Poor kid permanently tied to a pop culture reference. Two, if the Loki is referring to Marvel. Naming a kid is not an opportunity to express yourself. If you want people to know you like star wars, get a tattoo. Or a bumper sticker. And then I’ll judge you. But leave the kid out of it.

    • brlemworld@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      6 months ago

      How do you think Matthew, Mark, Luke, John, Jacob etc feel named after made up Bible characters?

    • barsoap@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      It’s probably a reference to Marvel. In the Germanic tradition you a) don’t name kids directly after gods, though gods may make up part of the name, say Thorgeir, Thor’s spear, and b) not after Loki. Between fucking a horse (and getting pregnant) and tying a goat to his balls he really should be off limits.

      • InvertedParallax@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        Between fucking a horse (and getting pregnant) and tying a goat to his balls he really should be off limits.

        So much for the tolerant left!!!

  • wjrii@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    I think this is the second time this has happened in recent months. I am wondering if the UK bureaucracy has some sort of training about not violating trademarks generally, or some sort of software filter to avoid trademarked terms. Regardless, it seems like a fairly petty annoyance that affects a tiny number of people and can be worked around.

    Or hell, maybe it’s the same clerk and Gareth from Slough is sticking to his guns.

  • gnomesaiyan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    Why would you do that to your child? I mean, you wanna change your own name, go for it.

    • Hikermick@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      Nowadays naming your kid is a way to make a statement about yourself. Like a vanity plate.

    • gedaliyah@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      6 months ago

      People have been choosing made up names from fiction for hundreds (thousands?) of years and as far I know, no one has died from it yet. Jessica is just a character from a play.

      • CmdrShepard42@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        I get the sentiment but “Loki Skywalker” and “Jessica” are far from comparable even if Jessica would have been viewed in the same light 500 years ago.

  • x4740N@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    6 months ago

    This is stupid

    So if they name a movie character Jane Doe then are they going to stop Jane Doe from getting a passport

    • nogooduser@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      It is stupid, yes, but they wouldn’t be able to do that anyway.

      I’m fairly certain that the article is using the wrong term here and the problem is that the name Skywalker is trademarked.

      You wouldn’t be able to trademark the name Jane Doe so you wouldn’t be able to prevent someone from using it.

      • homesnatch@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 months ago

        A trademark does not prevent a person from using a term in a non-commercial setting, it does prevent other companies from doing so.

        • x4740N@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          Is this US law, I’m assuming it is because its typically americans that mention legal stuff without saying what country the legal stuff is from

    • RamblingPanda@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      6 months ago

      And Loki is a Nordic god, so nothing to worry about (except if those gods get angry, then good night). The name Skywalker might be the bigger issue here. But even then, no copyright infringement, except if they try to sell their son I guess.

  • Media Bias Fact Checker@lemmy.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    6 months ago
    Malay Mail - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)

    Information for Malay Mail:

    MBFC: Right-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: Mostly Factual - Malaysia
    Wikipedia about this source

    Search topics on Ground.News

    https://www.malaymail.com/news/life/2024/09/21/seven-year-old-boy-denied-passport-by-uk-home-office-over-star-wars-copyright-infringement-for-skywalker-name/151183

    Media Bias Fact Check | bot support