• ASeriesOfPoorChoices@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    108
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    5 months ago

    for those who haven’t read the woman’s FB post, here is a clip:

    “…were attacked on Saturday night by a group of 7-10+ middle eastern men, believed to be from Syria, aged 18-25”

    Canada has a lot of issues at this moment, stemming in part from increased immigration in the last 3 years (causing housing issues, etc). This sort of event, “brown people beating up white women” could be a dangerous racial catalyst.

    I hope this gets dealt with as a single incident, but given current affairs, I am not optimistic.

    • madcaesar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      80
      arrow-down
      17
      ·
      5 months ago

      Immigration is such a fucked up issue almost everywhere. You’ve got the right blaming everything on brown people and the left claiming all immigrants are just peace loving pacifists looking for a better life.

      As with most issues the truth is in the middle and any immigration policy should absolutely demand that any immigrant coming into a country assimilate and fully support our values of equality for all.

      You cannot tell me you support equality for all when your religion makes your wife walk 5 steps behind you in a beekeeper suit at 30c weather while you get to strut around in shorts and flip-flops.

      • SuddenDownpour@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        44
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        5 months ago

        As with most issues the truth is in the middle and any immigration policy should absolutely demand that any immigrant coming into a country assimilate and fully support our values of equality for all.

        First generation migrants tend to be, in most receiving countries, less likely to commit crime than native-born population.

        http://www.antoniocasella.eu/nume/Bersani_2012.pdf

        They found that immigrant men and women were less criminally active than native-born men and women in regard to self-reported crime, being stopped by the police, being charged with a crime, and having contact with a criminal justice agency. This pattern of lower levels of criminal activity among immigrants compared to the native-born held in models controlling for key background characteristics including a variety of educational, employment, and family history measures.

        The problem comes with latter generations, if the receiving country isn’t doing an adequate job at integrating them. If the parents work really long hours, aren’t capable of spending much time with their kids, have trouble to pay kindergarten and have trouble teaching their kids the local language, if the kids are victimized by racist bullying at school, have less means to do well academically and land a good job, and are generally otherized by society, they’re at a larger risk getting alienated and engaging in antisocial behavior and even crime.

        So, if you don’t want migration to be a problem, invest in public schooling (including kindergarten), offer classes teaching the local language to adults, empower unions, protect labor, and fight racism.

        • TheEighthDoctor@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          5 months ago

          While the study has some value you cannot compare immigration from South America in US to immigration in Europe from North Africa and Middle East. People are people, but values, culture and religions are very different.

      • 2ncs@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        As with most issues the truth is in the middle and any immigration policy should absolutely demand that any immigrant coming into a country assimilate and fully support our values of equality for all.

        America is hardly a country of “equality for all” sadly

        Edit: This was literally 4 posts down

        • SupraMario@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          33
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          5 months ago

          This happened in Canada, what does the usa have to do with this? This same thing is playing out over in the EU as well, and everyone here is wondering how the right is gaining political growth…this is why. People inherently do not want groups that come over and violently force their beliefs on the population.

          • otp@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            5 months ago

            People inherently do not want groups that come over and violently force their beliefs on the population.

            Agreed.

            To me, though, there’s a bigger problem with people already here who are violently forcing their beliefs o to others.

      • tamal3@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        I agree, and it goes both ways. I was taking to a Mexican immigrant yesterday who hasn’t been home to see his mother in more than 20 years as he doesn’t have the ability to cross the border, and she has continuously been denied visas without explanation.

        There’s a lot of shit the US puts immigrants through as they walk on the edge of being allowed to exist here. My opinion is that we should both open our borders, and document the people who come through.

      • exanime@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        As with most issues the truth is in the middle and any immigration policy should absolutely demand that any immigrant coming into a country assimilate and fully support our values of equality for all.

        Plenty of born Canadians do not support these principles at all

    • Wanderer@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      5 months ago

      I hope this gets dealt with as a single incident, but given current affairs, I am not optimistic.

      Genuine question. Is it a single incident though?

      There have been a lot of reports of issues with people coming to western countries and not holding the same standards of respect for women.

      I think it should be dealt with as a single issue iff it is a single issue. If it isn’t a single issue why should it be treated as such?

      • Snowclone@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        5 months ago

        Police said one man stayed and made a statement, in the US at least this means identifying yourself, so they have a likely reliable way to identify the men involved

    • DMBFFF@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      I don’t think a lot of Syrians were allowed into Canada as much as Germany and Sweden (at least proportionately in the latter case).

  • nifty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    57
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    5 months ago

    Violent people should be brought to justice, this is unacceptable.

    There are many Muslim or Islamic immigrants who live in Western countries just fine, what happened here? Many Muslim and Islamic immigrants are LGBT+.

    The root cause of the issue in this incident should be examined, and if all else fails violent immigrants should be deported.

    • PolarisFx@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      5 months ago

      I work with middle eastern guys who are like this, they hide this side of themselves when I’m around (white guy) but it comes out when my female coworkers are alone. It’s common enough that I’ve heard about it from multiple people. But when I’m around they’re great and I consider them good work friends.

      • blazeknave@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        5 months ago

        It’s hard facing this as a lefty. I met a Muslim European colleague at an all hands in tel aviv during pride a few years ago. Went for super late night constitutional with a few other internationals including fellow Americans and the whole city was alive and really queer. In depth conversation with this otherwise really nice guy about how he would minimum believe mental illness, maybe disown, his daughters for being gay or trans. I understood it’s religion like anti abortion and I’ll never persuade him and didn’t argue, just shared perspectives and asked questions.

        • MiDaBa@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          5 months ago

          It’s not hard at all to face this as a leftist. You can acknowledge that homophobia and sexism are deeply rooted in Islamic religions while also recognizing that not every adherent is guilty of either. Pretending something isn’t true because it’s not pretty doesn’t benefit anyone except those who would utilize the blind eye to continue to do harm to society.

        • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 months ago

          What’s difficult about it?

          Criminals can be victims, victims can be criminals. There is no rule that groups humans into two groups. Oppressed and oppressor with zero movement between the groups. Instead humans just go around, get hit, and hit. Sometimes they avoid hurting people because they can’t, sometimes it is because they won’t.

          I have zero problems understanding that some Muslims have been mistreated by the West is one fact and a totally seperate fact is some Muslims would honor kill a LGBT person. Seperate facts.

    • Jiggle_Physics@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      40
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      I know homophobes that are atheists. while religion being gone would decrease it, do not expect it to be gone just because of that. People will always have issues with people different than they are.

      • fukurthumz420@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        5 months ago

        yes, but with religion out of the way, we can implement better education to reduce ‘otherism’ bias. i am convinced that the only obstacles stopping us from being better humans are all rooted in BS fairy tales.

        • Jiggle_Physics@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          You can be convinced, you will be wrong though. Religion is a means of justifying otherism, not the origin of it. People will just create another bunch of bullshit to justify why they aren’t bad people.

          • sparkle@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            Cymraeg
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            Lol what? You are delusional. I’m not sure Orthodox Slavs would agree that WW1 and the subsequent Russian Civil War were “secular” wars considering most propoganda from that time was highly religious and they were seen as “holy wars” by both Slavs and Germans. The Ottomans literally were a Sharia state and the Sultan framed the war as a Jihad against the enemies of Islam. There was deep religious subtext in WW1 from nearly all the major European powers.

            Both world wars were caused mostly by nationalism/ethnic conflict and recent history/economic problems. Secularism had literally not a single thing to do with it. Where exactly do you get this “WW1 and WW2 were caused by secularism” delusion from?

    • vonxylofon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      5 months ago

      Doesn’t work. USSR murdered and prisoned both religious people and gay people alike. The answer is not being a fucking cockwomble, which is admittedly more easily done if you’re an atheist, but by no means is a guarantee.

      • fukurthumz420@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        agreed! but the path to not being a cockwomble aligns pretty well with the goals of a reason based, humanitarian, secular society.

        if you don’t agree, what’s your path towards our common goal?

      • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Really? So why is that Krill East Orthodox Shaman announcing he hates gays every single week?

        Also show me the religious Muslim who isn’t a homophobe

        • rambling_lunatic@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          Up until fairly recently, Orthodoxy was not a strong influence on Russian life.

          According to this Guardian article, British Muslims have no chill, but more than a few Muslims on the mainland are chill with gays, particularly in France.

          You seem very centered on Abrahamic religions. Pretty much all Western neopagans are tolerant of homosexuals. Francis Cabral, a Jesuit missionary, recounts with disgust about how homosexual relations were tolerated by Japanese Buddhists. Hsing Yun, a Taiwanese Buddhist who died last year, specifically said that homosexuals must be tolerated. Haitian Voodoo has two deities associated with homosexuality. Various indigenous religions in America have similarly tolerant views, and the term “two-spirit” comes from them.

          • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 months ago

            Up until fairly recently, Orthodoxy was not a strong influence on Russian life.

            Someone should have informed my grandmother and all her old friends of this fact, since they were evidently confused.

            You seem very centered on Abrahamic religions

            And?

            • rambling_lunatic@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              5 months ago
              1. This is a few individuals. These individuals are old and thus in the group that is most religious. In another response in this thread I linked a study by Levada showing that for most Russians, religion is either minimally important or not a part of their life at all.
              2. Fukur said we will never be free from homophobia until everyone rejects religion.
      • fukurthumz420@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        is it really, though? provide some evidence. and if it is, do you have a better solution to reduce bias?

        • rambling_lunatic@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 months ago

          Okay :)

          The old homophobic laws of Russia, rooted in religion, were repealed under Lenin (Khoroshilova 2017). The reintroduction of crackdowns of homosexuals began during Stalin (ibid.). The Comintern began linking homosexuality to fascism and moral degeneracy under Stalinist leadership (Healey 2001, p. 183). Eventually, the USSR banned sodomy due to a conversation between Iagoda and Stalin, with Iagoda linking homosexuality to counterrevolution, degeneracy, corruption of the youth, and pedophilia (ibid., p. 184-187). This was then reinforced in propaganda by Gorky, who famously said “Destroy the homosexuals - Fascism will disappear” (ibid., p. 189-190).

          I will skip over legal changes of most of the post-Stalinist era of the USSR, as they matter little in this context. What does matter is that the USSR continued to be strongly antitheistic and anticlerical. As a consequence, religiosity isn’t intense in Russia, and many aren’t religious at all (Agapeeva 2021).

          Now let us look at modernity. Putin is allegedly religious, but his dislike of homosexuals is definitely secular in nature.

          Analysis of his homophobic comments and the justifications of anti-gay laws reveal the same preoccupations of Stalin and Gorky. The law against being gay in public was described as preventing the propaganda of homosexuality towards children (Roberts 2013). In an interplay with nationalism, the LGBT movement is seen as an influence from the degenerate West, bent on corrupting the Russian youth. This is best seen in the designation of prominent Russian gay activists and organizations as foreign agents (Human Rights Watch 2021) or the use of the English word “gender” to describe things they despise.

          Note how at no point have the protagonists of this story described homosexuality as a sin or invoked God. Indeed, the first half of this text is dedicated to Leninists.

          Anecdotally, I see this in my personal life as a Russian emigre. Many people in my family hold minor homophobic views, framed typically as disgust, seen universally as Western and liberal in character. All of the Russians I have personally heard expressing a disgust or dislike of homophobia are atheists.

          Now for the alternative solution:

          According to Pettigrew and Tropp (2008), the three main ways of reducing prejudice against a group is through increasing understanding of that group, lessening anxiety about the group, and improving empathy towards that group, with the second two being stronger factors. Contact with the group accomplishes all three. This is supported anecdotally by tales of bigots changing their positions when they found out their own loved ones were gay.

          One should note that a lack of empathy and high levels of anxiety about boogeymen are the hallmarks of a conservative worldview.

          Therefore, combatting homophobia is best done through increasing visibility, which is the function of “outness” and pride parades, and through combatting conservativism and the reactionary gender roles that led to the birth of homophobic attitudes in the first place. This would in turn entail a battle against class society in general, but that is a discussion for another time.

          Works Cited:

          Khoroshilova, Olga. 2017. “1917 Russian Revolution: The gay community’s brief window of freedom”. BBC. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-41737330

          Healey, Dan. 2001. “Homosexual Desire in Revolutionary Russia: The Regulation of Sexual and Gender Dissent”. University of Chicago Press.

          Agapeeva, Kseniya. 2021. “Religiosity During the Pandemic”. Levada.ru. https://www.levada.ru/2021/04/14/religioznost-v-period-pandemii/

          Roberts, Scott. 2013. “Vladimir Putin says anti-gay Russian laws are about ‘protecting children’”. Pink News. https://www.thepinknews.com/2013/06/26/vladimir-putin-says-anti-gay-russian-laws-are-about-protecting-children/

          Human Rights Watch. 2021. “Statement by Russian and International Human Rights Organizations in Support of Russian LGBT Rights Activists under Attack”. Human Rights Watch. https://www.hrw.org/news/2021/11/19/statement-russian-and-international-human-rights-organizations-support-russian-lgbt

          Pettigrew, Thomas F., and Linda R. Tropp. 2008. “How does intergroup contact reduce prejudice? Meta-analytic tests of three mediators”. European Journal of Social Psychology 38 (6): 922-934. doi:10.1002/ejsp.504.

          • fukurthumz420@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            5 months ago

            Now for the alternative solution:

            According to Pettigrew and Tropp (2008), the three main ways of reducing prejudice against a group is through increasing understanding of that group, lessening anxiety about the group, and improving empathy towards that group, with the second two being stronger factors. Contact with the group accomplishes all three. This is supported anecdotally by tales of bigots changing their positions when they found out their own loved ones were gay.

            One should note that a lack of empathy and high levels of anxiety about boogeymen are the hallmarks of a conservative worldview.

            Therefore, combatting homophobia is best done through increasing visibility, which is the function of “outness” and pride parades, and through combatting conservativism and the reactionary gender roles that led to the birth of homophobic attitudes in the first place. This would in turn entail a battle against class society in general, but that is a discussion for another time.

            do you think this approach is easier within the context of a religious society or a secular one? the beginning of your statement opens with “while rooted in religious doctrine”.

            i’m sorry, but you have an inherent bias towards secular society as a russian emmigrant. you grew up in an authoritarian society masked as a secular one. you should at least acknowledge this. it might not discredit you to say so.

            • rambling_lunatic@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              5 months ago

              I have not used the word “doctrine” at any point in my comment. If I had to guess, you’re referring to the “old laws” from the opening paragraph. These old laws are from Tsarist times.

              You contrast secular and authoritarian societies as opposites. They are not necessarily so. A society can be both.

              When you ask if my approach would be easier in a secular or religious society, you are mistaken in how you construct the question. First, a secular society does not preclude religiosity among its members. Second, the optimal approach would be a pluralist one.

    • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      Homophobia and Atheism aren’t mutually exclusive to one another, hell I know plenty of Atheist Transphobes… some of whom used to be gay allies until they were radicalized by the Alt Right.

    • MJKee9@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      5 months ago

      There is a really funny South Park episode about this… Bottom line is assholes will be assholes with or without religion, which is just a convenient excuse for assholery.

      • Nora@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        We don’t actually know this, just because one southpark episode depicts it happening like that doesn’t mean it would. Religion has a lot of archaic beliefs that actively harm people. It would be a lot harder for someone to be motivated to hurt someone if they didn’t believe they had a reason to justify it.

        • MJKee9@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          5 months ago

          There were assholes before religion. Putting an emphasis on it being the problem is naive, imo. History is full of secular assholes. I.e. nazis.

          • Nora@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            What are you talking about? Nazis were very religious…

            This is from their wiki article: “Nazi Germany was an overwhelmingly Christian nation. A census in May 1939, six years into the Nazi era[1] after the annexation of Austria and Czechoslovakia[2] into Germany, indicates[3] that 54% of the population considered itself Protestant, 41% considered itself Catholic, 3.5% self-identified as Gottgläubig[4] (lit. “believing in God”),[5] and 1.5% as “atheist”.”

            • MJKee9@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              5 months ago

              Just because it was the dominant religion in Germany at the time doesn’t mean that Nazism equated with religiosity. In fact, Hitler did not like religion being a potential rival to his power. The Nazi doctrine was very humanist, and drew,a lot of influence from science at the time. For example, the survival of the fittest mantra that had been popularized from Darwin’s studies was misappropriated by Nazi as part of their eugenics philosophy…

      • fukurthumz420@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        but assholes are far and few when people aren’t deluded by religion. are you people actually arguing in favor of a religious society?

  • KevonLooney@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    “A group of men walking on the other direction made a comment to me. My girlfriend, Tori, said ‘hey that’s my girlfriend,'" MacLean told CTVNews. “They continued walking and Tori followed them to basically say: ‘That is not OK’.”

    Don’t ever do this, no matter who you are.

  • Colour_me_triggered@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    5 months ago

    I’d encourage LGBTQ folk to relocate to western and northern Europe. It ain’t perfect, but you’re very unlikely to get the shit kicked out of you.

    • SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      These Syrian Islamists are also here. Like here in the Netherlands a couple of months ago two Syrians beat up an old Iraqi immigrant because he was wearing a cross. And in May a Syrian father honor killed his daughter with the help of his sons. This shit happens everywhere these Syrians fled to in huge numbers.

    • pewter@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      What does this have to do with Muslims? The article doesn’t even mention Islam. Did you respond to the wrong article?