• redisdead@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 months ago

        Right? People who are like ‘lol men r dumb’ are the dumb ones. It’s a social experiment, now a Saw puzzle.

        • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          Yeah its a low risk experiment. On par with poking an animal corpse with a stick, it makes sense that a solid number of men would immediately go with poke it with a stick. Also it kinda makes sense from an evolutionary point of view that men would be more prone to checking things that are low risk out, one man can make a lot of babies at a time while one woman can only make one baby at a time.

          I am now curious if the rate is similar for tans folks.

  • ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    86
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    When I was in grad school, a bunch of us were at the house of a guy with an invisible fence for his dog. Someone wondered if it was cruel and that led to each of the grad students there except me putting on the dog’s collar and then crossing the fence. (The consensus was that it really hurts, but it isn’t agonizing.) At the time I knew that not shocking myself was, in some sense, the smart thing to do, but in retrospect I regret being a boring dork.

    • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      I once voluntarily shocked myself with a dog collar at a party. It was kind of fun, so I did it about 20 more times and shocked other people with it too. In my defense, I was drunk.

    • smort@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      We would sit around the fire pit taking turns zapping ourselves with the electric fly swatter. Good times!

  • frickineh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    I’d love to be judgemental about this, but I’d absolutely be in that 25% of women who did it too.

  • rickyrigatoni@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    5 months ago

    I want to see the percentage who gave themselves more than one. They’re the real heroes of this study.

  • Mango@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    I’d zap my dick and give them a whole new category for their charts!

  • Gork@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    5 months ago

    “Ow, that was painful. What would happen if I press the button again?”

  • Jose A Lerma@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    5 months ago

    'Cause when a guy does something stupid once, well, that’s because he’s a guy,

    — Once-ler, 2012

    • HappycamperNZ@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      5 months ago

      While I know that’s not how stats work, I find it completely correct to belive that one women gave herself a shock from 4 participants, and 70 men did.

  • Wugmeister@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    I would like to see a study done with several groups:

    1. People who read multiple books each year
    2. People who watch lots of video essays
    3. People who listen to podcasts
    4. People who prefer short-form content such as TikTok
    5. Veterans
    6. Educators, such as teachers or professors
    7. Librarians
    8. A control group composed of people who either do not fit into the other categories

    I’ve heard a lot of people claiming some of these groups are better than others of these groups, but I’m rooting for a null result.

  • muzzle@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    5 months ago

    Do you know how many times I’ve tested the cattle electrified fence just to see what would happen?

    • 0laura@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      It’s the other way around. It’s not how many people that shocked themselves were women or men, it’s how many men shocked themselves and how many women shocked themselves. so if 50% of men shock themselves and 10% of women shock themselves it’d add up to 60

      • puppy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        Yes I understood that in the second reading. I deleted the comment but I guess it was not propagated in time everywhere. Also you can’t add up the men’s and women’s percentages because the number of participates could vary between the two groups.