The key problem is that copyright infringement by a private individual is regarded by the court as something so serious that it negates the right to privacy. It’s a sign of the twisted values that copyright has succeeded on imposing on many legal systems. It equates the mere copying of a digital file with serious crimes that merit a prison sentence, an evident absurdity.

This is a good example of how copyright’s continuing obsession with ownership and control of digital material is warping the entire legal system in the EU. What was supposed to be simply a fair way of rewarding creators has resulted in a monstrous system of routine government surveillance carried out on hundreds of millions of innocent people just in case they copy a digital file.

  • AdrianTheFrog@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    My ideal copyright would be 15 years or death of the creator or the end of sale/support, whichever is earlier. That would mean that Portal 2 has copyright and Portal doesn’t, which sounds about right.

      • WolfLink@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        6 months ago

        So Disney and Nintendo can keep doing what they are doing but also the same companies can steal the work of smaller artists almost immediately?

        No thanks.

        • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          So Disney and Nintendo can keep doing what they are doing

          After 30 years not even Disney or Nintendo will pay a billion for exclusivity.

          but also the same companies can steal the work of smaller artists almost immediately?

          Let’s make copyright non-transferable. For a company to retain copyright it must employ the creator.

        • angrystego@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          You don’t pay a plumber every single time you use his work 15 yrs after his death.

        • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          To retain copyright:-

          $2^n for year n

          $1 for year 1

          $2 for year 2

          $4 for year 3

          $1k for year 10

          $32k for year 15

          $1m for year 20

          $1bn for year 30

          • Soggy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            6 months ago

            Why, though? It still pointlessly favors people who already have money. Just get rid of it.

              • Soggy@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                6 months ago

                You are desperate to give rich fucks an avenue to maintain an advantage over everyone else.

                • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  6 months ago

                  No. I want to give small creators a tool to stop their work being stolen in the short term.

                  But I also want to force copyright monopolists to pay ever increasing tax on the property they hold that should really be in the public domain.

                  My proposal also means orphan works no longer exist.